Highlights
Purpose: To develop in-depth understanding of legal principles and apply critical reasoning to Public Law .
Essay Topics - Choose ONE
Essay Topic 1
In 1992 then Prime Minister Paul Keating referred to the Senate as “unrepresentative swill”.
Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 4 November 1992, 2549 (Paul Keating, Prime Minister).
Is this a valid criticism of the Australian Senate? Support your answer by reference to the Constitutional provisions relating to the Senate as well as the impact of political parties in relation to these provisions.
Essay Topic 2
“One of the clear learnings from the same-sex marriage plebiscite was that there is a strong case for clarifying the rules around the function and operation of plebiscites in Australia”.
Appleby, Reilly and Grenfell, Australian Public Law (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed, 2019), 169.
Does the use of plebiscites support or threaten Australian representative democracy? Answer by reference to the concept of representative democracy and the function and operation of plebiscites.
Essay Topic 3
“Williams v Commonwealth (2012) 248 CLR 156 … can be viewed not only as a turning point in our understanding of Commonwealth executive power, but also as a turning point for parliamentary accountability and federalism in Australia.”
Glenn Ryall, “Williams v Commonwealth – A turning point for Parliamentary Accountability and Federalism in Australia?” Papers on Parliament No. 60. March 2014.
This LAWS107 - Law has been solved by our Phd experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.