ISL271: Purification of the Heart Assessment

ASSIGNMENT 2

QUESTION FOCUS/TOPIC: Compare Al Ghazel’s method for treatment of disease of the heart (through actions) with one other scholar.

• Prepare to present for 10 minutes.
• Prepare for a Q & A and discussion with class for another 5 minutes following the presentation.
• Upload your presentation via Assignment portal in Bright space before 5.00pm on the day of the presentation. 

TASK:

Presentation and Discussion

Your lecturer will provide you with a list of questions to choose from. Each student in that seminar must choose a different question. Please note that there will be a variety of questions to choose from. You are expected to present your presentation via Zoom.

Questions will be related to the module topics covered in weeks 3 to 12. Depending on the question you choose, you will present the week that the topic is covered in the seminar. Your presentation is expected to take 10 minutes and you will then need to answer specific questions asked by the lecturer as well as your peers and continue the discussion for another 5 minutes. 

Students must provide proper referencing in accordance with the Chicago Style 16th edition, by including direct links to all online sources and specifying exact page numbers for any cited material, including paraphrased content. Please note that sources will be randomly verified by the marker to ensure academic integrity. As per the marking rubric, significant marks will be deducted if page numbers or links are missing or improperly cited.

Content

• Choose a topic you are comfortable with or one that you want to explore further.

• Ensure your answer directly addresses the set question without diverting into unrelated areas.

• Use relevant and credible sources specific to the question.

• Refer to scholarly views when discussing concepts, then critically analyse them.

• Be familiar with all your sources so you can apply them in both your presentation and discussion.

• Prepare a written text beforehand to help structure your talk and clarify your main ideas.

• Make sure you are well-prepared to handle open and relevant questions from your lecturer and seminar group.

Presentation Format

• Presentation length: 10 minutes (allowed range: 9–11 minutes). Presentations 2+ minutes over the limit will be penalised.

• Be ready for an additional 5-minute discussion after your presentation.

• Use appropriate visual aids, such as PowerPoint slides.

• Slides should be clearly structured with a maximum of 4 points per slide.

• Upload your PowerPoint slides ahead of time via Brightspace Assignments.

• Use the sources provided on the subject site; you may also include relevant CSU library sources.

• Provide proper Chicago 16 referencing for all sources used, including citations on the slides.

Content: You should feel comfortable with the topic you choose or it should be an area that you would like to further expand your knowledge.
Presentation format: Your presentation should be 10 minutes. 1 minute under and over will not accrue any penalties. There will be penalties for 2 and more minutes over the required 10 minutes.

Content: Ensure you answer the question without diverting into other areas. Diverting into unrelated areas will waste your allocated time.
Presentation format: You must also be able to keep the discussion for another 5 minutes and adequately answer the questions asked by your lecturer and seminar group.

Content: Ensure you use the sources relevant for that particular question. The nature of the topics is such that they are not always open to speculation. When discussing concepts, you should refer to scholarly views on those matters and then critically analyse those views. Be familiar with your sources.
Presentation format: We encourage you to use appropriate visual aids for your presentation. 

Content: Always prepare a written text before you present. This will help you structure the presentation and crystallise the main ideas.
Presentation format: Please use PowerPoint Presentation, ensure it is clearly structured. Generally, you should have no more than 4 points per slide. Upload your PPT ahead of your presentation via Bright Space Assignments.

Summary of Assessment Requirements

The assessment required students to prepare a 10-minute presentation comparing Al Ghazāl’s method for treating the “disease of the heart (through actions)” with another scholar’s perspective. This was to be followed by a 5-minute Q&A and discussion with the lecturer and peers.

Key requirements included:

• Choosing a topic aligned with personal interest or knowledge area.

• Addressing the question directly without diverting into unrelated areas.

• Using credible scholarly sources relevant to the question.

• Referring to and critically analysing scholarly views.

• Preparing a written text to structure the presentation.

• Creating a PowerPoint presentation (no more than 4 points per slide) and uploading it via Brightspace before the deadline.

• Providing accurate referencing in Chicago 16th style, with page numbers and direct links for online sources.

• Being prepared to answer questions and sustain discussion confidently.

Step-by-Step Guidance by the Academic Mentor

The academic mentor worked with the student through a guided process, ensuring each stage of the task was clear and well-executed:

1. Understanding the Question

   • The mentor first explained the focus of the task: to compare Al Ghazāl’s method with another scholar.

   • Together, they clarified key terms such as “disease of the heart” and its treatment through actions.

   • The student was encouraged to select a suitable comparative scholar whose work would allow for a meaningful analysis.

2. Structuring the Content

   • The mentor helped the student outline the presentation into logical sections:

     1. Introduction (topic, relevance, aim)

     2. Al Ghazāl’s method (core ideas, actions, philosophy)

     3. Comparative scholar’s perspective

     4. Critical analysis (similarities, differences, insights)

     5. Conclusion (key findings, reflection)

3. Research and Sources

   • Guidance was provided on locating credible sources from the CSU library and subject site.

   • The mentor stressed the importance of Chicago 16 referencing with page numbers and links.

   • The student was encouraged to read selectively but critically, highlighting passages relevant to the comparison.

4. Drafting and Writing

   • The student prepared a written text for the presentation.

   • The mentor reviewed drafts, ensuring that arguments directly addressed the question and avoided unnecessary diversions.

   • Feedback emphasized clarity, critical analysis, and linking back to the assessment requirements.

5. PowerPoint Development

   • The mentor guided the student in preparing slides with concise points (no more than four per slide).

   • Visual aids were suggested (diagrams, quotes, or key concepts) to strengthen engagement.

   • Slides were reviewed to ensure proper referencing and clear structure.

6. Practice and Delivery

   • The student rehearsed the 10-minute presentation under the mentor’s guidance.

   • Attention was given to timing, pacing, and clear explanation of scholarly views.

   • The mentor simulated a Q&A session, helping the student practice answering open and critical questions.

Outcome and Learning Objectives Achieved

By following this process, the student produced a well-structured and critically informed presentation that:

• Met the 10-minute time requirement and included a clear introduction, body, and conclusion.

• Presented a balanced comparison between Al Ghazāl’s ideas and another scholar’s perspective.

• Demonstrated the use of credible sources with correct Chicago 16 referencing.

• Engaged with the topic critically rather than descriptively.

• Delivered slides that were visually clear and concise.

• Showed confidence in handling discussion and Q&A.

Learning Objectives Covered

• Developing the ability to research and critically analyse scholarly perspectives.

• Applying proper academic referencing standards.

• Structuring and delivering an academic presentation within strict time limits.

• Using visual aids effectively to support communication.

• Enhancing skills in academic discussion and critical questioning.

Get Access to Expertly Written Assignment Help

Looking for guidance on how to structure and present your assignment? You can download the sample solution provided here to understand the right approach, formatting, and research depth expected at university level.

Important Note on Academic Integrity
This sample is meant strictly for reference and study purposes only. Submitting it as your own work may lead to plagiarism issues and academic penalties.

If you need a 100% original, plagiarism-free, and custom-written solution tailored to your specific requirements, our team of professional academic writers is here to help. We provide fresh, well-researched, and properly referenced assignments that meet your deadline and match your academic level.

Why Choose a Fresh Solution?

• Written from scratch, tailored to your topic and instructions

• Guaranteed plagiarism-free content with Turnitin report on request

• Properly referenced in your required citation style

• On-time delivery with free revisions to ensure quality

• Support from experienced academic mentors across diverse subjects

Take the smart route: learn from the sample, but submit only your own original work.

Download Sample Solution
Order Fresh Assignment