Highlights
Learning Outcomes
a) Identify and analyse the tax treatment of various types of incomeand deductions.
b) Effectively apply taxation law in determining tax outcomes in various scenarios such as partnership, trust and company structures
c) Small business entity (SBE) concessions
d) Identify and calculation of capital gains tax (CGT), including CGT event A1 happening on disposal of an asset, the CGT discounts, the CGT consequences of death (estate planning) and the main residence exemption (and its application to investment properties), the availability of CGT concessions for small business, roll-overs, deemed disposals and gifts.
Context:
This assessment allows students to solve practical problems that arise from a fact scenario and to give appropriate advice to clients.
Instructions:
• This case study must be presented as a group effort. The case study requires collaboration of effective team work. It is expected students will take parts and survey the relevant literature, including decided cases, and select appropriate additional resources.
• Your case study is not just a list of answers. Your reasons for your conclusions and recommendations must be based on your research into the relevant cases and legislation.
• With respect to each case study:
• Advise the best investment option for clients from the facts of the case study
• Identify the appropriate legal principles that requires discussion in the case study
• Apply the law to the facts of the case study
PART A: CASE 1 – Married young couple
Matt and Miranda Murphy are an Australian married couple who live in Gold Coast, Queensland with their 3 children and Matt’s father.
Matt and Miranda plan to purchase some assets and wonder which way is best to optimise their tax obligations on various investments. They have visited your office to seek advice to optimise their tax obligation in relation to the following investment situation.
1) Regarding Share Investment Matt and Miranda jointly purchased shares in Citybank Ltd on the 20th of June 2017 at a cost of $110,000. The shares have a market value on the 1st of June 2020 of $120,000. The shares have returned fully franked dividends of $28,000 each year over the past 3 years.
When Matt and Miranda purchased the shares, they were both employed full-time. Miranda now works part-time and is occupied with caring for the child and father in law.
Matt is an engineer who earns $150,000 per annum (net of all allowable deductions) from his sole trading work and Miranda is a part time teacher, earning $10,000 per annum (net of all allowable deductions) from her teaching job.
They are considering selling the shares and re-acquiring them in Miranda’s name only.
Required
Assuming the share price is stable in June at a market value of $120,000 and with an increase to $121,000 in July, which of the following options would you recommend for them to minimise their tax obligations? Justify your answers.
a) Not to sell shares at all
b) Sell the shares on the 30th of June 2020 and re-acquire them on the 30th of June 2020 c) Sell the shares on the 1st of July 2020 and re-acquire them on the 1st of July 2020.
Determine which one of the above options would minimise total net tax payable for both options above for the tax year ended the 30th of June 2020 and 2021 (after medicare levy/surcharge and eligible tax offsets)? Calculate how much tax would be saved. They are not covered by private health insurance.
2) Regarding Rent
3) Regarding Business structure
Matt Murphy is considering a change of his business structure from the sole trader to another structure commencing on the 1st of July 2020 (starting from a new financial year).
He has provided you with the following financial and other family details.
Matt is earning $150,000 (net of deductions) per annum from his engineering business. Miranda earns $10,000 (net of deductions) from her teaching job.
They have the following family members living with them.
• Robert Murphy: Matt’s father who is 70 years old. He has retired from his job as chief executive officer of Suncorp Ltd on the 15th of July 2020 (gross income was $2,000) and has not been earning any income since retirement. Miranda takes care of him as his health has deteriorated recently.
• Jean Murphy: 19-year-old son. He is a full time university student, currently no income. • Xavier Murphy: 15-year-old son, full time high school student
• Megan Murphy: 2-year-old daughter.
Matt is considering the following options.
• Remaining Sole trader stucture
• Partnership with Miranda in equal profit sharing ratio
• Australian registered private company
• Discretionary Family Trust
Required
Please advise which business structure would you recommend in order to minimise tax on the client’s income.
Comment on the tax implications of each business option considered.
4) Regarding Trust and Asset distribution
Matt seeks advice from you on the following matter.
Robert (Matt’s father) had provided significant financial support during their marriage. The support was provided significantly through Trusts that had been set up by Robert himself for Matt, Linda and their children. The Trusts were discretionary and were completely controlled by Robert. Miranda made no financial contribution to the trust assets such as the house which had been utilised by Matt and Miranda during their marriage. There were no significant assets other than the house which had been provided by Robert, and the assets owned by the Trusts set up by Robert who has complete control and discretion.
PART B: CASE 2 – taxpayers at retirement age
Trex Muller, aged 58, recently retired from his employment as chief accountant of Moon Light Pty Ltd, after 17 years and 4 months of service. Trex’s wife Belinda, aged 59, is currently running a small newsagency. Trex and Belinda visited you to seek an advice on various retirement planning options specified below. Trex and Belinda both are covered by private health insurance.
1) Regarding Trex’s Termination payment
Trex received the following payments from his employer;
Gross salary from employer from the 1st of July 2018 to 30th of May 2020 $47,000 Employee Share scheme (taxable, taxed-upfront schemes not eligible for reduction) $6,500 Genuine redundancy payment received on the 30th of May 2020 $53,000 Unused annual leave $26,000 Unused long service leave $2,800
Advise Trex how much tax is payable on the above termination payments. Assume no deductions to claim. You must clearly identify any ETP tax offset.
2) Regarding Trex’s Termination payment & Superannuation
Trex currently has superannuation valued at $582,000 with the Suncorp (complying Super fund). The total amount includes the following elements
Tax free component $25,000
Element untaxed in the fund $207,000
Element taxed in the fund $350,000;
Required
Advise him what would be the tax consequences of withdrawing his super prior to his retirement age, including all options available to him.
This LAW6001 - Law Assignment has been solved by our Law Experts at My Uni Paper.Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.