LAW 610 : Deportation for Persons Designated as Prohibited Immigrants - Law Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT TO FINAL EXAMINATION
This assessment constitutes 100% of the total marks towards the final examination component. This marks will not be made known to the students.

INSTRUCTIONS
The assessment is due on 11th June 2021 at 11.59pm.
The assessment is to be typed in the font Times New Roman, font size 12, spaced 1.5, all pages to be numbered, title page is mandatory as such each page should have a header and a footer except for the title page.
Please upload word format on the Moodle.
Insert your ID Number on all the pages of the assignment in the Header.


Originality The ability to think independently and creatively in the answers given. 20%
Reference Making reference to relevant legislation (laws); case laws and legal articles. 10%

Alternative Exam Question
Question 1
Explain what the objectives of accountability are and the mechanism employed to effect it.
Use specific and significant examples to illustrate the utilisation of those mechanism in Fiji.
[1000 Words][10 Marks]
Question 2
There are mechanisms that are provided within the laws of Fiji that ensures accountability and transparency on the part of government officials.
In the Immigration Act 2003 Fiji (the Act), two distinct process are applied for deportation for persons designated as prohibited immigrants under section 15 and deportation under Part 7 of the Act.
In your answer you are to explain why there is two different procedures applied. Does it ensure accountability and transparency or not? You may cite recent cases and other legal resources to support your answer.
[1000 Words][10 Marks]
Question 3
The Constitution of Fiji, 2013 establishes several constitutional officers. Out of the many one is the Electoral Commission that was established under the State Services Decree 2009 and then recognised by the 2013 Constitution in section 75 and 76 respectively.
The Electoral Act 2014 provides the specific powers of the Electoral Commission and all the Officers including the Supervisor of Elections established under the Act.
Scenario
The Electoral Commission has directed the Supervisor of Elections to carry out a specific direction, but the Supervisor of Elections refuses to do so on the premises that its office is independent of the Electoral Commission.
You are to argue whether the Electoral Commission or the Supervisor of Elections are correct in the stance they have taken and the resulting implications.
You are to substantiate or support your answer by reference to relevant laws and case laws.
[1500 Words][20 Marks]

The above LAW 610   Law Assignment has been solved by our  Law Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.