NUR 222 - Case study for Midwifery students - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Case study for Nursing students 
Victoria is a 67-year-old woman of Polish descent. She moved to Australia approximately 25 years ago  with her family. Her husband died 10 years ago, and she has regular contact with her 4 children who  are now adults raising their families. 
Approximately 3 weeks ago Victoria began to behave in an unusual manner, wandering through her  house at night, refusing to eat and convinced that there were cameras inside the television that were  monitoring her movements. Following a referral from the GP, the community mental health services team assessed her at home and deemed it necessary to admit her for further assessment within an  acute mental health inpatient hospital setting. 
She has been in the ward for approximately 4 days and is receiving care as a voluntary consumer.  During this time she has been isolated, withdrawn and appears frightened of events and interactions  around her. Although she has been generally cooperative with staff, this morning she appears to be  non-compliant with staff requests to take her medication that consists of a small dose of an  antipsychotic and her regular antihypertensive medication. When staff gently request that she take her  tablets she begins to lash out, thrashing and physically hitting the nurses; yelling that they are trying to  hurt her and take her money. 
Due to the risk of Victoria’s behaviour on her physical safety and the safety of others, it is decided that  her legal status should be reviewed under the Mental Health Act and that she should receive  intramuscular sedation. 
Before Victoria is reviewed, a phone order of medication is given to administer a sedative. The team  leader directs that the sedation be given without Victoria’s consent due to the possible risk of her  hurting herself and others. This directive is completed. During this time the process is noisy and  disruptive to the ward and one nurse sustains a laceration to her arm while trying to restrain Victoria.  Other patients are visibly upset by this action and one mentions that it is barbaric and they are going to  report the nursing staff to the NMBA. 
Task 
Your focus should be on the ethical and legal requirements discussed throughout this course.  Pay attention to workplace health and safety, legal and ethical requirements, law  surrounding decision making and consent. Using the legal and ethical decision-making  framework identify and justify the care that will be provided to Victoria. What are your legal 
and ethical responsibilities and what professional standards and codes need to be  considered?
Case study for Midwifery students 
Lisa Jones is a 17-year-old primigravida living in Western Queensland. She is an only child  and is 37 weeks pregnant. She lives at home with her mother, Ruth, and her stepfather, John. Lisa and her boyfriend, Sam (18), are still in a relationship but they do not live  together. Sam is still at school and Lisa has been studying during her pregnancy. Lisa has  been receiving antenatal care through the local country hospital. 
Presenting case 
24 hours ago, Lisa complained of feeling unwell and having a headache. She stayed at home  and took some Paracetamol. This morning Ruth brought Lisa a cup of tea and found her  restless and confused. She did not appear to understand what Ruth was saying and was  becoming agitated. Ruth called an ambulance and Lisa was brought into the emergency  department (ED) at the local hospital then transferred to the maternity unit for obstetric  assessment. Sam was called to come into the hospital by Ruth. Initial clinical observations  indicate that Lisa may have developed severe pre-eclampsia. Her blood pressure is 170/105,  she is agitated and has epigastric pain. Bloods have been sent for analysis. Lisa is stating that  she wants to go home and does not want to be in hospital and is becoming aggressive  towards the maternity staff. Sam asks why the midwives cannot provide care at home and  her mother wants her to stay in hospital. 
Task 
Your focus should be on the ethical and legal requirements discussed throughout this  course. Pay attention to workplace health and safety, legal and ethical requirements, law  surrounding decision making and consent. Using the legal and ethical decision-making  framework identify and justify the care that will be provided to Lisa. What are your legal and  ethical responsibilities and what professional standards and codes need to be considered?
Case study for Medical Science students 
Claire is a 28 year old who has lived on the Sunshine Coast in Caloundra for the last 3 years. She is a  nurse with emergency and critical care experience. She has spent a number of years working around  the world doing short term deployments for Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) which she has planned to  continue doing from her home base in Caloundra. 
She is in an on again/off again relationship of 3 years with Phillip, an Irish national who she met while  on deployment with MSF. He is a logistician with MSF and lives in Geneva when not on deployment or  visiting Claire. Claire and Phillip have discussed living arrangements and while not seeing other people  they have not formalised their relationship nor settled on permanent living arrangements.  Claire is unexpectantly pregnant and organised with Phillip to travel to Australia for her first obstetric  appointment.  
Just before leaving the doctor’s office, Claire had sent a jubilant text message to her parents. “Guess  what?! We’re pregnant!!! “. The first she had mentioned of this to them. 
Presenting Case: 
Claire and Phillip were driving home from this appointment when tragedy struck. Another driver,  distracted by an incoming text message, ran a red light and crashed into their car. Both sustained  severe injuries. Unfortunately, Phillip is deceased at the scene. Claire survives, having escaped injury  except for a massive head injury. Her treating team now say that, 3 weeks after the accident, the  prognosis is grim. The outlook is continuation for some time in a persistent vegetative state (PVS). 
Claire was pregnant, and unlike most young adults, had thought about her mortality. She had gone to  continuing education workshops about end of life care and advance care planning in the course of her  career. She had completed her own advance directives some months ago, before becoming pregnant,  as she was deploying into often insecure environments naming Phillip as her power of attorney for  
healthcare decisions, given she was planning on formalising their relationship in the near future. In her  directives she has included a clear, handwritten statement about life prolongation if she were,  somehow, “to end up in anything like PVS, from which I am not apt to recover.” In such a condition she  had written, “I do NOT want my life to be extended by means of medically assisted nutrition and  hydration, ventilator, or other life support.” These documents were witnessed by her legal  representative. 
With Phillip now deceased, treatment decisions are left up to Claire’s parents. They both are  thoughtful people, both healthcare professionals, who take very seriously their difficult responsibility  of acting on Claire’s behalf. After consulting her treating team, other family members, and even their  priest, a decision is made to stop everything except palliative care. They had received a copy of their  daughter’s advance health directives and have determined that this is what she would have wanted,  what in fact she had conveyed with such prescience. Plans are made to transfer Claire to a palliative unit in another part of the hospital. It would take place the following day. 
That evening, Phillip’s parents arrive from overseas. They had come to transport his body back to  Ireland for burial, a process that had been held up by police and coronial investigations. They had not  previously met Claire’s parents and had learned of her pregnancy through friends of Phillip’s only  recently. They are devout Catholics and regard life as sacrosanct. They are staunch anti-abortion  activists in their home country. They have attended the hospital and demanded that the treating team  continue to treat Claire as they wish their grandchild to be born which is now possible due to advances  in medical care. At times they have become quite aggressive and the hospital has advised that they  may be barred from attending the facility. The treating consultant calls Claire’s parents and says  hesitatingly, “We have a bit of a problem here. It appears we may need some legal assistance, perhaps  an ethics consultation, and must postpone Claire’s transfer of care.” The doctor explains further what  Phillip’s parents are demanding and that the postponement may be for weeks while the issues are sorted out. 
Claire’s parents had spent a sleepless night anticipating the transfer. It would be the hardest thing  they’ve ever done, and yet the right thing in keeping with their daughter’s wishes. Now they can’t  believe what they’re hearing. Postpone? Ineffective advance health directives? Continued life support?  Did the doctor really say that? That there may even need to be surgery for a feeding tube and a  tracheostomy while this legal/ethical glitch is being discussed and gets clarified? 
Almost in unison, Claire’s mother and father protest, “But our daughter didn’t want this!” 
Task: 
Your focus should be on the ethical and legal requirements discussed throughout this course. Pay  attention to workplace health and safety, legal and ethical requirements, issues surrounding decision  making and consent. Using the legal and ethical decision-making framework identify and justify the  care that has been provided to Claire. What are your legal and ethical responsibilities and what  professional standards and codes need to be considered?

This NUR 222 Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.