HEA93002 - Nursing - Discovery and Enquiry in Health: The Critical Literature Review - Assessment Answer

HEA93002 Discovery and Enquiry in Health: The Critical Literature Review Assessment Answer

Assessment Task:

The aim of Assignment 2 is to produce a transparent, reproducible Method Section for your literature review. You need to provide sufficient information to allow the reader to replicate the entire search process. Furthermore, in replicating the search process the reader should also be able to arrive at the same number of studies that met the inclusion criteria.

Instructions
Identify the databases, search strategy and eligibility criteria used to select included studies. You must also provide some rationale for excluding studies. The three templates that follow have been designed to provide the guidance and structure to assist production of a transparent and reproducible methods section. Each template: the Method template, Database search template (Table 1) and PRISMA graphic (Figure 1), should each be filled in and included in your report. There should be NO introduction and NO conclusion as the assignment is merely the method section of the critical literature review you will complete for Assignment 3. Further guidance is provided in the checklist below, the content and readings. Note, there is a list of Tips for Assignment 2 

Assignment 2 Checklist
Use this checklist to assist completion of a transparent, reproducible method section for your critical literature review. Note, the three templates that follow make up all your report of the method section.
1. Include your problem statement and research question from Assignment 1; if you have revised them, please include those versions
2. Identify all the databases searched. At least four databases related to your discipline need to be explored. The SCU databases are access through the library https://www.scu.edu.au/library/. Note, PubMed and Medline provide relatively similar results, so, it is recommended to use them as alternatives.
3. Identify all search terms in ‘Table 1’ (i.e. using the Database search template that follows).
Search terms can be:
- MeSH,
- Database thesaurus compatible and/or
- Free text

4. Identify all limiters in ‘Table 1’, including a specific time-period of literature search (this can be any period related to the last years based on field of the research and availability of the information. E.g. last 6, 10, 15, 20 years)
5. Define and justify the eligibility criteria:

- the study designs (i.e., specify which quantitative/qualitative/mixed method study designs)
- the nature/type of interventions and/or outcomes (for experimental studies)
- participant characteristics (i.e. the population) and the study setting
- the publication type and language (e.g. original peer-reviewed research articles in scholarly journals published in English)

6. Run and revise search. Undertake first and second cull, as below
7. Explain the process of the first cull of articles. Identify number of duplicates. Identify number of articles rejected based reading on the titles and abstracts; give example reasons.
8. Explain the process of the second cull of articles. Select four or more reasons as applicable, for excluding these studies (may not be for methodological quality). Group the exclusions by reason. This cull should be based on reading the whole (‘full-text’) of the article. An example reason is: “The article’s study designs were inconsistent with the inclusion criteria, for example XXX study design (XXX citation)”.
9. Identify the number of records after database searching and after duplicates removed; these numbers should be the same in Table 1 and in Figure 1.
10. Fill in the templates that follow: The Method template, Database search template (Table 1) and modified PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1). The flow diagram should demonstrate the processes used to arrive at the number of studies you will use in your critical literature review.
11. Provide References in APA 6th style

This HEA93002: Nursing Assessment has been solved by our Nursing experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.