NRS 171 :Health Challenges Acute Care A Assessment Case Study Analysis - Medical Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

1. Describe the type, aetiology, and relevant physiology associated with Mrs Simpsons pain. The description is required to be supported by credible sources of literature.
2. Provide an explanation of the pathophysiology in relation to the mechanisms by which diuretic medication can lead to the development of hypovolemia, hyponatremia, and hypokalaemia. The explanation is required to be supported by credible sources of literature.
3. Identify and describe one (1) preventative nursing care strategy and one (1) collaborative (inter-professional) care strategy that may assist to prevent Mrs Simpson from having another fall at home. The discussion is required to be supported by credible sources of literature
Reference List
Criteria HD DI CR PS FL Mark
Describe the type, aetiology, and relevant physiology associated with Mrs Simpsons pain. The description is required to be supported by credible sources of literature. An outstanding description of the type, aetiology, and relevant physiology associated with Mrs Simpsons pain has been provided
AND the description has been supported by 4 or more credible sources of literature that include a combination of textbooks and peer reviewed journal articles
AND/OR credible health related policy documents or guidelines.
28-30 A thorough description of the type, aetiology, and relevant physiology associated with Mrs Simpsons pain has been provided AND the description has been supported by 3-4 credible sources of literature that include a combination of textbooks and peer reviewed journal articles.
24.5-27.5 An above average description of the type, aetiology, and relevant physiology associated with Mrs Simpsons pain has been provided AND
the description has been supported by 2-3 credible sources of literature that include a combination of textbooks and peer reviewed journal articles.
19.5-24 A satisfactory and accurate description of the type, aetiology, and relevant physiology associated with Mrs Simpsons pain has been provided AND the description has been supported by 1-2 textbook sources of literature only.
15-19 A description of the type of pain has not been provided, AND/ OR an explanation of the aetiology, and relevant physiology of Mrs Simpsons pain has not been provided, AND/ OR an explanation of the type, aetiology, and associated physiology of Mrs Simpsons pain has been provided but the description has NOT been supported by any credible sources of literature.
0-14.5 /30
Provide an explanation of the pathophysiology in relation to the mechanisms by which diuretic medication can lead to the development of hypovolemia, hyponatremia, and hypokalaemia. The explanation is required to be supported by credible sources of literature. An outstanding explanation of the pathophysiology in relation to the mechanisms by which diuretic medication can lead to hypovolemia, hyponatremia, and hypokalaemia has provided AND the explanation has been supported by 4 or more credible sources of literature that include a combination of textbooks and peer reviewed journal articles AND/OR credible health related policy documents or guidelines.
28-30 A thorough explanation of the pathophysiology in relation to the mechanisms by which diuretic medication can lead to hypovolemia, hyponatremia, and hypokalaemia has been provided AND the explanation has been supported by 3-4 credible sources of literature that include a combination of textbooks and peer reviewed journal articles.
24.5-27.5 An above average explanation of the pathophysiology in relation to the mechanisms by which diuretic medication can lead to hypovolemia, hyponatremia, and hypokalaemia has been provided AND the explanation has been supported by 2-3 credible sources of literature that include a combination of textbooks and peer reviewed journal articles.
19.5-24
A satisfactory and accurate explanation of the pathophysiology in relation to the mechanisms by which diuretic medication can lead to hypovolemia, hyponatremia, and hypokalaemia has been provided AND the explanation has been supported by 1-2 textbook sources of literature only.
15-19 An explanation of the pathophysiology in relation to the mechanisms by which diuretic medication can lead to hypovolemia, hyponatremia, and hypokalaemia, has NOT been provided AND/ OR
only one or two mechanisms (i.e., hypovolemia or hyponatremia, or hypokalaemia) have been explained, AND / OR the explanation provided has not been supported by any credible sources of literature.
0-14.5 /30

• Identify and describe one (1) preventative nursing care strategy and one (1) collaborative (inter-professional) care strategy that may assist to prevent Mrs Simpson from having another fall at home.
• The discussion is required to be supported by credible sources of literature. An outstanding identification and description of one (1) preventative nursing care strategy and one (1) collaborative (inter-professional) care strategy has been conducted AND the description has been supported by 4 or more credible sources of literature that include a combination of textbooks and peer reviewed journal articles
• AND/OR credible health related policy documents or guidelines.
• 18-20 A thorough identification and description of one (1) preventative nursing care strategy and one (1) collaborative (inter-professional) care strategy has been conducted AND the description has been supported by 3-4 credible sources of literature that include a combination of textbooks and peer reviewed journal articles.
• 15-17.5  An above average identification and description of one (1) preventative nursing care strategy and one (1) collaborative (inter-professional) care strategy has been conducted AND the description has been supported by 2-3 credible sources of literature that include a combination of textbooks and peer reviewed journal articles.
• 12.5-14.5
• A satisfactory identification and description of one (1) preventative nursing care strategy and one (1) collaborative (inter-professional) care strategy, has been conducted AND the description has been supported by 1-2 textbook sources of literature only.
• 10-12 The identification and description of one (1) preventative nursing care strategy and one (1) collaborative (inter-professional) care strategy has NOT been provided, AND / OR 
• only one (1) care strategy has been identified and described, AND / OR the description has NOT been supported by any credible sources of literature.
• 0-9.5 /20
• Presentation guidelines have been followed, academic writing, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and language features are followed. Presentation guidelines have been followed with academic writing, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and language features largely error free (1-2 errors only).
• 9.5-10 Presentation guidelines have been followed with few errors (between 2-4) evident in academic writing, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and language features. These errors do not impact on the overall clarity of the assignment.
• 8-9 Presentation guidelines have been followed. Minor errors (between 4-5) evident in academic writing, spelling, grammar, punctuation, and language features. These errors do not impact on the overall clarity or interpretation of   the assignment.
• 6.5-7.5 Presentation guidelines have been followed. Moderate errors (of between 8-10) in academic writing, spelling, grammar, punctuation and language features are evident, these may impact the overall clarity of the assignment but do NOT impact on the interpretation of the assignment.
• 5-6 Presentation guidelines have NOT been followed.
• AND/OR poor academic writing consisting of large amounts of errors (>10) with spelling, grammar, and punctuation is evident, affecting the overall clarity and interpretation of the assignment content.
• 0-4.5 /10
• Referencing conforms to the conventions of APA (7th ed.) style. Referencing, conforms to the conventions of APA (7th ed.) style and is largely error free (1-2 errors or omissions only), demonstrating outstanding academic integrity
• 8.5-10
• Referencing conforms to the conventions of APA (7th ed.) style.
• Few errors or omissions (between 2-4) in style and formatting choices are evident, these have no impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.
• 7-8 Referencing is mostly accurate according to the conventions of APA (7th ed.) style.
• Minor errors or omissions (between 4-5) in style and formatting choices are evident, these have no impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.
• 6.5-7 Referencing is mostly accurate according to the conventions of APA (7th ed.) style.
• Moderate errors or omissions (of between 8-10) in style and formatting choices are evident, these have no impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.
• 5-6 Referencing is NOT accurate with APA (7th ed) style.
• AND /OR frequent significant omissions or errors with referencing are evident and impact on the transparency and traceability of the source and the demonstration of academic integrity.
• 0-4.5
• /10
• Academic Integrity
• Assessment will be submitted to Turnitin by the Subject Coordinator.
• Students can submit their assignments to Turnitin before uploading to EASTS.
• Turnitin report indicates a clear attempt has been made to adhere to academic integrity and referencing conventions and avoid plagiarism. It is evident that the student has taken steps to show respect for and acknowledge others’ work appropriately, as per the CSU Academic Integrity Policy.
• SY Turnitin report indicates the student has not adhered to the Academic Integrity Policy.

The above  NRS 171 Medical Science Assignment has been solved by our  Medical Science Assignment  Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.