IFN600 - Understanding Research - Convincing and Compelling Argument for the Novelty, Value and Feasibility of a Proposed Research Project - Research Assessment Answer

Assessment Task:

These are the instructions for IFN600 Assignment 3. In this assignment, you will write a complete research project proposal in the same way that real-life research applications are submitted to the government, industry, philanthropic and academic research organisations. Your task is to write a research proposal which presents its case clearly, concisely, accurately and in a professional style as if applying for resources to support a worthwhile research project. To be successful a research proposal must provide a compelling, convincing argument for the novelty, value and feasibility of the proposed project. 
Specifically, your task is to write a full research proposal which convinces the reader that: 
1. You have identified an important research problem worth investing time 
and resources to solve; 
2. You have identified a novel, answerable research question whose solution 
will make a substantial contribution to solving the overall problem; 
3. You have developed a feasible, practical methodology for answering the re- search question, using contemporary tools and techniques and reasonable resources; 
4. At its conclusion your project will deliver tangible outputs of significant 
value to the project’s sponsor; and 
5. Your project will generate new knowledge of general and lasting value for current practitioners and/or future researchers. 
In order to convince the reader of these points your argumentation must be: 
• Clear — Your writing must be easily understandable by a lay reader, avoid- ing uncommon terminology and abbreviations. 
• Concise — You must express your ideas efficiently so that key points are not obscured by irrelevant material. 
• Coherent — Your arguments and the conclusions you draw must be structured logically. 
• Convincing — The overall “story” you tell must be compelling and believable. 
In particular, the assessment criteria for this assignment emphasise the coherence of your argument. In previous assessment items, you have developed many of the individual components needed for your proposal, but in this assignment, all these components must fit together in a logical way that is readily apparent to the reader. 
Finally, as usual, the technical aspects of the proposal must be easily comprehensible by a layperson. It should not be necessary for the reader to be an expert in the particular technical field to appreciate the aims and value of the project, or to see that the proposed methodology is appropriate to answer the research question. 

Specific requirements 
Your submission document needs to include the following major sections and include the elements listed. You may choose to add other subsections, but keep in mind the need to keep your writing concise and the overall document as short as possible. Work will be graded on quality, not quantity. 
Most important of all, the linkage and coherence between the different sections is a major assessment criterion for this assignment. Sections that do not fit together to form a logical overall argument will not receive a high grade, regardless of their quality in isolation. 
1. Identification 
• Ensure that your name and student number appear at the beginning of the document. 
• Provide a project title which gives the reader a clear indication of the nature of the research to be conducted. 
2. Problem Statement 
In this section, you must clearly explain what general research problem motivates your research project. In particular, the novelty and value of the proposed re- search must be made clear through appropriate citations to previously-published research on closely-related topics. Keep in mind that you are writing for a lay reader who is not necessarily an expert in the field. 
This section must cover at least the following points. 
• State clearly what the overall research problem is, in terms understandable by a lay reader. Any necessary background needed to understand the problem must be explained, citing peer-reviewed literature as appropriate. In doing so, define or identify the nature of the topic, issue, or area of concern as well as key terms or constructs used in the problem statement. In particular, any underlying assumptions about the nature of the problem should be detailed. In addition, the research problem must have a clear IT-related aspect. 
• Explain briefly what is currently known or understood about this problem, citing peer-reviewed literature as appropriate. 
• Explain why it is necessary to do research into solving this problem, especially by pointing to gaps in our current knowledge or understanding, using the literature to support your argument as necessary. The importance or value of solving the problem must be made obvious. In addition, clearly, state the new knowledge that will eventuate. 
It’s expected that around one to two pages of text will be required to complete this section thoroughly. 
3. Research Question 
In this section, you must clearly state the specific research question to be answered by the research project. Include any explanations necessary for the reader to understand the question in isolation, e.g., to explain specialised terminology. At least the following points must be covered, either in the question itself or in the surrounding explanation. 
• How answering the research question would contribute to solving the research problem must be clear. Answering the research question is not expected to solve the whole problem, but it should, for example, help understand the nature of the problem, help identify the causes of the problem, help develop new ways of solving the problem, etc. Be as specific as possible concerning the way the question’s answer will help solve the main problem. 
• You must explain why you believe this question has not been answered before or cannot be answered easily using existing knowledge. In other words, what makes this research question new and necessary? Cite relevant literature as needed to support your claim for the project’s novelty. 
• The nature of the new knowledge, understanding or insight answering the question will produce must be obvious. 

This Research Assessment has been solved by our Research Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.