Health Program Evaluation Methods Address Some Key Evaluation - Medical Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Health Program Evaluation

This assignment is designed to help you focus on what might be required to help you respond to a tender.
You have been asked to provide an expression of interest for one request for tenders from the United Nations Global Marketplace. The United Nations will invite those with the most promising expressions of interests to submit a full application.

I select the tender:
Expanded accelerated AIDS response towards HLM Targets and Elimination commitments in ESA region (https://www.ungm.org/Public/Notice/47519)
The expression of interest for this tender should include the:

• Context to the evaluation and key evaluation questions (Relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability) to be answered (2 marks). Note you are not expected to to go beyond the evaluation documents for this question.
• Methodological approach to answering key evaluation questions (8 marks)
• Link between key evaluation questions and methods (2 marks)
• Evaluation team outlined in terms of the skills required to complete the evaluation according to the proposed methodology and tender specification. Evidence of their ability to complete the evaluation can include but is not limited to qualifications, previous experience with similar projects, organisations and relevant communities and their ability to work together cohesively (8 marks)
• Example—The evaluation team will:
• • Be led by an international senior-level evaluation consultant who at minimum has a Masters qualification…….
• • include qualified evaluators familiar with Timor-Leste’s context and CLTS strategy. They will have experience performing evaluations in low resource countries……..• include technical experts…………………..• involve a cultural educator, as the ethical considerations for this evaluation are that the evaluation team be responsive to the customs, manners, and beliefs of the stakeholders……………….
• • involve personnel with the skills and capability to act as interviewers, facilitators, and scribes…… • include translators due to the fact that multiple languages are spoken in Timor-Leste……• Etc etc …..The rubric for marking each section is included in the table below. Note word limit does not include key evaluation questions or tables.
• If you would like to see the articulation between the tender documents and an evaluation report. The report for Evaluation of Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme (https://www.ungm.org/Public/Notice/74055), an example from last year, is now available (https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/evaluation/evaluation-ntd-report.pdf?sfvrsn=351a363f_2).
• Table 1: Marking Rubric
• Tender specifications Marking rubric
• Key evaluation questions to be answered (2 marks) Key evaluation questions not included 0
• Includes some context and key evaluation questions 1
• Includes comprehensive context and key evaluation questions 2
• Methodological approach (8 marks) Method not specified or does not meet any evaluation specifications 0
• Methods address a few evaluation specifications & there are concerns about feasibility 1
• Methods address a few evaluation specifications & are feasible 2
• Methods address most evaluation specifications & there are concerns about feasibility 3
• Methods address most evaluation specifications & are feasible 4-5
• Methods address all evaluation specifications & there are concerns about feasibility 6-7
• Methods address all evaluation specifications & are feasible 8
• Link key evaluation questions to methods (2 marks)
• No evidence presented that methods address key evaluation questions 0
• Methods address some key evaluation questions 1
• Methods address all key evaluation questions 2
• Teams ability to complete the evaluation based on the method outlined and evaluation specifications (8) No evidence presented that team can complete the evaluation 0-1
• Does not address evaluation specifications 2-3
• Addresses the evaluation specifications & provides a moderate level of confidence team can complete some aspects of the evaluation 4-5
• Addresses the evaluation specifications & provides a moderate level of confidence that the team can complete all aspects of the evaluation 6-7
• Addresses the evaluation specifications & provides a high level of confidence that the team can complete all aspects of the evaluation 8

The above Medical Science  Assignment has been solved by our  Medical Science Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.