1.Explain why the following graph is not bipartite. Show that, by removing a single edge, we can make it bipartite.

2. Do there exist trees with the following degree sequences? If you answer “yes”, you should explicitly write down a tree. If you answer “no”, you should justify why it is impossible. (a) 4, 4, 2, 2, 1 (b) 2, 2, 2, 2, 0 (c) 3, 2, 1, 1, 1 (d) 2, 1, 1, 1, 1
3. A connected, simple graph ???? has degree sequence 5, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3.
4. Consider the following syntax graph:

5. Complete the following run of Dijkstra’s algorithm rooted at the vertex ????. At each step, you should indicate the vertex you have selected to add to the spanning tree, as well as the vertices you have removed from the fringe. Illustrate your final spanning tree on a copy of the graph.

1. (a) Run Euclid’s algorithm to determine the greatest common divisor ???? of 602 and 217. (b) Now run the extended Euclidean algorithm in order to find integers ???? and ???? such that
???? × 602 + ???? × 217 = ???? .
2. A class of 30 students has 15 students from Senegal, 10 students from Tanzania and 5 students from Uganda. A committee of 6 students is required.
This assessment required students to demonstrate their understanding of key Graph Theory and Discrete Mathematics concepts through a set of structured questions. The tasks were designed to assess the ability to apply theoretical knowledge to problem-solving scenarios using logical reasoning and mathematical justification.
The key components covered in the assessment included:
The assessment aimed to evaluate not only computational skills but also the student’s ability to explain mathematical reasoning clearly, justify each answer, and apply algorithms accurately.
The academic mentor guided the student through the assessment by structuring the learning and problem-solving process in logical, progressive steps to reinforce conceptual clarity and analytical thinking.
The mentor began by revising the definitions and properties of bipartite and Eulerian graphs. The student was encouraged to visualize the given graph, identify odd-length cycles (which violate bipartite conditions), and explore how removing one edge could resolve the issue. For the Eulerian path, the mentor explained how to identify vertices with odd degrees and demonstrated that removing one edge can result in exactly two vertices of odd degree, satisfying the Eulerian path condition.
In this part, the mentor revisited the handshaking lemma and the property that the sum of degrees in a tree equals 2(n1). The student practiced verifying each given degree sequence and constructing valid trees when possible, thereby strengthening reasoning skills in graph construction and logical proof.
The mentor explained how to determine the number of edges using the formula Sum of degrees=2E\text{Sum of degrees} = 2ESum of degrees=2E and then applied Euler’s formula (V E + F = 2) to find the number of faces. The mentor emphasized conceptual understanding of planar graph constraints and how degree distribution affects planarity.
To build algorithmic reasoning, the mentor illustrated how inorder, preorder, and postorder traversals correspond to different expression formats. The student converted a syntax tree to bracketed expression and then derived its RPN using postorder traversal, followed by stack-based evaluation for verification. This step linked theoretical graph structures with computational implementation logic.
The mentor guided the student through each iteration of Dijkstra’s algorithm, identifying the vertex with minimum tentative distance, updating neighbors, and constructing the shortest-path tree. The student was encouraged to represent each step in a table for clarity and accuracy.
The mentor reviewed both the standard Euclidean method for finding GCD and its extended form for obtaining coefficients (s, t) satisfying s×a+t×b=gcd(a,b)s \times a + t \ × b = \text{gcd}(a,b)s×a+t×b=gcd(a,b). This exercise reinforced procedural accuracy and algebraic understanding.
In the final section, the mentor introduced combinations (nCr) to calculate possible committee arrangements under different constraints. Each sub-question was used to strengthen understanding of counting principles and conditional combinations.
By the end of the assessment, the student had:
Looking for a clear example of how to approach this task? You can download the sample solution below to understand the correct structure, formatting, and academic style required. This sample is designed strictly for reference and learning purposes only submitting it as your own work may lead to plagiarism issues or academic penalties.
If you want a 100% original, plagiarism-free, and well-researched assignment, our professional academic writers can prepare a custom solution tailored to your topic and university guidelines. Every order comes with proper citations, clear explanations, and guaranteed confidentiality helping you achieve top grades with confidence.
Plagiarism Disclaimer:
The provided sample is for educational reference only. Do not submit it as your own academic work. Always use it to understand structure, content flow, and analytical approach.
Take the next step towards academic excellence:
Download Sample Solution Order Fresh Assignment
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.