MLC703-Principles Of Income Tax Law - Law Assignment Help

Assignment Task

PART 1- PROBLEM QUESTIONS

PROBLEM QUESTION 1A

Imp Pty Ltd is an importer of quality electrical goods. It purchased its current premises in Brunswick 20 years ago. It chose the premises location primarily because it would be a convenient location for its workers. Although Imp’s plan was to hold on to the premises long-term, it also chose the location because it considered the possibility that if it did sell the property, the location was likely to benefit from a substantial capital gain. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, working from home has become more common. As a result, Imp wishes to sell the car park, which is a portion of its Brunswick premises. To do so it demolishes the multi-level car park, gets council building approval for a multi townhouse development, and subdivides the total land it owns into two lots (one for what was previously the car park, one for the remaining portion which Imp intended to keep). Using a real estate agent, Imp then sells this portion of the land to a developer for $6 million.

PROBLEM QUESTION 1B

Kayla in 2015 had quit her job and decided she wanted to run a business. Subsequently, on 8 September 2015, Kayla entered into a contract to purchase vacant land for the amount of $600,000. She paid stamp duty and legal fees of $50,000 for the purchase. Settlement occurred on 8 October 2015.

Kayla then on 1 November 2015 entered into another contract to have a retail store built on the vacant land, as well as a small garage (that could store a car) built on the rear of the same land. The contract involved Kayla paying the builder $550,000 to construct these. The construction was completed by 15 January 2016.

After construction was completed, Kayla immediately started running a furniture retail business (as a sole trader) in her recently built retail store. To earn extra income, Kayla rented out the garage in the rear of the land to a car enthusiast for rent of $10,000 a year.

Kayla’s furniture business was successful, and for the time she owned it, the business consistently had annual aggregated turnover of over $4 million.

On 15 February 2022, Kayla entered into a contract to sell her business assets. Although she enjoyed running a business, she felt that the price she was able to sell the business for was too good an opportunity to not take up. Kayla was 52 years of age at the time. Under this contract (entered into with Jake, who planned to continue running the business), she was to be paid the following:

• $1,600,000 for the sale of the land with the shop premises and garage on it.
• $300,000 for the sale of goodwill attached to the store.
• $60,000 for the trading stock in the store
• $100,000 to not compete with Jake for 3 years.

At the time Kayla entered into the contract in February 2022, she owned the following assets:

• Her main residence located in Kew, worth $2.5 million (unmortgaged)

• An investment property located in Burwood worth $1.2 million (with a $500,000 mortgage)

• Shares in BHP, worth $200,000.

• A van that had previously been used by Kayla purely for business purposes (her furniture business) -- but she intends to use it after the sale of her business for personal use only. This was worth $20,000.

• 54% share in a company called SDE Pty Ltd – the company had a market value of $300 000.

• 25% share in a company called UII Pty Ltd – the company had a market value of $200,000.

On 1 March 2022, Kayla bought all the shares in a small company called AUL Pty Ltd for $200,000. The underlying assets of AUL Pty Ltd are a 30% interest in an investment property (this 30% interest is worth $90,000) and a 50% share in the assets of a small accounting firm (worth $110,000).

Advise Kayla as to the Capital Gains Tax implications for this question. Specifically, advise Kayla regarding any CGT payable due to the above events. Ensure that this includes a discussion on whether Kayla can utilise the CGT Small Business Concessions (in Division 152 ITAA97), including the CGT small business rollover concession.

PART 2- POLICY BASED ESSAY QUESTION

Australia’s CGT system in the past utilised indexation to ensure that only after-inflation gains were subject to CGT. Currently, newly acquired assets are generally subject to discounting rather than indexation.

In the context of an emerging higher inflation rate, should consideration be given to replacing the 50% discount with indexation?

Discuss what would be the advantages or disadvantages of such a policy change. Include in your discussions the impact on such a change on

• the simplicity of the tax system;

• economic efficiency;

• equity/fairness. Your answer should briefly include a discussion of the history and operation of CGT indexation and discounting.

This MLC703-Law Assignment has been solved by our Law Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.

You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.