HA2022 - Business Law - Australian Legal System - Consumer Protection - Law Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed: 

• Explain the various elements of the Australian legal system, such as the  sources of Australian law, the jurisdiction of Federal and State Courts and the doctrine of precedent. 

• Possess a working knowledge of the tort of negligence, contract, consumer protection, insurance and employment law. Prepare, analyse,  and interpret transaction data and financial statements for data-driven  decision- making; 

• Apply the legal knowledge to factual situations, through written and/or  oral communication, to achieve a reasoned conclusion.  

• Develop the ability to identify the relevant legal issues from a factual  situation and the application of statute and case law involves the use of  problem solving and decision-making skills.

Question 1
Required:
In assessing whether a breach of duty of care has occurred, reference is made to the standard of the “reasonable person”. Discuss how the reasonable person standard is
regarded in law and the factors the courts take into consideration when judging the standard of care under both common law and in the civil liability reforms.

Question 2
The case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co Court of Appeal [1893] 1 QB 256; [1892] EWCA Civ 1 was a landmark case from the Nineteenth Century (C19th). Refer to this case when answering the four (4) questions below, which are based on the following scenario:

It is March 2019. Tasmin who is very health conscious is shopping one day and sees in the local chemist a product called ‘Flu Stop’, manufactured by a company called ‘Sydney Flu Shop’. The advertisement for ‘Flu Stop’ states: “Flu Stop is a healthy alternative to the flu injection without needing to go to the doctor for a needle. We offer a money back guarantee and $5,000 to any person who contracts the flu within a reasonable time, after having used the Flu Stop every day for two months according
to the printed directions supplied with each bottle. Proof of receipt of purchase is also required. $5,000 has been deposited at the National Australia Bank, Sydney for this purpose, showing our sincerity in this matter.” Tasmin doesn’t believe in vaccinations and doesn’t want to have a flu injection. The ‘Flu Stop’ costs $70.00. Tasmin buys the product. She follows the instructions for 2 months. In June 2019, after swimming at Icebergs in Bondi, Tasmin succumbs to a cold and then pneumonia. She was very ill and was hospitalised for several weeks. Tasmin contacts Sydney Flu Shop in September to claim her refund and the $5,000. Sydney Flu Shop refuses to pay.

Required:
Answer the following four (4) questions in relation to the case study outlined above. Base your answers on the Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. case, as noted above. Provide appropriate explanations in your answers.
1. Was there a valid offer? 
2. Was there valid acceptance? 
3. What was the consideration? 
4. Was there an intention to form legal relations? 

Question 3
Required:
In order for a party to rely on an exclusion clause, what must they show?

Question 4 
Required:
Discuss what is meant by the term ‘supplier of a service’? Name and briefly explain an example of a guarantee relating to services.

Question 5
Required:
When taking out general insurance coverage, the insured party can choose between: market value, warranty of value, subject to average, or reinstatement or replacement. Explain the difference between each option noted above.

Question 6
Required:
Explain how a valid contract of employment may be created according to both common law and statutory principles governing contract law.

This HA2022 - Law Assignment has been solved by our Law Experts at myassignmentbank.com. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remainsunhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.