LAWS6006 : Analyse the Principles and Concepts of Core Intellectual Property Rights - Law Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Learning Outcomes
LO1: analyse the principles and concepts of core intellectual property rights
LO2: apply intellectual property principles to transactional contexts
LO3: interpret and critique emerging trends in intellectual property law
LO4: integrate and solve IP issues and reflect on their implication(s)
Assignment Instructions
Question:
Should Intellectual Property rights (such as copyright, patents and trademarks) exist? In your answer discuss the advantages and shortcomings of Intellectual Property Rights and give examples in your answer.

• Guidance: The essay invites you to explore intellectual property as a policy concept and critically analyse the value of intellectual property in the modern world, looking at both developed but also developing countries.
• Referencing must be in accordance with AGLC (a copy of which is available under the myReadings tab).
• A starting Point:
• Please find below some articles that will provide you some further background and understanding (you can cut and paste the urls):
• Andrew Beckerman-Rodau, ‘The problem with Intellectual Property Rights: Subject Matter Expansion’ (2011) 13(1) Yale Journal of Law and Technology http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=yjolt
• United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation ‘Intellectual Property Rights’ (n.d.) http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002322/232208E.pdf Page 25 onwards
• Reichman, ‘Does IP Harm or Help developing countries’ (2007) Journal of Law, Technology and Policy https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2569&context=faculty_scholarshipRubric
• Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
• Style (10%)
• Clear, coherent and concise writing style
• Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation
• Correct and appropriate use of referencing The paper is well written, clear and coherent and The is void of any grammatical and spelling mistakes This paper is generally well written and well explained although some further clarity would have been good in parts. A few grammatical and spelling mistakes can be found. The paper communicates concepts effectively. Some grammatical and spelling mistakes can be found. The paper communicates main concepts, however further clarity needed places. A number of grammatical and spelling mistakes can be found The paper is not well explained and struggles to communicate main concepts and arguments. A significant number of grammatical and spelling mistakes can be found.
• Structure (10%)
• Coherent and logical structure
• Description followed by critique of applicable concepts/theory The paper is well structured and demonstrated strong logic, coherent argument, with very minor logical fallacies. The paper is well structures and demonstrated strong logic, coherent argument, with very few logical fallacies. A logical structure is present, but some logical fallacies can still be found. A skeletal logical structure is present, but the paper is marked by a lack of a rigorous logical flow. Although an embryonic logical structure is present, the paper is still highly confused.
• Understanding (50%)
• Demonstrates accurate understanding of legal issues
• Demonstrates accurate understanding of the applicable concepts/theories
• Deals effectively with complexity of issues
• Demonstrates critical thought A nuanced, deep and insightful independent argument is present. The paper shows a very advanced understanding of the issues raised by the essay question. An advanced independent argument is present. The paper shows a good understanding of the issues raised by the essay question. An independent argument is present. The paper shows an understanding of the issues raised by the essay question. Further depth, and insight would improve the paper further. An independent argument is present, albeit not a particularly advanced and/or nuanced one. The paper shows a general understanding of the issues raised by the essay question. Further engagement with a range of issues raised by the essay question is required. An independent argument is somehow present, but is unclear. The paper fails to demonstrate appropriate depth, understanding or insight in relation to the essay question.
• Research (30%)
• Makes reference to unit materials as appropriate
• Make reference to scholarly articles outside of the prescribed course materials Excellent use of all relevant ideas, doctrines, etc.
•  
• All points have been properly and aptly supported by the use of relevant sources.
• All sources have been properly acknowledged Good use of all relevant ideas, doctrines, etc.
• Points are well supported. More nuanced sources and a more strategic use of these sources (with appropriate quotations) would strengthen the paper further. Appropriate, but not particularly advanced use of all relevant ideas, doctrines, etc.
• Most points are supported by the use of relevant sources and most sources are properly acknowledged
• A number of important ideas are missing but this does not completely dismiss the overall argument.
• Relevant sources are present and basically acknowledged A more advanced and consistent use of source materials is necessary to improve the paper. The paper is poorly supported and relevant evidence is often missing.
• Ideas and doctrines from the unit content are used inappropriately and/or crucial ideas are missing.
• Grading Standards
• Fail: The student's performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.
• Pass: The student's performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area. The student's performance could be described as satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the learning requirements specified.
• Credit: The student's performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts. The student's performance could be described as better than satisfactory or adequate or competent or capable in relation to the learning requirements specified.
• Distinction: The student's performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student's performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.
• High Distinction: The student's performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student's performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.

The above  LAWS6006  Law Assignment has been solved by our  Law Assignment  Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.