Highlights
Task:
RECAP: FORMATION OF A CONTRACT
Offer and acceptance
Intention to contract
Consideration or price
Capacity to contract
Genuine consent
Legality to contract
#
RECAP: LEGALITY OF OBJECT
Purpose of a contract must not be illegal
Illegal by statute
Illegal or void by common law
#
RECAP: CONTENTS AND
INTERPRETATION OF A CONTRACT
Terms vs representations
Collateral contract
Express terms – Conditions vs warranties
Exclusion clauses
Implied terms
TERMINATION BY PERFORMANCE
Is exact performance always required?
Where performance not as promised, this can be breach of contract
It becomes a question of fact whether:
Entire contract (exact performance required)
Cutter v Powell (1795) 101 ER 573
Divisible contract (express or implied
– performance due after other party has performed in stages). E.g., progress payments in building contracts
TERMINATION BY PERFORMANCE
(CONT.)
Partial performance & Time for performance
Partial performance
Innocent party can accept partial performance = effectively, this is a new contract.
Quantum meruit may be claimed or the innocent party would be “unjustly enriched”:
Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673
Time for performance
If no time is specified in contract, law requires performance within a reasonable time in the circumstances.
Where performance late = damages, unless time is of the essence (in which case contract may be terminated).
Parties may agree to terminate contract in various ways
1. Original contract
This may contain terms for it to be terminated on the occurrence of an event e.g. lease or loan agreement
If contract does not contain a provision as to its duration, the court may imply a right to terminate on giving reasonable notice to the other party: Crawford Fitting Co v Sydney Valve & Fittings Pty Ltd (1988) 14 NSWLR 438.
2. Subsequent agreement
Parties may agree to end contract after it was made or negotiate a substitute agreement to replace it.
Breaches of contract: not always termination
Not every breach entitles termination
Two situations where termination is commonly allowed are:
1. Where other party is
unwilling/unable to perform their obligations (i.e. they repudiate the contract) Laurinda Pty Ltd v Capalaba Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1989) 166 CLR 623
2. Breach of a contractual “condition” or a “serious breach” of a “non-essential term” by the other party
Associated Newspapers Ltd v Bancks(1951) 83 CLR 322 (see [9.160])
L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd [1974] AC 235 (see [9.140])
Koompahtoo Local Aboriginal Land Council v Sanpine Pty Ltd (2007) 233 CLR 115 (see [11.240])
This MLC101 - Law has been solved by our Phd Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.