Environment Provided for New Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (Smes) Report Writing Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Task
Each student is required to produce an individual report to review, analyse and evaluate a country’s effort to develop an environment conducive for entrepreneurship, identifying the critical issues related to supportive environment provided for new small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and problems surrounding new small enterprise creation as a tool of national economic development. The assessment aims to encourage an understanding of the role small enterprises plays in a specific economy, and the identification of specific national barriers to enterprise creation.
The primary objective of this assignment is to develop a critical understanding of the main contextual and conceptual issues related to enterprise and economic development, through an investigation of the literature and a range of relevant case-study examples. On successful completion, the assignment will enable the respective learning outcomes of the module. Of key importance in this assignment is reference to, and use of, a case-study of a country or region to illustrate the key issues. These examples can be drawn from a range of sources but their relevance to the main arguments must be effectively demonstrated.

CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeIntroduction5 to >3.45 Pts
Distinction
Excellent - Written report containing appropriate introduction that provides an overview of why entrepreneurial activities are important.
3.45 to >2.95 Pts
Merit
The introduction is well-written and provides a brief background of country. You could improve it by briefly addressing why entrepreneurship matters.
2.95 to >2.45 Pts
Pass
Satisfactory demonstration knowledge of the subject area. The introduction explains the aims of the essay. You could improve this by explaining why entrepreneurial activities matter.
2.45 to >0 Pts
Fail
Very poor written report containing a poor introduction, inappropriate structure.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBackground of the country or region
20 to >13.8 Pts
Distinction
Excellent written report that shows background of the country and the information you provided are relevant and clear.
13.8 to >11.8 Pts
Merit
The background of the country is well-developed. It is critical but you should have explained the current economic situation, SMEs growth, unemployment rate, etc11.8 to >9.8 Pts
Pass
Satisfactory background of the country. You could improve it by presenting information about SMEs growth, employment rate, etc. However, you have not done this.
9.8 to >0 Pts
Fail
Very poor explanation of the country's background. You should have explained the current economic situation, SMEs growth, unemployment rate, etc20 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeKnowledge creation
25 to >17.25 Pts
Distinction
Your work demonstrates a sophisticated and comprehensive knowledge of the subject area. you started by noting the shortcomings of the system and difficulties that SMEs/entrepreneurs face which is fine. But it may help the reader first to become familiar with the policies, projects, etc. and then read the shortcomings.
17.25 to >14.75 Pts
Merit
You provided a clear rationale and a very good explanation of knowledge creation. But you could improve this section by explaining the initiatives, policies, and programmes that have been developed by the government, universities, or by the private sector, for example in the R&D projects.
14.75 to >12.25 Pts
Pass
It shows competence in the knowledge creation section. But the development of some ideas in your work is limited. You should explaining the initiatives, policies, and programmes that have been developed by the government, universities, or by the private sector, for example in the R&D projects.
12.25 to >0 Pts
Fail
Your work contains some weaknesses. You provided a poor rationale and explanation of the knowledge creation. Your work fails to address one or more criteria fully.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeKnowledge exploitation
25 to >17.25 Pts
Distinction
Excellent critical analysis and reflection of exploitation of knowledge. It explains the role that universities and R&D projects play in the entrepreneurial ecosystem.
17.25 to >14.75 Pts
Merit
You improve the essay by explaining how difference programmes, R&D projects, universities, etc. help the exploitation of knowledge. In some cases, you have mentioned a policy or practice, but the link to entrepreneurship is not clear.
14.75 to >12.25 Pts
Pass
Satisfactory Knowledge exploitation. Also, the role that universities and R&D projects play in the entrepreneurial ecosystem is something to think about.
12.25 to >0 Pts
Fail
Knowledge exploitation has a weaknesses. You should explain the role that universities and R&D projects play in the entrepreneurial ecosystem. this section is very limited.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeConclusion and Implications
20 to >13.8 Pts
Distinction
Excellent Conclusion. It is very good that you have provided suggestions for how the current system can improve.
13.8 to >11.8 Pts
Merit
Good - Your work is well-structured and logically written and demonstrates good academic practice
11.8 to >9.8 Pts
Pass
Satisfactory reviewing of the report but not really detailed. You could improve it by suggesting how current practice can be advanced.
9.8 to >0 Pts
Fail
Very poor conclusion and implication/s
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeClarity of presentation and report writing style
The structure of the content, standard of English expression, use of Harvard business referencing and presentation on the page.
5 to >3.45 Pts
Full marks
The ideas you put forward demonstrate exceptional clarity and focus and your work adheres to the principles of good academic practice (citation and referencing; appropriate presentation format; clear, accurate English). Excellent written report containing appropriate structure, writing style, referenced sources, tables and graphs citation

    

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.