Hypothetical Implementation of the Recommended Quality Improvement - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Task
The purpose of this assessment is to further explore the hypothetical implementation of the recommended quality improvement initiative from Assignment 1. 
This second assessment (presentation) will focus on the ‘how' aspects of the quality improvement initiative.
Students will be asked to develop an 8 - 10 minute professional, clear and visually appealing presentation with audible and articulate narration. 
To focus your presentation, the hypothetical audience is the clinical manager(s) of the area in which you (NURSE) propose to implement the quality improvement initiative with the aim of demonstrating why the initiative is important and how you will assure its success, in order to gain the manager’s support.
 
In order to be successful in this assessment task students are required to:
briefly summarise the key aspects of the chosen quality issue (DIAGNOSTIC ERROR) and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored (drawn from assignment 1);identify how implementation of your proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes;apply a quality improvement framework (for example the Plan, Do, Study, Act model) to the proposed quality improvement initiative / strategy;reflect on the clinical leadership qualities required to promote change in practice and discuss the change management processes that could be utilised to implement the proposed initiative; and
appraise the strengths and limitations of the proposed quality improvement initiative.
 
Presentation guidelines:
This assignment is to be submitted in narrated presentation format (eg. narrated slides or video).
Presentation is to be professional, clear and visually appealing with audible and articulate narration and 8 – 10 minutes in length.
Formatting requirements include:
Unit number, unit title, assignment title, student number, total time of the presentation submitted;Reference to resources used to support discussion mentioned within the presentation and / or provided in in-text format within the presentation; and
Reference list provided formatted as per APA 7th edition requirements.
 
Rubric
Clinical Governance Assignment 2: Presentation
Clinical Governance Assignment 2: Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeSummary of proposed Quality Improvement initiative.
Summarises the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored. 5 Pts
Comprehensive
clear and concise summary of the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored. 3.75 Pts
Very clear
and concise summary of the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored with minor error or omission. 3.25 Pts
Clear
and concise summary of the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored with some error or omission. 2.5 Pts
Adequate
summary of the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored but lacks clarity or detail in some areas. 0 Pts
Unsatisfactory:
Does not adequately summarise the key aspects of the chosen quality issue and the aim of the QI initiative to be explored.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeImplementation plan.
Identifies how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes. 5 Pts
Excellent
discussion of how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes. 3.75 Pts
Very good
discussion of how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes. 3.25 Pts
Good
discussion of how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes. 2.5 Pts
Adequate
discussion of how implementation of the proposed quality improvement project can enhance patient outcomes. 0 Pts
 

This Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest disti