ICT205 Software Development Practice Assessment

Instructions

1. Students are required to cover all stated requirements.

2. Your submission must be uploaded to Turnitin as word/pdf file including the below details,

3. Include a title/cover page containing the subject title and code and the name, student id numbers.

• Query successful

Based on the image you provided, here is the text from the assignment instructions:

Assignment Instruction - Read the below carefully before starting the Task,

Part A You are required to discuss one software development methodology that has been widely adopted in healthcare industries and explain the following:

1. Evolutionary

2. Purpose

3. Three advantages

4. Three disadvantages

5. Three limitations.

Part B You are also required to survey from five to eight research papers on a software development methodology and justify what are the three challenges to adopt it by a software development team in an emerging technology project. Emergent technologies refer to Internet of Things, Big Data, Data Analytics, social media, Cloud Computing.

You are allowed to write a 1500 words report 1500 words are excluded from: Table of content Diagrams References

Assessment Marking Criteria

Part A [25 marks]

1. Evolutionary (5 marks)

2. Purpose (5 marks)

3. Three advantages (5 marks)

4. Three disadvantages (5 marks)

5. Three limitations (5 marks)

Part B [25 marks] You are also required to survey from five to eight research papers on the methodology that you choose (15 marks). Discuss the three challenges that the software development team would face to adopt the methodology in an emerging technology project (10 marks).

Assessment Requirements Summary 

This assessment requires students to prepare a 1500-word report (excluding table of content, diagrams, and references) divided into two parts:

• Part A (25 marks): Focuses on a single software development methodology widely adopted in healthcare. Students need to discuss its:

  • Evolutionary aspects

  • Purpose

  • Three advantages

  • Three disadvantages

  • Three limitations

• Part B (25 marks): Involves a literature review of five to eight research papers on a software development methodology. The key here is to identify and justify three challenges in adopting this methodology by a software development team in an emerging technology project (e.g., IoT, Big Data, Cloud Computing).

The submission must be a Word/PDF file uploaded to Turnitin, including a title/cover page with subject details, code, name, and student ID.

Academic Mentor's Approach to Guidance 

The academic mentor approached this assessment by breaking it down into manageable, step-by-step phases, ensuring the student understood each section's requirements and learning objectives.

Phase 1: Understanding the Core Requirements & Methodology Selection

1. Initial Deconstruction: The mentor first ensured the student thoroughly understood the overall word count, submission format, and marking criteria by going through the provided instructions and marking rubric. This clarified expectations for report structure and depth.

2. Part A — Methodology Brainstorm: The mentor guided the student in identifying suitable software development methodologies commonly used in the healthcare industry (e.g., Agile, Waterfall, Spiral, V-model, Lean). They discussed the characteristics of each to help the student select one that offered enough scope for detailed analysis across all required sub-sections (evolution, purpose, pros, cons, limitations).

3. Topic Deep Dive: Once a methodology was chosen, the mentor prompted the student to outline initial thoughts on its evolutionary path, its core purpose, and to brainstorm potential advantages, disadvantages, and limitations. This helped in forming a preliminary structure for Part A.

Phase 2: Research and Content Development for Part A

1. Structured Research: For Part A, the mentor advised the student on how to conduct targeted research for each sub-section. For example, for "Evolutionary," the guidance focused on tracing the historical development and changes over time. For "Purpose," it was about identifying the core principles and goals.

2. Critical Analysis: The mentor emphasized critical thinking when identifying advantages, disadvantages, and limitations. Instead of just listing points, the student was encouraged to explain why these were considered pros or cons, often linking them back to the specific context of healthcare software development.

3. Referencing: Throughout Part A, the importance of academic referencing for all claims and information was continually reinforced to ensure academic integrity.

Phase 3: Literature Review and Analysis for Part B

1. Search Strategy: The mentor provided guidance on developing an effective search strategy for academic databases to find five to eight relevant research papers. This included identifying appropriate keywords related to the chosen methodology and emerging technologies.

2. Paper Selection & Synthesis: The student was advised on how to critically evaluate the selected papers for relevance and quality. The focus then shifted to synthesizing information from these papers to identify recurring themes and three significant challenges in adopting the methodology within emerging technology projects.

3. Justification & Linkage: The crucial step was to justify these challenges using evidence from the research papers, explaining why they are challenges and providing concrete examples where possible. The mentor ensured the student explicitly linked these challenges to specific emerging technologies mentioned in the brief.

Phase 4: Report Writing, Structure & Refinement

1. Report Structure: The mentor guided the student in structuring the report according to academic conventions, including an introduction, separate sections for Part A and Part B, and a conclusion.

2. Word Count Management: Strategies for managing the 1500 - word limit were discussed, including techniques for conciseness, avoiding redundancy, and allocating word count appropriately to each section based on its weighting in the marking criteria.

3. Review and Feedback: Once a draft was ready, the mentor provided constructive feedback on clarity, coherence, argument strength, adherence to instructions, and referencing. Iterative reviews helped the student refine the report.

Outcome Achievement and Learning Objectives Covered 

The step-by-step guidance led to the successful completion of the assessment, addressing all requirements comprehensively.

How the Outcome was Achieved:

• Clarity of Requirements: By breaking down the complex instructions and marking criteria, the student gained a clear understanding of what was expected for each section.

• Targeted Research Skills: The guidance on research strategies for both Part A (methodology details) and Part B (literature review for challenges) equipped the student with effective information-gathering skills.

• Analytical and Critical Thinking: The emphasis on justifying points, explaining "why," and synthesizing information from multiple sources fostered strong analytical and critical thinking abilities.

• Structured Writing: The mentor's focus on report structure and academic writing conventions helped the student organize their thoughts logically and present their arguments effectively.

• Iterative Improvement: The feedback and revision process allowed the student to identify weaknesses in their work and improve upon them, leading to a higher-quality submission.

Learning Objectives Covered:

• In-depth understanding of Software Development Methodologies: Students developed a detailed understanding of a chosen methodology, including its historical context, core principles, strengths, and weaknesses.

• Literature Review and Synthesis Skills: The assessment honed the ability to search for, critically evaluate, and synthesize information from academic research papers.

• Identification and Analysis of Industry Challenges: Students learned to identify practical challenges in adopting specific methodologies, particularly in the context of rapidly evolving technologies.

• Application of Knowledge to Emerging Technologies: The assessment required students to connect theoretical knowledge of methodologies to real-world applications within emerging technological landscapes.

• Academic Report Writing: Students gained proficiency in structuring, writing, and referencing an academic report, adhering to specific formatting and word count requirements.

• Critical Evaluation and Problem-Solving: The task encouraged students to critically evaluate different aspects of software development and propose challenges with justifications, enhancing their problem-solving skills.

Ace Your Grades with Our Expertly Crafted Solutions

Looking for a boost on your next assignment? Our sample solutions are a fantastic resource to help you understand complex topics, see how to structure your paper, and get ideas for your own research.

Please Note: This sample is for your reference and study purposes only. Submitting it as your own work is considered plagiarism and could lead to serious academic penalties.

To ensure you get a top-tier, 100% original submission, trust our team of professional academic writers. They will create a custom, plagiarism-free assignment solution tailored specifically to your needs, guaranteeing authenticity and academic integrity.