Generator Case Study & Appropriate Action - Engineering Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Assignment 1: Part 1 Case Study Generator
The Case Study Generator will automatically allocate one case study to you randomly.
Read and then copy/screenshot the Case Study allotted to you and save it somewhere convenient now so you can refer to it while you are doing Part 2 of the Assignment.  You will need to refer to the case study regularly.
Lastly, and importantly, you need to “Accept this case study as mine for Assignment 1” and check the “Yes” button before you go to “submit”.   
Use the Case Study allotted to you for your responses to Assignment 1: Part 2 Case Study Response, noting the Case Study number and name.  (e.g. 2A RUBY)
Reminder: Copy and paste the case study into a word document before you proceed further. The case study applies to Assignment 1 only and will not be referenced or used in any other assignment in this course. See Assignment 1 Student FAQs for more details.
Top of Form
 
Question 11 pts
Rohan is a public servant. He is a web developer within a department of a state government.  Rohan has been given responsibility for developing a tourism website by the IT Manager Radha. Rohan adds various links to news services to enliven this government webpage. These links include global news channels.  It is later found that those sites sometimes provide news on court cases that are currently under suppression order here in Australia as they are in process. When noticed this causes huge embarrassment to the government department. Radha, the IT manager of the department had not seen the website before it "went-live" but even if she had it is unlikely that she would have noticed and tested every link. In any case, the links were not problematic until a local court case gave rise to a publication suppression order. Radha now needs to determine who should take responsibility and what actions should be taken about the event.  
What professional ethical dilemmas are Rohan and Radha dealing with here?  (e.g.  Should we allow or sanction Rohan's behaviour?  Is there a public interest question raised by this scenario?  What actions do everyone involved need to take to ensure that this kind of situation does not occur again?) 
Copy and Paste the case study above.  
'Click' on the button below to make your declaration and get one point towards your assessment grading.
I accept this case study as mine for Assignment 1
Bottom of Form
Assignment 1: Part 2 Case Study Responses

Assignment 1, Part 2 is broken down into three separate sections.  All three sections are found in the template and are allotted separate pages.  As an MS WORD file students may alter or play with the formatting of this file providing they do not delete required sections.  Make sure you have read all the topics in this Module before attempting to do this assignment.  
Download the “Assignment 1 – Case Study (Response Template)” 
Save the file and name it correctly for submission: 'Student_Name_Assignment 1"
Section 1 – Thomas White’s Framework
This section aims to apply Thomas White's framework to make an analysis of your allocated Case Study. Make sure you have read Topic 3 before attempting this section.
Read the Thomas White article, “Resolving an Ethical Dilemma,” before attempting the assignment.  The article explains the key concepts and processes you will need to use. 
Read your assigned Case Study from Assignment 1, Part 1. 
Use the Template and Thomas White's framework to make an analysis of your individual case study. Note: You need to provide responses in all three fields of the form (1,2, & 3). You should input 350-500 words total in this section.
 
Section 2 – The Governance and Regulatory Environment
This section deals with applying the ACS Code of Conduct and the Australian Regulatory Framework (Legislation and AS/ISO Standards).  Make sure you have read Topic 4 before attempting this section. See additional links to reference materials at the conclusion of these instruction.
Fill in the boxes on the assignment page as per the instructions. 
Cite all the relevant clauses along with each sub-clause applicable to your allocated Case Study. 
 
Section 3 – Justifying a Decision and Recommending Appropriate Action
This section of the assignment focuses on what you think are the most appropriate responses to the dilemma.  Section 3 is your chance to have a say on the issues involved.  You should be brief but to the point here.  We encourage you to reflect here, so don't be too worried about going over the word limit.  You will not be penalized for doing so.
Make short text responses to the five (5) questions in the spaces provided. Each response should be between 50 - 80 words (Total 400 words approx).
Submitting Your Assignment
Once you have completed your responses to all sections of the template you should save the template as a separate file “Student_Name_Assignment 1”.
Click on the “Submit Assignment” button + “Choose File."
Upload your saved file.
Review the Similarity Pledge and check the box indicating that you understand and agree to the pledge.
Click the “Submit Assignment” button.
 
For more detailed instruction, the assessment rubric, ACS Code of Professional Conduct, and more, please visit the links below:
Assignment 1 - Professionalism Ethics and Governance - InstructionsAssignment 1 - Student FAQsdownloadACS Code of Professional Conduct v2.1Australian Laws and ActsApplicable Standards ListISO IEC Standards Relevant to ICTCanvas Student Guide: How to Submit an Assignment (Links to an external site.)Rubric
Assignment 1, Part 2 Case Study Response
Assignment 1, Part 2 Case Study Response
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognizing Ethical Issues in the Case Study 5 pts
Level 4
Develops recognition of issues in the CS to conclusions or productive insight 3.75 pts
Level 3
Engages, assesses, or shows insight, as part of the recognition of issues in the Case Study (CS) 2.5 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates understanding, or appropriate recognition of an issue in the Case Study (CS) 1.25 pts
Level 1
Identifies, recounts, or describes accurately an ethical issue in the Case Study (CS) 0 pts
No Mark
No evidence of having read the Case Study (CS).
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysing Ethical Issues in the Case Study - Using the Thomas Framework (TWF) 5 pts
Level 4
Develops analysis to conclusions or productive insight of ethical issues using the TWF 3.75 pts
Level 3
Engages, assesses or demonstrates insight in analysis of ethical issues using the TWF 2.5 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates understanding or appropriate application of analysis of an ethical issue using the TWF 1.25 pts
Level 1
Identifies, recounts, or describes issues in the analysis of an ethical issue using the Thomas White Framework (TWF) 0 pts
No Mark
No evidence of analysis of ethical issues in the CS
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponding to the Ethical dilemma 5 pts
Level 4
Develops responses into conclusions or productive insight into the ethical dilemma using the TWF 3.75 pts
Level 3
Engages, assesses, or demonstrates insight in a response to the ethical dilemma using the TWF 2.5 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates understanding or appropriate application in a response to the ethical dilemma using the TWF 1.25 pts
Level 1
Acknowledges, recalls, or simply summarizes any of the ethical dilemmas using the TWF 0 pts
No Mark
No evidence of response to the ethical dilemmas in the CS
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifying ACS Code of Conduct Provisions 5 pts
Level 4
Identifies three applicable ACS CoC provisions, sub-paragraphs, and proffers explanation. 3.75 pts
Level 3
Identifies two of the applicable ACS CoC provisions, any of their appropriate sub-paragraphs & proffers comment 2.5 pts
Level 2
Identifies two of the applicable ACS CoC provisions along with any of the appropriate sub-paragraphs. 1.25 pts
Level 1
Identifies any of the applicable 'Values' or ACS CoC provisions. 0 pts
No Marks
No ACS Code of Conduct (CoC) provisions identified
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentifying appropriate Legislation, Regulations, & Industry Standards 5 pts
Level 4
Identifies applicable Legislative and regulatory provisions and proffers explanation. 3.75 pts
Level 3
Identifies multiple applicable regulatory instruments and proffers comment in Section 2 2.5 pts
Level 2
Identifies multiple applicable regulatory instruments in both areas of Section 2 1.25 pts
Level 1
Identifies any applicable Legislative, Regulatory, or Industry Standard 0 pts
No Marks
No Legislation, Regulations, or ISO/IEC standards identified

This Engineering Assignment has been solved by our Engineering Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.