Highlights
Task description:
You are required to write an academic essay on the topic listed below. Your essay should follow an essay structure and should flow in a clear and logical manner. You should write the essay in your own words and ensure that you acknowledge the use of literature appropriately.
You need to support your response with appropriate evidence from academic sources and ensure that you reference these sources appropriately in APA 7th format.
You should ensure that you meet the word length limit and proofread your work carefully. You should also ensure that you follow the Fed Uni Guide to Lay-out and Appearance to format and present your essay.
You will receive feedback from your annotated bibliography to assist you in completing your essay.
Essay question:
Choose one client group (from the list below) and justify which foundational social work theory is most suitable for social work practice with this client group. In your response, critically evaluate the use of this theory at the micro, meso and macro levels.
You may choose from one of the following four client groups:
· Young people with disabilities living in nursing homes
· LGBTIQ+ people experiencing loneliness and isolation
· People experiencing homelessness and poverty in regional areas of Australia
· Young people living in refugee camps
Note: if you have another client group that you would like to explore (for example, something that is relevant to your country of origin or your practice experience) then please discuss this with the Course Coordinator. Do not go ahead with a different client group unless you have an email response from the Course Coordinator to give you permission to do so.
Marking criteria & marking guide:
Criteria Marks
Addressing the essay topic, 8 marks
This relates to your ability to address all aspects of the essay topic, the level of detail of your essay, and the clarity of your contention.
Learn how to analyse your assignment topic HERE, about the essay writing process HERE, and about structuring your essay HERE.Addresses all parts of the essay topic clearly and comprehensively. Clear contention. 7 – 8
Addresses all parts of the essay topic clearly and with a good level of detail. Clear contention. 6
Addresses all parts of the essay topic but could have improved clarity and detail 5
Addresses most parts of the essay question but needs a clearer contention and/or greater detail 4
Does not satisfactorily address the essay question 0 – 3
Understanding of topic, 8 marks
This relates to how well you show your understanding of social work theory and apply this to your chosen case study
Shows comprehensive knowledge of the topic and exemplary ability to apply this to the case study 7 – 8
Shows strong knowledge of the topic and very good ability to apply this to the case study 6
Shows good knowledge of the topic and applies this to the case study 5
Shows some knowledge of the topic but needs to improve level of detail and/or application to the case study 4
Does not show satisfactory knowledge of the essay topic 0 – 3
Depth of analysis, 8 marks
This relates to the depth of your critical evaluation, including your ability to include varied theoretical perspectives and consider reasons for and against.
Learn about incorporating evidence using in-text citations HEREDeeply analyses the topic by integrating multiple perspectives and forming connections between ideas 7 – 8
Shows a good level of depth in analysis by considering multiple perspectives 6
Shows a satisfactory level of depth in analysis - could include a broader range of perspectives 5
Describes/explains the topic without adequate analysis – needs to consider multiple perspectives 4
Does not show satisfactory depth 0 – 3
Strength of justification, 8 marks
This relates to your ability to justify your analysis, including your use of appropriate supporting evidence
Shows comprehensive justification and extensive use of high-quality academic evidence 7 – 8
Shows very good justification and uses high-quality academic supporting evidence 6
Shows good justification and makes use of academic evidence – but could improve quality/quantity 5
Shows satisfactory justification and limited use of academic evidence 4
Does not show satisfactory justification and does not use sufficient academic evidence 0 – 3
Essay structure, 2 marks
This relates to your ability to structure your essay appropriately (including introduction, conclusion, clear flow of paragraphs & use of topic sentences)
Learn about essay structure HERE and paragraph structure HEREExcellent essay structure and flow 2
Very good essay structure. Minor improvements needed to improve flow 1.5
Good essay structure including an intro, conclusion and paragraphs. Work on flow & topic sentences 1.25
Satisfactory essay structure. Introduction, conclusion and/or paragraphs need greater clarity and flow 1.0
Structure of essay was not satisfactory. Introduction, conclusion and/or clear paragraphs not included 0 – 0.75
Written expression, 2 marks
This relates to your ability to write in your own words (paraphrase) in academic language with excellent spelling and grammar.
Learn about academic style HERE and academic language HEREExcellent academic written expression in students own words 2
Very good written expression in students own words. Minor spelling/grammatical errors 1.5
Good written expression. Mostly written in students own words. Some spelling/grammatical errors 1.25
Satisfactory written expression. Academic language, paraphrasing and spelling/grammar need work 1.0
Written expression is not satisfactory 0 – 0.75
Referencing, 2 marks
This relates to your ability to correctly use APA format for your in-text citations and reference list
Reference list and in-text citations are all correct for all sources 2
Reference list and in-text citations are all correct for most sources 1.5
Reference list and in-text citations are mostly correct for most sources 1.25
Reference list and in-text citations are included for all sources but contain many errors 1.0
Reference list and in-text citations are not included or are not correct 0 – 0.75
Presentation, 2 marks
This relates to your ability to correctly present your assignment through use of appropriate font, lay-out, spacing, and cover sheet – as outlined in the Fed Uni Guide to Lay-out and Appearance.
Excellent presentation of essay 2
Very good presentation of essay. Minor errors in use of font, spacing or lay-out 1.5
Good presentation. Make adjustments to font, spacing, and/or lay-out as per Fed Uni guide 1.25
Satisfactory presentation. Use appropriate and consistent font, spacing, and lay-out as per Fed Uni guide 1.0
Presentation of essay is not satisfactory. Presentation makes essay difficult to read and comprehend. 0 – 0.75
This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.