ITECH1001: Discussion of S.O.A.R Model - IT Assessment Answer

ITECH1001

Assessment Task

The group report contains three parts, these being the writing of a group literature review, a review of group processes and a reflection on the time estimation sheet completed for assignment 2 in assignment 1. ITECH1001
1) Group task - The group is required to work collaboratively to produce a collated literature review on the selected topic. There are a number of tasks to complete and these are outlined below.
2) Individual tasks
a) Each member of the group is required write a report reviewing the performance of the group.
b) Each member of the group is required to write a reflection on the time estimation task for the group report that was completed in assignment 1.
The group report is to be submitted via TurnItin. Further details regarding the use of TurnItIn will be provided during class.
Overview
1) The group is to meet on a regular basis, both within and outside of class. Brief details of these meetings should be recorded including date and time of meetings, who attended, and a short paragraph detailing what was discussed. This information is to be included in the appendix of your group report.
2) The group is required to use at least one form of groupware technology to assist in the sharing of information. For example: a discussion forum within Moodle, Facebook, Google Docs, Drop box, Trello or any other suitable form of groupware. A review of the groupware used (2-3 paragraphs) should be
included in the appendix of your group report. ITECH1001
3) The group is required to redevelop the initial mind map that was developed for the annotated bibliography. The new mind map should take into account the readings of all of the group members. A copy of the final mind map is to be included in the final report. ITECH1001

4) The group is required to write a literature review on the topic that they have selected and should be structured according to the outline below. The report should read as if it was written by one person, ie the fonts, formatting and tone of voice of the writing should be the same for each section. In order to complete the report the following tasks are required to be undertaken:
a) Each student is to write a 1000 to 1500 word literature review on their section of the mind map. This piece of writing may be based upon the reading undertaken to complete the annotated bibliography as well as on any extra resources that have been sourced.
b) Each group member’s writing should be proof-read for use of reference material, typing, spelling and grammatical errors by another member of the group and the writing generally reviewed in a constructive manner. The review can take a number of forms including:
i) A marked-up copy of the commentary with suggested changes to be made; and/or
ii) Two to three paragraphs indicating the suggested changes and improvements.
iii) A review done by each member of the group is to be include in the final report.
c) Each student should revise their writing using the review provided by the group member. Note: you need only amend your work if you feel the feedback is appropriate.
d) Each student should include a discussion of their selection, organisation and association or materials based on the S.O.A.R model.
i) Selection: why you selected those particular materials
ii) Organisation: how you organised the information from your resources in your report and why.
iii) Association: how your resources relate to each other and if there were gaps in the information you found
iv) Regulate: reflect on how using this methodology impacted on your research and writing experience.
e) Each student should review the time estimation exercise done for the second assignment as part of assignment 1 and write 1 -2 paragraphs on the impact of the exercise on your research and writing experience.
5) The group should collate their final pieces of writing into a single report. Each individual literature review should have a heading indicating the topic and author.
6) The group is to write an introduction and a conclusion for the report.

This ITECH1001 IT Assessment has been solved by our IT experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.