Highlights
Section A – Multicriteria Decision Analysis
You are acting as a consultant for an estate agency in data analysis tasks that enhance decision making. A client of the agency would like to invest in a buy-to-let property in England. Five properties have been selected, based on filtering, that match both the profile of potential tenants and the needs of the client. The details are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1. Property investment alternatives
|
Property location |
Noise during peak hour(db) |
Price (x1000 pounds) |
Sq.metres |
Rooms |
Area price growth in 5 years |
Amenities nearby |
|
Salford Quays |
70 |
260 |
125 |
3 |
0.06 |
2 |
|
Newcastle Bridge |
65 |
325 |
120 |
4 |
0.03 |
3 |
|
Gunwharf Quay |
60 |
420 |
165 |
5 |
0.07 |
3 |
|
Liverpool Docks |
65 |
465 |
160 |
5 |
0.08 |
4 |
|
Canary Wharf |
50 |
1500 |
200 |
4 |
0.1 |
5 |
This investment decision will be based the following criteria.
In line with the client’s preferences, price and noise should be minimised, whereas size, number of rooms, projected price growth and nearby amenities should be maximised.
In the modelling stage, assume a linear preference function for all criteria, with the indifference and preference thresholds set to 0 and maximum pairwise difference accordingly. This can be done by setting the two sliders entirely to the left and right in Smart Picker Pro.
Q1. After you have conducted a survey about your client’s preference, you find that her pairwise criteria preferences are as follows:
Table 2. The client’s pairwise criteria preferences are given below:
|
|
Noise |
Price |
Sq.m |
Rooms |
PPgrowth |
Amenities |
|
Noise |
|
(2.0) |
(3.0) |
(2.0) |
(3.0) |
3.0 |
|
Price |
|
|
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.0 |
5.0 |
|
Sq.m |
|
|
|
3.0 |
(2.0) |
5.0 |
|
Rooms |
|
|
|
|
(3.0) |
4.0 |
|
PPgrowth |
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Amenities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2. Using the weights assigned to each of the criteria, which you have obtained from Q1, and the data from Table 1, set up relevant parameters in the Smart Picker Pro software according to the objective (Maximise/Minimise), and produce your analytical results. You are required to answer the following questions:
When submitting your coursework, you should also submit your result tables and graphs.
Section B – Statistics and Regressions
The task is to model, or analyse, the following case study:
The annual premiums charged for car insurance for 10 car drivers are shown in the following table. The age of the customer, the number of years that they have not made a claim and their annual mileage are also shown in the table below:
|
Driver |
Insurance Premium (£) |
Age of Driver |
No. of “No Claims Years” |
Annual Mileage Driven (thousands of miles) |
|
1 |
1,100 |
17 |
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
900 |
19 |
2 |
9 |
|
3 |
1,000 |
21 |
1 |
4 |
|
4 |
750 |
23 |
6 |
6 |
|
5 |
800 |
28 |
2 |
13 |
|
6 |
620 |
36 |
3 |
16 |
|
7 |
500 |
46 |
11 |
12 |
|
8 |
550 |
48 |
4 |
18 |
|
9 |
421 |
62 |
10 |
6 |
|
10 |
250 |
72 |
20 |
5 |
(So, for example, a value of 4 in the miles driven column would mean that the customer drives 4,000 miles per year)
You are required to analyse the data above using the Microsoft Excel software. For parts (c-e) below, do not use the standardised Excel functions – instead you should use Excel to apply the relevant formulas learnt in the course. Specifically, you should answer the following questions:
Now do a regression analysis using the Excel Regression Tool with Insurance Premium as the dependent variable, and Age of Driver, No. of “No Claims Years” and Annual Mileage Driven as the independent variables. You will produce estimation result tables and graphs (i.e., regression coefficients and model fit statistics) to support your answers based on data in the table above.
Section C – Monte Carlo Simulation
Danske Haldor is a Dansh boatbuilder, based in Copenhagen. The company is currently evaluating a proposal to invest in producing a new type of inshore rescue boat. Two possible boat designs, Type A and Type B, have now been developed, each of which is expected to have a five-year sales life, before a radical redesign would be required. The Type A design would require an investment of one million krones (DKK), while the Type B would require an investment of two million krones. The expected cash flows of the boat types if there was no inflation (i.e. today’s values), are as follows:
|
Item |
Type A (K000’s) |
Type B (K000’s) |
|
Sales |
1,900 |
2,890 |
|
Materials |
850 |
1,250 |
|
Labour |
200 |
350 |
|
Overheads |
500 |
650 |
The net cash flows for each boat type are estimated as revenues (sales) minus costs. These net cash flows can be assumed to arise at the year-ends of each of the five years. Specific annual inflation rates have been estimated for each of the cash flow elements:
|
Sales |
4% |
|
Materials |
3% |
|
Labour |
7% |
|
Overheads |
6% |
Furthermore, the sales, materials, labour, and overheads for each boat type were estimated using various pieces of information. The sales for each boat type, for example, may not be precisely as estimated above because of various uncertainties. For this reason, they decided to use probability distributions to allow for a range of possible values for the above variables. The associated distribution for each variable and the parameters for each probability distribution are given in the following tables (in K000):
|
|
Triangular Distribution |
|
|
Pert Distribution |
||||
|
Sales |
Min |
Most likely |
Max |
Materials |
Min |
Most likely |
Max |
|
|
Type A |
1700 |
1900 |
2400 |
Type A |
800 |
850 |
900 |
|
|
Type B |
2600 |
2890 |
3200 |
Type B |
1000 |
1250 |
1800 |
|
|
|
Discrete Probability Distribution |
|||||||
|
Labour |
Type A |
Type B |
||||||
|
x-values |
180 |
200 |
230 |
250 |
320 |
350 |
450 |
520 |
|
p-values |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
|
Normal Distribution |
|
|
Overheads |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
|
Type A |
500 |
50 |
|
Type B |
650 |
70 |
Finally, the cost of capital is 10 per cent per annum. However, there is a 20% probability that the company will take a loan to finance the development of the boat types. If that happens the cost of capital will drop to 8 per cent per annum.
This Statistics have been solved by our PhD Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient in providing a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, the UK, and the US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well-trained to follow all marking rubrics and referencing styles.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.