First Peoples’ Health Essay Writing - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

1. Introduction
(5 Marks)
As for Distinction plus – Innovative justification/analysis of essay purpose and intention. As for Credit plus – Components well developed – comprehensive and concise with three or more references provided As for P1 plus
Two references provided
Adequate explanation of purpose and context of the paper. Includes:
Purpose and aims
Overview of main themes
Appropriate use of terms and language
One reference provided Limited introduction
One relevant part omitted. Parts not clea~rly written. No references provided Inadequate/vague explanation of the context of the essay.
Inappropriate use of terms and language
No references provided
Introduction is missing or are unclear/confused.
No references provided
Criteria HD
85% or above Distinction
75 – 84% Credit
65 – 74% Pass 1
55 – 64% Pass 2
50 – 54% Fail 1
40 – 49% Fail 2
39% or below
One contemporary healthcare strategy is discussed with a focus on improving a health issue
(20 Marks)
Innovative, insightful and sophisticated discussion of healthcare strategy. Outstanding understanding of the purpose and likely effectiveness of the strategy. High quality discussion of healthcare strategy. High quality understanding of the purpose and likely effectiveness of the strategy.
A good and detailed discussion of healthcare strategy. Detailed and accurate understanding of the purpose and likely effectiveness of the strategy.
Adequate identification and discussion of healthcare strategy. Adequate understanding of the purpose and likely effectiveness of the strategy.
Limited identification and discussion of healthcare strategy. Limited understanding of the purpose and likely effectiveness of the strategy.
Inadequate identification and discussion of healthcare strategy. Inadequate understanding of the purpose and likely effectiveness of the strategy.
Identification of healthcare strategy is missing or is unclear/confused. No or poor understanding of the purpose and effectiveness of the strategy.
Criteria HD
85% or above Distinction
75 – 84% Credit
65 – 74% Pass 1
55 – 64% Pass 2
50 – 54% Fail 1
40 – 49% Fail 2
39% or below
One health issue experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people is described
(15 marks)
Innovative, insightful and sophisticated discussion of health issue experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Extensive range of sources of evidence used. High quality discussion of health issue experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Comprehensive range of sources of evidence used. Good quality explanation of health issue experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Multiple sources of evidence used. Adequate explanation of health issue experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Effective use of academic literature and core readings. Limited explanation of health issue experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Minimal use of academic literature and core readings. Inadequate explanation of health issue experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Inadequate use of academic literature and core readings. Missing or unclear explanation health issue experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
No or poor use of academic literature and core readings.
Criteria HD
85% or above Distinction
75 – 84% Credit
65 – 74% Pass 1
55 – 64% Pass 2
50 – 54% Fail 1
40 – 49% Fail 2
39% or below
Key demographic, social, or cultural factors that impact on the health issue are described
(20 marks) Innovative, insightful and sophisticated discussion of four or more factors that impact on the health issue.
Extensive range of sources of evidence used. High quality explanation of three or more of the factors that impact on the health issue.
Comprehensive range of sources of evidence used. Good quality explanation of each of three factors that impact on the health issue.
Multiple sources of evidence used. Adequate explanation of two or more of the factors that impact on the health issue.
Effective use of academic literature and core readings. Limited explanation of at least one of the factors that impact on the health issue.
Minimal use of academic literature and core readings. Inadequate explanation of any of the factors that impact on the health issue.
Inadequate use of academic literature and core readings. Missing or unclear explanation of any of the factors that impact on the health issue.
No or poor use of academic literature and core readings.
Criteria HD
85% or above Distinction
75 – 84% Credit
65 – 74% Pass 1
55 – 64% Pass 2
50 – 54% Fail 1
40 – 49% Fail 2
39% or below
Explanation focuses on how one health perspective/effective program/model of care or practice(s) can meet the needs and is more acceptable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
(20 marks) Outstanding explanation of how one health perspective/effective program/model of care or practice(s) can meet the needs and is more acceptable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Comprehensive range of sources of evidence used. High quality explanation of how one health perspective/effective program/model of care or practice(s) can meet the needs and is more acceptable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Extensive range of sources of evidence used. Good quality explanation of how one health perspective/effective program/model of care or practice(s) can meet the needs and is more acceptable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Multiple sources of evidence used. Adequate explanation of how one health perspective/effective program/model of care or practice(s) can meet the needs and is more acceptable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Effective use of academic literature and core readings. Limited explanation of how one health perspective/effective program/model of care or practice(s) can meet the needs and is more acceptable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Minimal use of academic literature and core readings. Inadequate explanation of one health perspective/effective program/model of care or practice(s) can meet the needs and is more acceptable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
Inadequate use of academic literature and core readings. Missing or unclear explanation of one health perspective/effective program/model of care or practice(s) can meet the needs and is more acceptable to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.
No or poor use of academic literature and core readings.
Criteria HD
85% or above Distinction
75 – 84% Credit
65 – 74% Pass 1
55 – 64% Pass 2
50 – 54% Fail 1
40 – 49% Fail 2
39% or below
Conclusion
(10 Marks)
Provides an exemplary summary of key points and excellent summary of the significance of the information provided.
High quality alignment with introduction
Clear and effective summary of key points
Comprehensive outline of the significance of the information provided.
High quality alignment with introduction Good quality summary of main points, clearly expressed.
Includes the significance of the information provided.
Good quality alignment between introduction and conclusion
Summarises most of the main points with adequate clarity.
Includes adequate summary the significance of the information provided.
Adequate alignment between introduction and conclusion
Summarises some of the main points with limited clarity.
Includes limited summary of the significance of the information provided. Limited alignment between introduction and conclusion
Main points of essay not summarised.
Does not include the significance of the information provided.
Poor alignment between introduction and conclusion
Unclear/no conclusion and summary of implications for health care practice.
Criteria HD
85% or above Distinction
75 – 84% Credit
65 – 74% Pass 1
55 – 64% Pass 2
50 – 54% Fail 1
40 – 49% Fail 2
39% or below
4. Overall writing and presentation
(5 Marks) Adheres to all guidelines. Exemplary:
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, vocabulary, spelling
punctuation
use of inclusive language
word limit met
well sequenced
logical flow
Use of 3rd person
Adheres to all guidelines. Excellent:
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, vocabulary, spelling
punctuation
use of inclusive language
word limit met
well sequenced
logical flow
Use of 3rd person Adheres to all guidelines re:
sentence & paragraph structure,
grammar, vocabulary, spelling
punctuation
use of inclusive language
word limit met
sequencing of ideas
logical flow
 

This Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.