Evidence Based Practice Assessment Workbook - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Evidence Based Practice Assessment Workbook (Individual Assessment).
The word limit is 2000 words (+/- 10%).
All answers should be provided in the correct order below (i.e you should start at question 1 and finish with question 25. There are 25 questions in total. You are not permitted to answer the questions in essay format. You are required to provide an answer to each question. Each Answer provided does not need to include the same amount of words i.e.; your answer to some questions might be longer (and include more words) than the answer to other questions.
Please answer the following questions. (15%)
What is meant by evidence based practice?
Why is it important that we use evidence based practice?
Please ensure that your work is supported using appropriate and academic sources.
Please read the research article below and answer the questions.
You should start each section on a separate page.
Please ensure that your work demonstrates critical analysis and is supported using appropriate academic sources.
Hermanson, A. & Åstrandb, L., L. (2020) The effects of early pacifier use on breastfeeding: A randomised controlled trial. Women and Birth, 33, 473-482.
Study Design (25%)
Did the research address a clearly focused research question?
Were the participants clearly identified? Why is this important?
Was the intervention clearly described? Why is this important?
Was the assignment of participants to interventions randomised?
How was randomisation carried out and was it sufficient to eliminate systematic bias?
Was the aim of the research clearly identified and why is this important?
Discuss the reasons why observational studies have found associations between pacifier use and shorter breastfeeding duration, while results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) did not reveal any difference in breastfeeding outcomes.
Were all participants who entered the study accounted for at its conclusion?
Methodological Considerations (25%)
Were the participants ‘blind’ to intervention they were given? Consider the benefits of using a ‘blind’ design.
Were the baseline characteristics of each study group (intervention group and control group) clearly identified?
Prior to collecting data why is important that the questionnaires used, were validated?
Apart from the experimental intervention, did each study group receive the same level of care (that is, were they treated equally)? Why is this important?
Results & Main Findings (25%)
Was a power calculation undertaken?
Were the effects of intervention reported comprehensively?
What outcomes were measured, and were they clearly specified?
Were the results reported for each outcome in each study group?
Were potential sources of bias identified?
Which statistical tests were used?
Were ‘p’ values reported?
Do the benefits of the experimental intervention outweigh the harms and costs?
Were any harms or unintended effects reported for each study group?
Would the experimental intervention provide greater value to the people in your care than any of the existing interventions?
References included (5%)
Examine the reference list and consider any issues of bias that might exist.
Bibliography (5%)

 

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.