HEAL610 - Methods of Research and Enquiry Assignment

Assignment Task

Ethical considerations

List what the authors describe for potential issues for bias in terms of:

1. Funding sources

2. Conflicts of interest; and

3. Coercion/compensation of participants. Considering what the authors have mentioned about potential bias, do you consider there to be any problem with bias in this study? Yes or No. 

Discuss how two (2) of the following ethical issues were considered in your chosen article:· Informed consent· Avoid unnecessary deception (integrity)· Do good or do no harm (beneficence/ non-maleficence)· Respect anonymity, confidentiality and privacy· Right to refuse or withdraw· Vulnerable groups of people.

Was formal ethical approval obtained for this study? If so, where from?

Trustworthiness

• Trustworthiness of the studyAddress two (2) of the below four aspects of trustworthiness (Session 5):· Credibility (confidence in truth of the finding) · Transferability (applicability to other contexts)
• Dependability (findings consistent and procedure could be repeated) · Reflexivity/confirmability (extent to which findings are shaped by respondents and not researcher bias).
• Transferability (applicability to other contexts)
• Dependability (findings consistent and procedure could be repeated)
• Reflexivity/confirmability (extent to which findings are shaped by respondents and not researcher bias).

Phenomenon of Interest

What was the phenomenon of interest (aim or research question, if stated)? What gaporjustification given to support doing this research?

Design

What was the researchers’ world view, epistemology and methodological approach?(Hint: see session 2) What methods were used to collect the data? What form did the data take? (e.g., numbers, videos, perceptions, photographs, recordings, documents etc.)

How were the data analysed? - The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Choose the best answer to the following questions to demonstrate your understanding of this analysis.

1. When starting to analyse the data, how did the authors know what the content of the interviews was?

• They read over the transcripts several times.
• They remembered from the interviews.
• They sat down and discussed the content.
• How did the authors proceed to code
• They coded each sentence at a time.
• They used metaphors to code.
• They coded the data one transcript line at a time.

2. As the authors were coding the data, what other analytical procedures did they use?

• They only used coding and no other procedures.
• They used field note memos as part of the independent review.
• They wrote reflections, comparisons and ideas as field note memos.

Evaluation

Discussion – According to the author(s), what is oneimplicationfor practice of this study?According to the author(s) or study characteristics, what is one possibility for future research arising from this study?

Describe the main findings/results of the study:How many main themes did the author find? What were these?Under these themes, describe three main reasons the participants gave (there may be more than three listed in the article).

This HEAL610 – Medical Sciences has been solved by our PHD Experts at My Uni Paper.