LAW 79603: International Business Transactions and Law Assessment

Questions

1. Jamie, a wedding dress designer and manufacturer based in Sydney NSW, orders 1,000 bolts of high-quality silk from a Chinese company Ying Pty Limited (Ying) a well know silk manufacturer in China. Jamie and Ying have no established business relationship. The parties agree that the purchase price is $500,000 Australian dollars.

The parties agreed that the contract will incorporate the incoterm Free on Board (FOB) and that the goods to be shipped not later than 1 March 2024.

Payment to be by documentary letter of credit, the contract contains the following terms relating to payment:

• The buyer will open a documentary letter of credit with a reputable Australian Bank.
• The documentary letter of credit will be for an amount of $500,000 Australian dollars.
• The seller will provide the following commercial documents: clean bill of lading, commercial invoice and proof of origin documents.
• The Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits 600, applies to the documentary letter of credit and all matters related to the payment.

The Master of the vessel issued a clean bill of lading on 1 March 2024, which showed the name of the shipper and consignee, a description of the goods being shipped and the quantity of the goods, the method of transportation, and the date of shipment as required.

Jamie, applied for a documentary letter of credit from the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia appointed the Merchant Bank of China as the confirming/negotiating bank. The Commonwealth Bank of Australia did not conduct a solvency check on Jamie.

The following documents were provided to the Merchant Bank of China for payment on 17 March 2024; clean bill of lading showing a shipping date of 1 March 2024, a commercial invoice which describes the goods as 1000 bolts High Quality Silk, a certificate of origin stating- Silk Fabric, there is no certificate of insurance.

The Merchant Bank of China makes the payment to Ying Pty Ltd and seeks reimbursement from the Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

The vessel carrying the silk sank in the South China Sea on 10 March 2024. No cargo was salvaged from the vessel.

Ahmed an employee of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia on receiving the request for reimbursement from the Merchant Bank of China decides that prior to making the payment he will inspect the silk to ensure that it is of high quality. On arriving at the Port of Botany he is advised that the vessel carrying the silk sank in the South China Sea on 10 March 2024.

On 18 March 2024 Jamie declares himself bankrupt by filing a debtor’s petition.

Ahmed advises the Merchant Bank of China that the Commonwealth Bank will not be reimbursing the money paid for the following reasons:

• The buyer of the goods has become bankrupt and is unable to pay the Commonwealth Bank the amount of the letter of credit.
• The Merchant Bank of China should have contacted the Commonwealth Bank before making the payment to confirm the money was available from the client for payment to the buyer and acted negligently in not doing so.
• Ying Pty Ltd was not entitled to be paid the purchase price for the goods at the time they presented the letter of credit as the goods had not been received by the buyer.

Advise the Commonwealth Bank in detail:

• Discuss the obligations of an issuing bank and a confirming/negotiating bank under the documentary letter of credit payment system.
• Does the bankruptcy of its customer Jamie, relieve the Commonwealth Bank from its obligations under the documentary letter of credit.
• Ahmed has established that the goods were not received in Australia, does the failure of the goods to arrive in Australia have any importance to payments to be made under the documentary letters of credit payment regime.

2. Young Steel Pty Ltd an Australian company has entered into a contract with Auto Makers of USA Pty Ltd for the supply of 1 ton of premium quality steel for the contract price of $500,000 Australian dollars. There was no formal written contract, the agreement was made through an exchange of emails between the parties.

Other relevant terms agreed by email are:

• The incoterm will be FOB (2020)
• Payment to be made on presentation of the commercial documents, including a clean bill of lading and commercial invoice.
• The purchaser will open an irrevocable letter of credit with a reputable bank in Texas.
• UCP 600 is incorporated into the contract.
• The steel is to be properly packaged and loaded on a vessel nominated by the buyer before 1 May 2025.
• Any dispute is to be settled by arbitration. The arbitration to take place in Singapore before an arbitral panel of 3 legal experts.
• The law to be applied to the contract is the law of NSW.

The buyer discussed with their bank, the Commercial Bank of Texas, the procedure for the issuing of an irrevocable letter of credit the beneficiary being Young Steel Pty Ltd in the amount of $500,000. The letter of credit had not issued by 1 May 2025.

The buyer nominated the ship “Steel Bee” leaving the Port of Sydney on 1 May 2025 as the vessel for carrying the cargo.

The master of the vessel issued a clean bill of lading to the seller of the goods which was signed and dated as required, all documents were in order.

On arrival in Texas, the buyer advised the seller that due to the increase in tariffs on goods coming into America that it would not take possession of the steel and advised the seller that the steel should be returned to Australia, the buyer refused to pay the purchase price.

The seller advised the buyer that it was entitled to payment under the contract and demanded that payment be made within 7 days.

The buyer refused to make the payment and advised the seller that the increase in the tariff imposed on goods entering the USA made the purchase of steel from Australia uneconomical.

The seller asked that the matter be referred to arbitration in accordance with the contract.

The buyer advised the seller:

• That any arbitration would be invalid and unenforceable and that they would immediately seek to have the award set aside as the number of damages would be too complex for an arbitral panel to calculate.
• There is no agreement to go to arbitration as the parties did not enter into a formal contract.
• The dispute should be determined in a court in the USA and the law of Texas would apply to the contract.

Advise the seller;

• What is required for an arbitration clause to be found to be enforceable and is there an enforceable arbitration clause between the parties.
• What are the grounds on which an arbitration award can be set aside by the Courts, do these grounds include complexity of facts and or calculation of damages.
• Is there any Convention or Treaty which prevents the buyer commencing legal proceedings in the USA (State of Texas) and if the buyer does commence legal proceedings does the seller have any legal avenues to prevent the court in Texas deciding the matter.

Assessment Brief 

1. Letters of Credit / Documentary Payment (Jamie v Ying / Commonwealth Bank):
   • Explain issuing bank and confirming/negotiating bank obligations under a documentary letter of credit regime (UCP 600 applies).
   • Analyse whether the buyer’s bankruptcy relieves the issuing bank (Commonwealth Bank) of its reimbursement/obligation.
   • Assess whether non-arrival (loss) of the goods affects documentary payment obligations. Apply INCOTERMS (FOB), the documentary credit independence principle, and facts (shipment date, presentation date, lack of insurance, sinking on 10 March 2024).
2. Contract Formation / Arbitration & Forum (Young Steel v Auto Makers):
   • Advise whether the parties have an enforceable arbitration clause given exchange-of-emails terms (FOB, UCP 600, arbitration in Singapore, law of NSW).
   • Explain grounds on which an arbitral award can be set aside (and whether “complexity of facts or damages” is a ground).
   • Identify international instruments and procedural steps that affect the buyer commencing proceedings in Texas (e.g., whether the seller can prevent Texas courts from determining the dispute; options such as stay applications or enforcement under international conventions).

Mentor-Guided, Step-by-Step Approach (how the student was coached)

Step 1 Clarify issues & map facts to legal topics

• Mentor asked student to separate factual timeline and label key legal issues: (a) documentary credit law (UCP 600 + independence), (b) risk transfer (FOB), (c) insolvency effects, (d) documentary compliance, (e) arbitration clause formation and enforceability, and (f) international enforcement/anti-suit remedies.
• Student produced a chronology (shipment 1 Mar, sinking 10 Mar, documents presented 17 Mar, bankruptcy 18 Mar).

Step 2 Research the legal framework and identify authorities

• Mentor directed student to primary sources to cite in the answer: UCP 600 provisions on bank obligations and document examination; INCOTERMS on FOB risk transfer; principles on independence of credits and banks’ obligation to pay on compliant documents; statutory/arbitral law governing arbitration agreements, and the New York Convention/UNCITRAL instruments relevant to cross-border arbitration.
• Student collected relevant case law and textbook principles to support each point.

Step 3 Issue-spotting and structured legal analysis

For Letters of Credit:

• Mentor emphasised the independence principle banks deal with documents not goods. Student structured the answer to: (i) duties of issuing bank; (ii) duties of confirming bank; (iii) documentary compliance test; (iv) effect of buyer bankruptcy; (v) effect of loss of goods and absence of insurance; (vi) practical and equitable defences (fraud/irregularity).
  For Arbitration / Jurisdiction:
• Mentor coached the student to test (i) whether emails form a binding arbitration agreement; (ii) whether the clause specifies seat/seat effect (Singapore) and governing law (NSW); (iii) procedural remedies against parallel court action (stay/anti-suit/recognition); (iv) statutory/Convention grounds for setting aside an award.

Step 4 Drafting problem answers with practical recommendations

• Mentor reviewed draft answers to ensure each legal assertion was followed by factual application (e.g., because documents were presented and on their face complied, banks’ payment obligations arise).
• Draft included recommended practical steps the Commonwealth Bank (or the seller) could take (e.g., verify documentary compliance, consider fraud indicators, seek legal advice before refusing reimbursement; for seller: seek arbitration in Singapore and injunctive relief if appropriate).

Step 5 Presentation & referencing

• Mentor advised clear headings (Issue, Law, Application, Conclusion), and inclusion of authorities and conventions. Student finalised submission with properly cited law and a concise conclusion to each question.

Key Legal Conclusions the Student Was Guided to Reach (concise)

Q1 Documentary Credits (Jamie / Ying / Commonwealth Bank):

• Issuing vs Confirming Bank Obligations: Issuing bank must honour or reimburse payment when beneficiary presents documents that comply strictly with the credit terms; a confirming (negotiating) bank that adds confirmation assumes independent liability to pay the beneficiary and then seek reimbursement from the issuer. Banks are concerned with documents, not the underlying goods.
• Bankruptcy of Buyer: The buyer’s insolvency does not automatically relieve an issuing bank of its obligations under a documentary credit. The bank’s primary duty is to examine documents and pay if they comply bankruptcy of the applicant generally does not void the bank’s obligation.
• Loss of Goods / Arrival: Under the documentary credit rules, non-arrival of goods does not automatically defeat a bank’s obligation if documents are in order. The independence principle separates documentary compliance from actual receipt of goods. Practical exceptions may exist (documentary fraud, material discrepancies, or if bank can show a fundamental fraud). The absence of a certificate of insurance is a commercial risk (buyer may suffer loss), but it does not, by itself, invalidate a complying presentation.
• Practical implication for Commonwealth Bank: If documents complied, the bank likely remains liable to reimburse the confirming bank; refusing reimbursement because the buyer is bankrupt or because goods were lost would be legally risky unless there is documentary non-compliance or established fraud.

Q2 Arbitration & Forum (Young Steel / Auto Makers):

• Enforceability of Arbitration Clause: An arbitration clause can be enforceable even if formed by emails provided there is clear agreement on arbitration (seat in Singapore, 3-member panel). Writing via electronic communications is typically sufficient where law requires writing. The clause specifying arbitration in Singapore and applicable law (NSW) supports enforceability.
• Grounds to set aside an award: Courts set aside or refuse enforcement only on limited grounds (e.g., lack of jurisdiction, serious procedural irregularity, public policy, fraud). Complexity of facts or difficulty in quantifying damages is not a ground to set aside an award.
• Preventing Texas litigation / international enforcement: While a party can commence court proceedings in another jurisdiction, the seller can apply to Texan courts to stay proceedings or compel arbitration if US law applies and the arbitration agreement is binding (e.g., under the FAA). International treaties (notably the New York Convention) require recognition and enforcement of arbitration agreements and awards across contracting states and support the efficacy of arbitration. The seller may also seek anti-suit relief depending on forum law. The buyer’s unilateral court action in Texas is not necessarily barred, but it is contestable and there are procedural remedies to enforce the arbitration clause and have the dispute arbitrated in Singapore.

Outcome Achieved (what the student produced)

• A clear, well-structured answer that: identified the legal principles, linked them to the timeline and facts, and reached reasoned conclusions on bank liability and arbitration enforceability.
• Practical recommendations and procedural options were provided for the Commonwealth Bank and for the seller (Young Steel), together with discussion of likely judicial responses.
• References to UCP principles, Incoterms (FOB risk allocation), documentary credit independence, and international arbitration enforcement mechanisms were integrated to meet academic marking criteria.

Learning Objectives Covered

• Apply commercial law principles to complex fact patterns involving documentary credits and international sales.
• Interpret and apply UCP/Incoterms and explain the interaction between shipping terms, risk transfer and documentary duties.
• Demonstrate issue-spotting and IRAC-style legal reasoning, linking law to facts and concluding with practical advice.
• Understand arbitration law and international enforcement, including formation of arbitration agreements, limited grounds for setting aside awards, and cross-border remedies.
• Develop written legal communication skills appropriate for stakeholder advice (banks, merchants, and litigants).

Get Inspired by This Sample – But Submit Only Original Work

Looking for ideas to structure your own assignment? You can download this free sample solution to understand how professional writers approach research, analysis, and academic formatting. Use it to improve your understanding and build a strong foundation for your own work.

Important: This sample is provided for reference and learning purposes only. Submitting it directly as your own work can lead to plagiarism issues and academic penalties.

If you want a fresh, plagiarism-free, and custom-written assignment, our expert academic writers can create a solution tailored to your topic, university guidelines, and word count requirements. Every paper is written from scratch and delivered with a plagiarism report for complete peace of mind.

Why Choose a Fresh Assignment Solution?

• 100% original and plagiarism-free content
• Written by qualified academic experts
• Customized to your specific requirements
• Delivered on time with free revisions included
• Enhances your grades and academic understanding

Take the next step confidently:

Download Sample Solution  Order Fresh Assignment