First equation – 8y + 90 = 45x
y = (45/8)x – 90/8
Taking x = 12, y = 56.25
Taking y = 0, x = 90/45 = 2
This equation passes through points (2, 0) and (12, 56.25)
Second equation – 45x + 4y = 180
y = (180/4) – (45/4)x
y = 45 – (45/4)x
Taking x = 0, y = 45
Taking y = 0, x = (180/45) = 4
This equation passes through points (0, 45) and (4, 0)
Given points be A(-12, 4) and B(8, -4)
Slope m will be computed as (y2-y1)/(x2-x1) = (-4-4)/(8+12) = (-8)/20 = -2/5
Using equation y = mx + b with point (-12, 4), we will find the intercept b.
4 = m(-12) + b
4 = -12*(-2/5) + b
4 = 24/5 + b
b = -4/5
equation of the line will be y = -2/5x -4/5 slope = -2/5, y-intercept = -4/5 with point (0, -4/5).
Scatterplot A: correlation = 0
Scatterplot B: correlation = -0.99
Scatterplot C: correlation = -0.4
Scatterplot D: correlation = 0.4
Scatterplot E: correlation = -0.7
Scatterplot F: correlation = 0.9
|
Country |
# of Influenza Cases per per 1 mil |
New variable |
Country |
# of Influenza Cases per per 1 mil |
New variable |
|
Argentina |
2140.74 |
77 |
Pakistan |
21.47 |
67 |
|
Australia |
3642.79 |
83 |
Russia |
131.99 |
73 |
|
Brazil |
85.47 |
76 |
South Africa |
127.76 |
66 |
|
Canada |
1139.89 |
82 |
South Korea |
234.99 |
83 |
|
China |
417.44 |
78 |
United Kingdom |
625.05 |
81 |
|
India |
35.27 |
71 |
United States |
4781.93 |
79 |
|
Japan |
76.75 |
84 |
Uruguay |
345.00 |
78 |
|
Mexico |
237.33 |
75 |
|
|
|
Formula for computing correlation
CORREL(Range of influenza cases, range of life expectancy) Correlation coefficient is computed as 0.35
Q1 (Linear forms & intercepts):
Rearrange to slope–intercept form.
Find and verify x-/y-intercepts and two points per line.
Q2 (Line through two points):
Compute slope m=y2−y1x2−x1m=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}m=x2−x1y2−y1.
Use y=mx+by=mx+by=mx+b with a given point to find bbb, then write the equation.
Q3 (Reading correlations from scatterplots):
Assign approximate correlation values and justify sign/strength (none, weak, moderate, strong).
Q4 (Compute & interpret correlation):
Use a spreadsheet function (e.g.,
Report coefficient, comment on linearity strength, direction, and potential confounders/measurement effects.
Clarified scope & rubric:
Matched each question to skills: algebraic manipulation, slope/intercept fluency, visual correlation reading, and quantitative correlation with interpretation.
Q1—Form & intercepts:
Converted 8y+90=45x8y+90=45x8y+90=45x to y=458x−908y=\frac{45}{8}x-\frac{90}{8}y=845x−890 and checked points (2,0)(2,0)(2,0), (12,56.25)(12,56.25)(12,56.25).
Converted 45x+4y=18045x+4y=18045x+4y=180 to y=45−454xy=45-\frac{45}{4}xy=45−445x and verified (0,45)(0,45)(0,45), (4,0)(4,0)(4,0).
Emphasis: careful arithmetic, explicitly showing intercept logic.
Q2—Slope & equation from two points:
Computed m=−820=−25m=\frac{-8}{20}=-\frac{2}{5}m=20−8=−52 for A(−12,4),B(8,−4)A(-12,4), B(8,-4)A(−12,4),B(8,−4).
Found bbb via 4=(−25)(−12)+b⇒b=−454=(-\tfrac{2}{5})(-12)+b \Rightarrow b=-\tfrac{4}{5}4=(−52)(−12)+b⇒b=−54.
Final: y=−25x−45y=-\tfrac{2}{5}x-\tfrac{4}{5}y=−52x−54.
Emphasis: structure (slope → substitute → solve for bbb → final form).
Q3—Interpreting scatterplots:
Assigned: A ≈ 0, B ≈ −0.99, C ≈ −0.4, D ≈ 0.4, E ≈ −0.7, F ≈ 0.9.
Discussed sign (trend direction) and magnitude (tightness around a line).
Q4—Compute and contextualize correlation:
Used CORREL(cases, life_expectancy) → r=0.35r=0.35r=0.35.
Interpreted as weak positive; noted reporting/health-system effects (e.g., advanced systems report more cases and have higher life expectancy) and cautioned against causal claims.
Emphasis: statistical literacy—association ≠ causation; data quality matters.
Presentation polish:
Encouraged clear workings, labeled points, units/contexts, and short justifications beneath results.
Suggested a concluding paragraph synthesizing numeric results with real-world interpretation.
Accuracy: All algebraic rearrangements, intercepts, slope, and line equation were correctly derived and numerically verified.
Interpretation: Correlations were sensibly matched to visual patterns; r=0.35r=0.35r=0.35 was correctly characterized as weak positive with plausible contextual caveats.
Communication: Solutions were structured stepwise, showing workings and brief rationale—aligned with assessment expectations.
Convert between linear forms; determine and verify intercepts and points.
Compute slope and derive a line equation from two points.
Visually assess correlation sign/strength and relate it to numeric rrr.
Use spreadsheet functions to compute correlation and interpret results in context.
Communicate mathematical reasoning clearly and relate findings to real-world data considerations (measurement/reporting bias, non-causality).
Looking for guidance on your academic tasks? You can download the available sample solution to understand the structure, writing style, and approach followed by experts. This resource is designed to give you valuable insights and serve as a reference for your own work.
Important Note: This sample is strictly for reference purposes only. Submitting it directly as your own work may lead to plagiarism issues. Always use it as a study guide to frame your original solution.
If you need a fresh, 100% plagiarism-free, and custom-written assignment tailored to your specific requirements, our team of professional academic writers is here to help. With expertise across multiple subjects and university standards, you can be assured of timely delivery, original content, and high academic quality.
Tailored to your assignment question and guidelines
Written by qualified academic experts
Guaranteed plagiarism-free content with proper referencing
Delivered on time to meet your deadlines
Helps improve grades with professional guidance
Take the next step with confidence—learn from the sample and get expert-written content that truly matches your needs.
[Download Sample Solution] [Order Fresh Assignment]
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.