HRMM072 :Career Futures Employability Skills - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

The Assessment Task
Summary:
You are to create an individual reflective portfolio of written work with supporting evidence that demonstrates, analyses, evaluates and critically reflects upon your personal engagement with the stages of finding and securing a graduate-level placement role. You must reflect on how the activities used during the module helped you refine your decision-making processes and how your placement ideas changed between the first and final taught session. A recognised model of reflection should be used where appropriate. It is acceptable to write in the first person because this portfolio is about you!
Detail:
Introduction – as with any introduction, you should briefly outline the Portfolio’s contents and structure and ‘set the scene’ for the reader. What does the portfolio say/show?
Section 1: Ideal Placement Role(s)
From the results/feedback/knowledge you have gained from the range of sources and activities used during the module, identify one or two placement roles that would best support your future career plans*. Reflect on why the role(s) is/are suitable for you, including information on the type of role, the skills/knowledge/personality traits it requires, where it is based and the industry sector. Use the results/feedback/knowledge gained from the sources and activities to provide the rationale for your chosen placement role(s).
Attach all relevant evidence of the sources/activities you have completed which support or underpin your choice of placement role(s) in your appendix, directing the reader to view each item. Do not include evidence of activities that you have not specifically discussed in the main body.
*You may also include copies of relevant placement advertisements in your appendix, if you wish.
Section 2: My key Personal and Professional development Activities
Using subheadings to separate each activity, identify and describe up to five key personal and professional development activities that you have found to be influential in your placement search. Critically evaluate your participation in these activities and analyse the feedback you received, explaining how it helped you understand your own performance in the activity and identify what you may need to improve in the future.
Attach the relevant evidence of your key personal and professional development activities and the feedback received in your appendix, directing the reader to view each item.
Section 3: Reflection on how my decisions, thinking and skills have developed
With your early placement role thoughts in mind and using your weekly reflective journal entries to remind you, critically reflect on, analyse and evaluate how your own thought processes, decisions and skills have developed between the start of the module and now, in relation to securing that ideal placement role. Were your early thoughts realistic and if so, how? If not, what has changed? Reflect on what this module’s activities and the feedback you have received (and any activities you completed outside of the module) have taught you about yourself and your search for a placement. Use a reflective model to structure your writing.
Attach the relevant evidence (eg. screenshots) of your weekly reflective journal which should demonstrate how your thinking, decision-making and skills have developed over time.
As a guide, your Portfolio should include the following sections and approximate word counts. Give your sections appropriate titles:
Section  Content  Indicative word count 
Title page  This page should include the title of the assessment, your name, student number, module code, tutor and actual word count (excluding your appendix and Reference List).   n/a 
Contents page List the title of each section of your portfolio and state which page the section begins. n/a
Introduction  Details shown above. 100
Section 1  Ideal Placement Role(s) 400
Section 2 My key Personal and Professional development Activities 1000
Section 3 Reflection on how my decisions, thinking and skills have developed. 500
Reference List  Your sources/activities should be shown here, in the correct Harvard style.  Include links to webpages for activities. n/a
Appendix Number each item of evidence in the order it appears in your portfolio and give each a title. n/a
Word Limits (where appropriate)
The maximum word limit for this assessment is 2,000 words.
In accordance with the Assessment and Feedback Policy, as stated in section 4.40 where a submission exceeds the stipulated word limit by more than 10%, the submission will only be marked up to and including the additional 10%. Anything over this will not be included in the final grade for the assessment item. Abstracts, bibliographies, reference lists, appendices and footnotes are excluded from any word limit requirements.
In line with section 4.41 of the same Policy, where a submission is notably under the word limit, the full submission will be marked on the extent to which the learning objectives have been met.
Learning Outcomes
The learning outcomes that are being assessed in this assessment are:
On successful completion of the module, with minimal guidance, you will be able to...
a) Identify, analyse and synthesise information from a range of sources, in order to contextualise and reflect upon own placement goals.
b) Critically reflect on, analyse and evaluate own placement decision-making processes and skills, through engagement with structured and ongoing reflection.
c) Critically evaluate own engagement in personal and professional development activities, synthesising feedback in relation to own performance.
Your grade will depend on the extent to which you meet these learning outcomes in the way relevant for this assessment. Please see the grading rubric on NILE for further details of the criteria against which you will be assessed.
Assessment Support
Specific support sessions for this assessment will be provided by the module team and notified through NILE, You can also access individual support and guidance for your assessments from the Learning Development team. The Skills Hub is another useful source of online support for assessments and academic skills.
Academic Integrity and Misconduct
Unless this is a group assessment, the work you produce must be your own, with work taken from any other source properly referenced and attributed. For the avoidance of doubt this means that it is an infringement of academic integrity and, therefore, academic misconduct to ask someone else to carry out all or some of the work for you, whether paid or unpaid, or to use the work of another student whether current or previously submitted.
For further guidance on what constitutes plagiarism, contract cheating or collusion, or any other infringement of academic integrity, please read the University’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy. Also useful resources to help with understanding academic integrity are available from UNPAC..
N.B. The penalties for academic misconduct are severe and can include failing the assessment, failing the module and expulsion from the university.
Assessment Submission
To submit your work, please go to the ‘Submit your work’ area on the NILE site and use the relevant submission point to upload your report. The deadline for this is 11.59pm (UK local time) on the date of submission. Please note that essays and text based reports should be submitted as Word documents and not PDFs or Mac files.
Written work submitted to TURNITIN will be subject to anti-plagiarism detection software. Turnitin checks student work for possible textual matches against internet available resources and its own proprietary database. Work

The above Management  Assignment has been solved by our  Management Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.