Example of suggested content and structural outline for A Structured Literature Review - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

• Abstract (300 words approx.) A succinct synopsis of your study, which details:
•  Aim
•  Background
•  Methods
•  Results
•  Conclusion
• Declaration
• Acknowledgments
• Contents Page
• As applicable:
• List of tables
• List of figures
• List of appendices
• List of abbreviations/Terms of reference

Chapter 1: Introduction (3000 words approx.)
Contextual background for the study; a critical a review of existing the literature, evidencing contemporary knowledge base and current debates; Study’s rationale to conduct the re SLR; leading to establishing the Research Question/Aim and Objectives, Concluding with the relevancy of the review.

•  Critical exploration and evaluation of key literature
•  Identification of key themes within the current knowledge base
•  Identification of gaps in knowledge current
•  Justification for study
•  Short Conclusion

Chapter 2 Methodology (2000 words approx.)
Critical discussion on the systematic processes deployed relevant to types of studies, participants, interventions and outcomes. Key subsection should include:

•  Rationale and research question

o Research question
o Research perspective (qual/quant)
o Research study design
 Search strategy
o Databases
o Keywords/Boolean operators/ subject headings (e.g. MeSH)
o Other search tools (e.g. truncation)
o Delimiters e.g. English language; currency of time period
o Inclusion and exclusion criteria (this should reflect PICO or other framework)
o Identifying eligible studies i.e. screening processes (PRISMA flowchart)
o Data management/storage (e.g. Refworks)
o Link to Appendix where one full search is replicated (e.g. screenshot)

? Data collection and analysis
o Data Extraction - Use of appropriate tools to do this e.g. review-specific data
extraction form
o Methodological quality assessment - use of appropriate tool, score and how it will
be used (i.e. exclusion of studies or just reporting, justify with rationale)
o Data Synthesis - QUALITATIVE SLR should include identification of a framework for
thematic analysis

Chapter 3 Results (5000 words approx.)
Details outcomes in terms of:
? PRISMA flow chart –selection of included studies from database search;

? Characteristics of Included studies (brief); cross- reference to a table/Appendix
o 0ne or more tables with details of participants, intervention/themes, outcome
measures and any other important information.
o Tables need to be described in the text as well as shown in tabular form
? Result of methodological quality assessment -
o discus the generic critique e.g. lacks of detail about blinding;
o cross reference to a table or appendix where full detail is displayed

? Narrative synthesis of results: synthesising the results of outcome measures/themes

o Where possible the results need to be discussed together i.e. Four out of the 6
studies had a large sample size ranging from 50-100 participants, rather than writing
about individual papers. You should try and support all of your results with critical
appraisal. i.e. Large sample sizes are needed for quantitative studies, power
calculations should be used to assess the appropriate sample size.

Chapter 4: Discussion (3700 words approx.)
A critical discussion of the SLR reflecting findings, their implications and the review process
o Overview of the SLR findings
o Overview of Methodological quality /deficits shortcomings
o Strengths and Limitations of SLR
o Comparison of the SLR’s findings with the current knowledge base
o Implications for policy and practice
o Recommendations for further research

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.