LAW5002: Renee Bell against BetEasy Pty Ltd - Law Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 

Regard should be had to the Suggested grading descriptors for postgraduate assignments and take-home exams set out on page 8 of the LAW5002 Unit Guide (“Assessment Criteria”) 

1. Logical structure and concise writing is critical - Assessment Criteria aspect 3. Subheadings should be used to delineate the structure. Moreover, the assignment has a 3000-word limit. Students will compromise their ability to fully engage with the question by using up valuable word space with unnecessarily lengthy quotes from or summaries of cases, legislation or other source material. The key is to use source material in a cogent and concise manner.

2. Evidence of careful reading of referenced sources (whether cases, statutes or secondary matter) is critical - Assessment Criteria aspect 1. It is always apparent when student work is merely the product of rehashing the analysis of others.

3. This is a legal research task first and foremost - Assessment Criteria aspect 1. Legal research requires students to independently undertake their own exploration for sources and to select matter intelligently. In particular, those sources should be used carefully and the reasons for their selection should appear in a cogent way. It is always apparent when scattergun or slavish accumulation of sources/references is undertaken by students.

4. However, the essay should also prosecute contentions on where the student stands on the question set, where the student's stance is clearly informed by the reading of sources -- whether those sources are explicitly referenced in the reading guide, the prescribed books or the question, or have been assimilated by independent student research. The question that has been specifically set requires specific engagement so that structure, reading, research and contentions must be directed to that question. So that in this instance a broad, general essay on unfair contract terms under ACL Part 2-3 might be a fine essay but if it fails to engage with the question set it will not be assessed highly - Assessment Criteria aspect 2.

5. A high-quality student paper will exhibit careful adherence to the AGLC style guide, correct syntax and a clear legal writing style.

TASK 

You are a law clerk working in the office of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). Your manager, Kim, has come to you to with a task to undertake a research memorandum on a possible application of Part 2-3 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) to online wagering contracts. Kim’s briefing below sets out some background to the task. 

Kim had read this news article concerning the commencement of litigation brought by Renee Bell against BetEasy Pty Ltd

This LAW5002: Law Assignment has been solved by our Law Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.