ICTICT618 : Manage IP, Ethics and Privacy in an ICT Environment - IT Computer Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

• Ensure access to support that the student has agreed to
• Appropriately structure the assessment
• Provide information or course materials in accessible format, e.g. a textbook in braille
• Changes in teaching practices, e.g. wearing an FM microphone to enable a student to hear lectures
• Supply of specialised equipment or services, e.g. a note- taker for a student who cannot write
• Changes in lecture schedules and arrangements, e.g. relocating classes to an accessible venue
• Changes to course design, e.g. substituting an assessment task
• Modifications to physical environment, e.g. installing lever taps, building ramps, installing a lift
• Explanation of reasonable adjustments strategy used (If required)
• What if you disagree on the assessment outcome?
• You can appeal against a decision made in regards to your assessment. An appeal should only be made if you have been assessed as ‘Not Yet Competent’ against a specific unit and you feel you have sufficient grounds to believe that you are entitled to be assessed as competent. You must be able to adequately demonstrate that you have the skills and experience to be able to meet the requirements of units you are appealing the assessment of.
• Your trainer will outline the appeals process, which is available to the student. You can request a form to make an appeal and submit it to your trainer, the course coordinator, or the administration officer. The AHIC will examine the appeal and you will be advised of the outcome within 14 days. Any additional information you wish to provide may be attached to the appeal form.
• Academic Integrity:
• Academic Integrity is about the honest presentation of your academic work. It means acknowledging the work of others while developing your own insights, knowledge and ideas.
• As a student, you are required to:
• Undertake studies and research responsibly and with honesty and integrity
• Ensure that academic work is in no way falsified
• Seek permission to use the work of others, where required
• Acknowledge the work of others appropriately
• Take reasonable steps to ensure other students cannot copy or misuse your work.
• Plagiarism:
• Plagiarism means to take and use another person's ideas and or manner of expressing them and to pass them off as your own by failing to give appropriate acknowledgement. This includes material sourced from the Internet, RTO staff, other students, and from published and unpublished work.
• Plagiarism occurs when you fail to acknowledge that the ideas or work of others are being used, which includes:
• Paraphrasing and presenting work or ideas without a reference
• Copying work either in whole or in part
• Presenting designs, codes or images as your own work
• Using phrases and passages verbatim without quotation marks or referencing the author or web page
• Reproducing lecture notes without proper acknowledgement.
• Collusion:
• Collusion means unauthorised collaboration on assessable work (written, oral or practical) with other people. This occurs when a student presents group work as their own or as the work of someone else.
• Collusion may be with another RTO student or with individuals or student’s external to the RTO. This applies to work assessed by any educational and training body in Australia or overseas.
• Collusion occurs when you work without the authorisation of the teaching staff to:
• Work with one or more people to prepare and produce work
• Allow others to copy your work or share your answer to an assessment task
• Allow someone else to write or edit your work (without rto approval)
• Write or edit work for another student
• Offer to complete work or seek payment for completing academic work for other students.
• Both collusion and plagiarism can occur in group work. For examples of plagiarism, collusion and academic misconduct in group work please refer to the RTO’s policy on Academic integrity, plagiarism and collusion.
• Plagiarism and collusion constitute cheating. Disciplinary action will be taken against students who engage in plagiarism and collusion as outlined in RTO’s policy.
• Proven involvement in plagiarism or collusion may be recorded on students’ academic file and could lead to disciplinary action.
• Assessment Formatting and Answer length Guidance:
• Your submitted document must follow the given criteria:
• Font must be Times New Roman, Font size need to be 12 and line spacing has to be Single line.
• Your assessment needs to be submitted as an electronic copy unless requested differently by your assessor.
• The Assessment file name for electronic copy should follow :
• Student Id_Assessment_No (Example AHI000014_Assessment 1)
• Referencing
• Include a reference list at the end of your work on a separate page or as footnotes. You should reference the sources you have used in your assessments in the Harvard Style.
• To access a web-based tool, see Harvard Style online generator
• http://www.harvardgenerator.comAssessment Task 1: Written Questions
• Task summary
• This is an open book test.
• Students need to answer all of the written questions correctly.
• Answers must be word processed
• Required
• Access to textbooks/other learning materials
• Computer and Microsoft Office
• Access to the internet
• Timing
• Your assessor will advise you of the due date of this assessment.
• Submit
• Answers to all questions
• Assessment criteria
• All questions must be answered correctly in order for you to be assessed as having completed the task satisfactorily.
• Re-submission opportunities
• You will be provided feedback on their performance by the Assessor. The feedback will indicate if you have satisfactorily addressed the requirements of each part of this task.
• If any parts of the task are not satisfactorily completed, the assessor will explain why, and provide you written feedback along with guidance on what you must undertake to demonstrate satisfactory performance. Re-assessment attempt(s) will be arranged at a later time and date.
• You have the right to appeal the outcome of assessment decisions if you feel that you have been dealt with unfairly or have other appropriate grounds for an appeal.
• You are encouraged to consult with the assessor prior to attempting this task if you do not understand any part of this task or if you have any learning issues or needs that may hinder you when attempting any part of the assessment.
• Written answer question guidance
• The following written questions use a range of “instructional words” such as “identify” or “explain”, which tell you how you should answer the question. Use the definitions below to assist you to provide the type of response expected.
• Note that the following guidance is the minimum level of response required.
• Analyse – when a question asks you to analyse something, you should do so in in detail, and identify important points and key features. Generally, you are expected to write a response one or two paragraphs long.
• Compare – when a question asks you to compare something, you will need to show how two or more things are similar, ensuring that you also indicate the relevance of the consequences. Generally, you are expected to write a response one or two paragraphs long.
• Contrast – when a question asks you to contrast something, you will need to show how two or more things are different, ensuring you indicate the relevance or the consequences. Generally, you are expected to write a response one or two paragraphs long.
• Discuss – when a question asks you to discuss something, you are required to point out important issues or features and express some form of critical judgement. Generally, you are expected to write a response one or two paragraphs long.
• Describe – when a question asks you to describe something, you should state the most noticeable qualities or features. Generally, you are expected to write a response two or three sentences long.
• Evaluate – when a question asks you to evaluate something, you should do so putting forward arguments for and against something. Generally, you are expected to write a response one or two paragraphs long.
• Examine – when a question asks you to examine something, this is similar to “analyse”, where you should provide a detailed response with key points and features and provide critical analysis. Generally, you are expected to write a response one or two paragraphs long.
• Explain – when a question asks you to explain something, you should make clear how or why something happened or the way it is. Generally, you are expected to write a response two or three sentences long.
• Identify – when a question asks you to identify something, this means that you are asked to briefly describe the required information. Generally, you are expected to write a response two or three sentences long.
• List – when a question asks you to list something, this means that you are asked to briefly state information in a list format.
• Outline – when a question asks you to outline something, this means giving only the main points, Generally, you are expected to write a response a few sentences long.
• Summarise – when a question asks you to summarise something, this means (like “outline”) only giving the main points. Generally, you are expected to write a response a few sentences long.
• Assessment Task 1 InstructionsProvide answers to all of the questions below: Complete the table below to identify the legislation relevant to copyright.
• Copyright legislation Purpose
• Complete the table below to identify two types of legislation relevant to intellectual property.
• Intellectual property legislation Purpose
• Complete the table below to identify the legislation relevant to privacy. Identify both the federal act, as well as the act for the state or territory in which you are located.
• Privacy legislation Purpose
• List three ways that a business could choose to communicate new IP, privacy or ethics processes and procedures to staff
• Give an example of a customer service standard or procedures that can be followed to ensure copyright, ethics and privacy.
• Customer service standard/procedure Example
• Copyright Ethics Privacy Identify and explain two typical ICT security systems and procedures that can be used to manage IP, ethics and privacy in an ICT environment.
• System/procedure Explanation
• Assessment Task 1: ChecklistStudent’s name:
• Did the student provide a sufficient and clear answer that addresses the suggested answer for the following? Completed successfully? Comments
• Yes No Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6 Task outcome: Satisfactory Not satisfactory
• Assessor signature: Assessor name: Date: The End

The above IT Assignment has been solved by our  IT Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.