Highlight Controversy in the Scientific Literature - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task :

Task:

This distinct series serves to highlight controversy in the scientific literature, allowing a current debate to be captured and evidence to be explored. Two groups of researchers are asked to contribute their conflicting perspectives on a topic of their expertise, and then are subsequently asked to provide a rebuttal to the other groups' proposal. 
You'll find four manuscripts for each debate: 1. A CrossTalk "Proposal" 2. A CrossTalk "Opposing View" 3. and 4. A "Rebuttal" from each author group to the others initial submission. 
From the Journal of Physiology: "By hearing explicit accounts of contradictory viewpoints, the listener gains a better understanding of the source of a controversy. This dialectic process whereby a thesis is advanced, then opposed by an antithesis, and subsequently arriving at a synthesis is a powerful, and often entertaining, method for gaining knowledge and for understanding the source of the controversy." Paterson and Huxley (2012) From http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/iphysio1.2012.235762/full  

The opposing view 
Nybo and Lundby opposes the claim thoI: heat acclimatization improves exercise performance in cool condition. In contrast to study by Lorenzo et al. 2010 they found no change in outdoor bicycle or laboratory ergometer time trial performance or maximal oxygen consumption. There result matched with Lorenzo study when the trails were conducted in heat. There is a need of pre-tests that depicts that subjects have reached their maximum performance from optimized training in order to compare with the results of cooler environment. According to the opposing group, proposal group missed implementation of scientific gold standard design of blinded, placebo- controlled, cross-over trails which accounts for errors in results. Nybo and Lundby also proposed that cyclists who have been training for years in high intensity would not qualify for the results of improved performance due to HA in cool temperature (Karlsen et al. 2015). They also point out that there is no experimental evidence that shows an increase in plasma volume by exercising in cool temperature. 

 

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.