GM702: The Work Demonstrates Clear Knowledge References to Appropriate Academic Literature - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

GRADE DESCRIPTORS

(Distinction ) The assignment evaluated is of a high to exemplary standard. The work addresses clearly and articulately the assignment requirements and thus meets, and satisfies all the learning outcomes (either well or in an exemplary way). The work demonstrates: clear knowledge; references to appropriate academic literature; analysis; critical evaluation; and originality of argument. It is structured and presented to a high (or exemplary) standard. Referencing conventions are fully observed.
60 to 69%
(Merit) The assignment evaluated is of a good to a high standard. Substantial knowledge, comprehension and analysis is evident throughout. Arguments presented are clear and focussed with a logical structure in place. There is clear evidence of critical evaluation of a wide range of theories/perspectives from academic literature and some independent thought. The work is well-written and addresses well all of the learning outcomes. Referencing conventions are fully observed.
50 to 59%
(Pass) The assignment evaluated is of a fair to good standard. Adequate knowledge, comprehension and analysis is evident throughout. The arguments presented have a logical structure and show some critical evaluation in places, although there may be limited evidence of an independent perspective. There is evidence of some good engagement with some of the appropriate literature. Learning outcomes have been largely met and to an appropriate degree. Referencing conventions are observed.
40 to 49%
(Fail/Redo) The assignment evaluated is of a basic standard. The arguments presented have some logical structure and are supported by academic literature in most cases. The academic literature used is outside of the suggestions made in the module guide but remains limited. Little critical evaluation is evident, and the work tends more widely towards a descriptive style. Learning outcomes have been addressed in a basic but satisfactory way. Referencing conventions are mostly observed.
Fail Grades
30 to 39%

• (Module retake) The assignment evaluated is of a limited standard. Limited use of academic literature and as such knowledge and argument is very weak. A simple descriptive style with no evidence of critical evaluation throughout. Over-reliance on simplistic, limited sources. Referencing conventions may not be observed. Some learning outcomes met but in a weak and simplistic way. The work is needs to be developed in greater depth and detail to move to a passable standard at this level of study
• 29% and Below
• (Module retake) The assignment evaluated is of an unacceptable standard. There is little or no evidence of knowledge and understanding that is required at this level. Referencing is inadequate or non-existent. The learning outcomes have not been addressed fully and the work requires significant modification to bring it to a passable standard.
• Operations Management
• Module Description
• The module is designed to help students understand the strategic role of operations management and its competitive advantage for organizational survival. It brings out the relationships between the operations function and other functional areas of a business such as marketing, finance, and information systems and how they can work together to achieve the business strategy.
• Learning outcomes
• LO1. Know the various tools, techniques and apply suitable tools and techniques in different alternative scenarios of Operations Management.
• LO2. Apply information management techniques and evaluate them in context of operational functions to achieve competitive advantage and make the organization globally competitive.
• LO3. Apply and critically evaluate the importance of project management to given business situations (Using PERT / CPM).
• LO4. Demonstrate operations strategy in domestic and global context, and evaluate how the use of technology has impacted the operational functions.
• Expectations
• Materials Access
• All learning materials are provided in the form of a module kit and can be accessed from the Learning Management system (LMS)
• Learning Hours
• Students need to be aware of their commitment requirements in regard to study time. In order to give you an indication of that, we have based the following information on the United Kingdom (UK) Higher Education Quality Assurance Agency guidelines. “The notional learning hours associated with qualifications, programmes and individual units of study are based on a broad agreement across institutions that students can expect to spend 10 hours learning on average in order to gain one academic credit unit” (QAA 2006).
• Re-sit
• If you do not secure a pass, please read closely the feedback and speak with your Course leader(s) or faculty. After consulting the feedback, close attention is essential to rework on the areas of weakness, and then resubmit the work at the next opportunity. As per the QAA requirements, only one REDO is allowed where the marks will be capped at a Pass.
• Plagiarism
• All forms of plagiarism are taken seriously, and any suspected cases will be investigated thoroughly. If a case is found proven then the work will be graded as a fail and the case will be reviewed by the academic committee.
• Student appeals
• There are no re-evaluations as the marks are graded and internally verified before release. However, as per our appeals policy, a student can make an appeal to the course leader which will be then reviewed by the academic committee (please check our academic policies and procedures manual for more information)
• Assignment submission extensions
• Students can apply for extensions via the LMS based on extenuating circumstances (if any) with evidence (proof) as per our extensions policy
• General Guidelines
• Complete the ‘ To be filled by the student section’ in the cover page
• All assignments must be submitted as an electronic document in MS word via the LMS (Use 12 Times New Roman script with 1.5 spacing between lines)
• The results are declared only if the student has met the mandatory attendance requirement of 75% and/or minimum 50 % under extenuating circumstances approved and ratified by the academic committee and the examination board
• The assignment should not contain any contents with references cited from websites such as ukessays.com, styudymode.com, slideshare.net, scribd.com, Wikipedia but should contain references/citations from credible academic journal and articles.
• Submit the assignment in MS word document with the file name being:
• First Name Last Name _ Module Code
• Example: John Smith_GM701
• Checklist
• I have filled the student Information columns below.
• The contents of my assignment have been submitted to Turnitin and I have attached the Turnitin report
• I have strictly followed Harvard Referencing Style and Citations.
•  
• ASSIGNMENT TASK
• Assignment Task 1: [70 Marks] – Report Format
• Word count: Maximum 3600 (+/-10%)
• Read the following Scenario, and prepare a report with the guidelines provided.
• Scenario: The learner is acting as an internal Operations Management expert for a chosen organization (ideally a fortune 500 organisation delivering products or services). Learner is required to look at existing operations management & quality management processes, procedures & systems within the organization, &, evaluate competitiveness of the organization in achieving key strategic objectives both in the domestic and global contexts. Where required, compare with other best-in-class organizations to further support your responses to the different parts of the report.
• Report should include the following:
• Introduction of Chosen Organization briefly stating the organizational objectives that can be linked to Operations and Quality processes. [7 Marks, 400 words]
• Evaluate success of existing operations management processes & quality management processes in achieving chosen organization’s strategic management objectives. You must do this by conducting a review of operations strategy of your organization, exploring both the current & long-term solutions to address the challenges your firm is experiencing. [15 marks, 700 words]
• Evaluate any three tools and techniques of operations and quality management, specifying how they contribute to achieving organizational objectives and competitiveness of your Chosen company in different alternative scenarios of Operations Management, in the domestic and global context:
• [15 marks, 1000 words]
• Discuss how information management system enhances overall business operations of your Chosen organization and analyse the role of ICT applications in Operations optimization in your chosen organisation. Evaluate how operational strategies involving the use of ICT applications help gain a competitive advantage in your chosen organisation? [10 marks, 600 words]
• Discuss how AI can enhance overall business operations of organization in both the domestic and global contexts, while highlighting challenges organization may probably face if implemented. [10 marks, 500 words].

The above Management  Assignment has been solved by our  Management Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.