Ethics in the Social Sciences - Community Treatment Orders - Community Assignment Help

Assignment Task :

Instructions 

Choose a case study from the list below. 

You will be expected to consider what dilemmas are presented by the case study, and how  these issues and the solution might be informed by the theories examined this semester.  

This assessment is designed to help you explore the conversations around ethics in your  academic discipline and/or professional pathway.  

The extra readings and resources will be useful for this task. You are also encouraged to do  independent research and use applicable scholarly literature in addition to those provided to  you.  

For this assessment, you will need to choose two of the following theories to apply to the case  study: 

• Universal Ethical Egoism  

• Act Utilitarianism 

• Rule Utilitarianism 

• Care Ethics 

• Intuitionism 

• Divine Command Theory  

• Kant’s Duty Ethics 

• Ross’s Prima Facie Duties  

• Nicomacean Virtue Ethics  

• Confucian Role Ethics 

The following is a guide for completing the written paper:  

1. The introduction should identify the case study that you have chosen and the two theories you are going to apply to the case.  

Detailed in criteria 1. 

2. The first section of the body of the paper should detail the dilemmas presented by the case  study. This is where you should provide some ’facts’ around the case which may include  academic material from the additional readings, legislation, policy, scientific/medical evidence,  statistics, government and NGO reports, etc. This is also where any relevant codes of  ethics/conduct should be identified. These should be relevant to Australian professional  conduct – that is, Australian focused codes of ethics/conducts.

Case Studies Assignment Ethics in the Social Sciences Spring 2020 

The evidence presented here will be the foundation of your ethical analysis and is detailed in  marking criteria 2. 

3. Section two of the paper should analyse how your two theories apply to the case. This will  include applying all components of each theory to the case study, the strengths and  weaknesses of applying each theory to the case study and providing consideration of the result  of using each theory for all stakeholders impacted by the case study.  

You can conduct this analysis separately or juxtapose both theories throughout the structure  of the paper; you have creative license in expressing the analysis.  

This section should form the bulk of your paper and is covered in marking criteria 3, 4, and 5. 

4. The final section of the paper should attempt to provide a feasible, workable, and ethical  solution to the dilemma by synthesising the main arguments that have been made throughout  the paper and should particularly draw upon the strengths discussed.  

CASE STUDIES 

1. Sustainable Lifestyle 

According to research conducted by Ted Trainer (2010) at the UNSW, one fifth of the world’s  people (comprised of 'first world' countries like Australia) are living a lifestyle that depends on  using four-fifths of the world’s non-renewable resources. 

Trainer’s research goes on to say that the prospect of the rest of the world’s people ever  catching up is not possible, as it would require vast amounts of resources such as oil that just  aren't there. Even if such resources were available, there are serious problems with the idea  that many more people could live as we do. Rapid species extinction, severe droughts, water  and air pollution and climate change are just some of the many indicators that this lifestyle is  unsustainable for the fraction living it now, let alone everyone.  

Given this context, is our 'first world' lifestyle, that depends on using such a high level of non renewable resources, an ethical way to live? 

2. Community Treatment Orders 

In all jurisdictions in Australia, Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) are used to require a  person with a mental illness to undergo mental health treatment on a non-voluntary basis,  usually under mental health legislation. In NSW, CTOs are usually made by the NSW Mental  Health Tribunal (or occasionally by a Magistrate) to order a person to accept mental health  treatment. CTOs are intended to allow people who would otherwise be required to stay in  inpatient units to instead live in the community and get mental health care in the least  restrictive setting possible. The Tribunal must be satisfied that the person would benefit from  being in a less restrictive setting and has a history of refusing to accept appropriate treatment.  If the person refuses to comply with the treatment plan or experiences a deterioration in their  mental health, they may be in breach of the CTO and potentially be returned to inpatient care  as an involuntary patient. 

Evidence into their use and usefulness is varied and there are two key ethical arguments that  are invoked to support or reject their use. On the negative side, it is argued that they are  coercive and breach people’s human rights. Proponents of this position argue that their use  should either be abandoned or significantly reduced due to its incompatibility with choice and 

evidence that suggests their use can harm long-term recovery for the patients they are  supposed to help. On the positive side, some research suggests that CTOs provide appropriate  resources for continuity of care, facilitating engagement with the wider health care system due  to enforcing the legal requirement on services to provide care. Often, the orders are viewed 

This Community Assignment  has been solved by our Community  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.