NUR2102: Mrs. Mabel Sweeney Case Study - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Brief task description

Apply
Strategic Priority Area 1.1 (Promote health and reduce risk),
Strategic Priority Area 2.1 (Active Engagement) and
Objective 3 – Target priority populations of the National Strategic Framework
for Chronic Conditions and identify and describe how you would assess, intervene and evaluate care for the case study Mrs Mabel Sweeney. 

Rationale for assessment task.

This assessment will develop clinical reasoning skills and demonstrate the application of models of evidence-based care to work collaboratively with individuals with chronic conditions. It will develop theoretical concepts to assess, plan and intervene and evaluate care for people with a chronic conditions. The assessment will develop graduates who are; well informed individuals with discipline-specific and industry knowledge relevant to their profession or area of study; critical, creative, thinkers who can integrate and apply knowledge and relevant skills, including research and digital literacy skills, to analyse and evaluate ideas, concepts, theories and problems, and offer insights, innovative approaches and solutions; ethical, engaged professionals and citizens who engage in non-discriminatory and sage practices and consider the local, global, social, economic legal and environmental influences on, and impact of, their attitudes and actions; and employable, enterprising professionals who are confident, self-directed, know how they learn, and are resourceful, resilient, and adaptable to change.

Course Objectives measured

CLO 1. Apply clinical reasoning skills and models of evidence-based care to work collaboratively with individuals with chronic conditions across the lifespan; CLO 2. Apply theoretical concepts in simulated practice to assess, plan and therapeutically intervene and evaluate care for people with various chronic conditions;

GA 1. Well informed individuals with discipline-specific and industry knowledge relevant to their profession or area of study;

GA 2. Critical, creative, thinkers who can integrate and apply knowledge and relevant skills, including research and digital literacy skills, to analyse and evaluate ideas, concepts, theories and problems, and offer insights, innovative approaches and solutions;

GA 3. Ethical, engaged professionals and citizens who engage in non-discriminatory and sage practices and consider the local, global, social, economic legal and environmental influences on, and impact of, their attitudes and actions;

GA 4. Employable, enterprising professionals who are confident, self-directed, know how they learn, and are resourceful, resilient, and adaptable to change.

Task detail

Step 1: Read the case study of Mrs Mable Sweeney as provided on page seven of this task sheet.

Step 2: Read the National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions via the link provided in the Resources available to complete the task section below.

Focus your reading on Strategic Priority Area 1.1 (Promote health and reduce risk), Strategic Priority Area 2.1 (Active Engagement) and Objective 3 - Target priority populations of the National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions.

Step 3: Using the information provided in the case study and supported by the best available evidence apply the National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions Strategic Priority Areas (1.1, 2.1 and Objective 3 – Target priority populations) in essay format responding to the following criteria:

Assignment criteria

Criteria One.

Identify the risk factors for Mrs Mabel Sweeney and clearly explain why these are risk factor for her. The discussion should be linked to the National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions Strategic Priority Area 1.1 (Promote health and reduce risk).

Criteria Two

Using the best available evidence identify the nursing assessments that are required to be conducted for Mrs Mabel Sweeney and the rationale for these.

Criteria Three.

Using the best available evidence and demonstrating links to the National Strategic Framework for Chronic Conditions Objective 3 - Target priority populations, discuss why rs Mabel Sweeney might be identified as being a priority population and the impact this may have on her chronic condition self-management.

Criteria Four

Using the best available evidence, discuss the self-management priorities that would be developed in collaboration with Mrs Mabel Sweeney. These should consider health promotion and reducing the risk of complications (Strategic Priority Area 1.1) and show links to the risk factors identified in Criteria One.

Criteria Five.

With support from the best available evidence, explain how goal setting may impact on actively engaging patients in their care (Strategic Priority Area 2.1).

Writing Style

1. This assessment piece will be written in the form of an academic essay providing links to relevant peer reviewed articles.

2. An introduction and conclusion are required

3. Write in full grammatical sentences

4. Use correct spelling and punctuation

5. Paragraph format is required. Dot/bullet points or numbered lists are not permitted

6. Keep your writing formal and in third person.

7. Express your ideas clearly and concisely

8. Appropriately reference any information sources used.

Referencing/ citations

For this assessment you will use either APA 6th or APA 7th referencing style.

Sources: the majority of the references contained within your reference list must be no older than 6 years old.

In text citations: You must include in text citations in the body of your work. Each new point or piece of evidence must be attributed (via in-text citation) to the source.

Formatting Style

Assessments must be presented as follows;
1. Microsoft word document format
2. Double Line Spacing with page numbers to be provided
3. Times New Roman, 12-point font
4. Use APA formatting style. The first line of each paragraph is indented. The reference list starts on a new page with the heading “References”

Resources available to complete task

1. NUR2102 course modules, specifically 1, 2 & 3

2. National Strategic Framework for chronic conditions

3. SMART Goals information (see information in Appendix A)USQ academic writing style is provided in links on the course Resources Tab. https://www.usq.edu.au/library/study-support/assignments

5. Referencing https://www.usq.edu.au/library/referencing

What you need to submit

One Microsoft Word document that contains the following items:
Coversheet including unit code, unit name, semester and year, assignment title, student name, student number, word count
Please use the Written Assignment Criteria Marking Guide to guide you, but do not submit the Written Assignment Criteria Marking Guide with your assessment. 

Submission requirements

This assessment is to be submitted electronically via the Written Assignment Submission link on the NUR2102 Study Desk. It must be submitted in electronic format as a Microsoft document via Turnitin. The Turnitin process may take up to 24 hours to produce a report. Therefore, allow adequate time to do this and address any issues of plagiarism detected by Turnitin before final submission.

File Name Conventions

Save your document with the following naming conventions: surname_initial_studentnumber_coursecode_A2.doc

Moderation

• This task will be moderated against the Written Assignment Criteria Marking Guide available on the Study Desk;
• All staff who are assessing your work meet to discuss and compare their marking before marks or grades are finalised. A rigorous moderation process is undertaken for this course; hence no remarking of assessment pieces will be considered.
• Final release of grades will normally be within three weeks of submission. This timeframe applies for any approvals for an extension of time commencing at the time of submission.

Academic Integrity Statement

Please review the USQ policy for Academic Integrity (https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/13752PL). Turnitin has been enabled so that students can check for similarity matching within their assessment and make amendments prior to the due date to demonstrate academic integrity.

Late Submissions

The penalty for late submission without a pre-approved extension is a reduction by 5% of the maximum Mark applicable for the Assignment, for each University Business Day or part Business Day that the Assignment is late (https://policy.usq.edu.au/documents/14749PL).

Mrs Mabel Sweeney

Case Study; Mrs Mabel Sweeney

Mrs Mabel Sweeney is a retired 68 widower with a 6-year history of Heart Failure. Her past medical history includes episodes of tachycardia, arrhythmias, oedema, fatigue and dyspnoea. At the time of diagnosis, she was advised to lose weight (at least 5kg) and to attend a Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit but no further action was taken. Mabel lives in a rural area that is 150 kms from the nearest tertiary hospital and medical centre. Mabel presented to her nearest General Practitioner (GP) with recent weight gain, decreased exercise tolerance, swelling of the feet, fatigue, dyspnoea and generalised weakness. Mable has been wanting to lose weight and increase her exercise tolerance over the past 12 months, but states that she lacks motivation

Mabel is prescribed an ACE inhibitor and diuretic once a day. She tolerates these medications but admits that she does not take them due to the side effects. Mabel complains that the medications make her cough and pass urine frequently. She does not self-monitor her blood pressure at home or restrict her fluid or salt intake. She expresses doubt that this would improve the management of her Heart Failure as her GP already knows that her blood pressure is high and that she has swelling in her legs. In the past her neighbour has encouraged Mabel to treat her Heart Failure with herbal remedies and weight loss supplements.

Mabel’s husband died 8 years ago and she has been receiving a war widow’s pension since that time. Mabel relies on her nearest neighbour to travel to the 150 kms to closest metropolitan centre for food, health care services and other essentials. Mabel used to be very active as a volunteer in the small community she resides in however, she now finds that she is too tired to keep this up. Mabel states that she now has “nothing to do” and feels “isolated and lonely”. Mable has no children or living relatives. Although she is aware that her mother had Heart Failure, Mabel has limited knowledge regarding the management of this condition and cannot understand why she has Heart Failure as she has never had a “heart attack”.

During the last year Mable has gained 6kg and has become less physically active. She has never seen a dietician and has not been instructed in self-monitoring of blood pressure or the restriction of fluids. Her diet consists mostly of snacks and packaged meals that are high in salt and saturated fat. Since her husband’s death, Mabel has been consuming more alcohol (approximately 14 standard drinks per week) however, she has never smoked.

As Mabel is unable to regularly travel the distance to her closest medical centre or tertiary hospital, she only has occasional medical check-ups however, her medical records indicate that she has had no surgeries and only one hospitalisation for an acute exacerbation of Heart Failure three years ago.

This Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.