Highlights
You are appraising a single-family residence located in the Huntington neighborhood at 4632 NW 56th Drive.The property is being acquired by a mortgage applicant andyou have been asked to appraise the property by the lender. Seven potentialcomparable sales were initially identified. However, three of these seven were highly similar to the subject property in their transactional, physical and locational characteristics. You therefore decided to exclude the other four transactions from the
comparable set.
The elements of comparison you used to compare and adjust the sale prices of the comparable properties are listed in the market data grid below. The property rights being conveyed in the acquisition of the subject property are fee-simple absolute. Conventional mortgage financing will be used by the purchaser and the acquisition appears to be an arm’s length transition. Thus, no adjustments need to be made to the sale prices of the comparable properties for the type of property rights conveyed, financing terms, or conditions of sale. However, the buyer of comparable 2 was aware that she would have to replace one of the air conditioning units immediately after acquiring the property; thus, she was able to negotiate a $3,000 price reduction from the seller.
Comparable 1 sold three months ago, while comparables 2 and 3 sold six months ago. Based on your knowledge of recent price appreciation in this market, you have
decided that comparable 1 would sell for 2 percent more if sold today and that comparables 2 and 3 would sell for 4 percent more if sold today. The subject property is
located in Huntington, as is comparable 1. However, comparables 2 and 3 are located in Kensington and Millhoper, respectively. Although Huntington is a high-end
neighborhood, both Kensington and Millhoper are generally considered to be slightly more desirable, In fact, homes in these two neighborhoods generally sell for about a percent price premium relative to similar homes in Huntington.
In these neighborhoods, an incremental square foot of lot size or living area is worth about $20 per square foot and $80 per square foot respectively. Each year of
effective age reduces the value of properties in this market by about $3,000 per year. You experience suggests that each additional half-bath is worth $500; each additional full bath $1,000. Additional garage spaces, wood decks, and pools in these neighborhoods are worth $8,000, $1,000, and $12,000, respectively. No significant non-realty items were included in the comparable transactions and non-realty items are not part of the
acquisition of the subject property.
Based on the above discussion of the elements of comparison, complete an adjustment grid for the three comparable properties. What is the final adjusted price
(indication of the subject’s value) for comparable 1, 2, and 3?
This FIN 353 - Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.