NUR272 - Palliative - Rehabilitation and Continuing Cares - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Information Sheet – Task 3 Literature Review (report) 
Definition: A literature review (report) is an objective, critical summary of published peer reviewed literature relevant to a topic (sourced from USC University). 
Description 
As a professional body, dissemination of findings occurs through the facilitation and mutual shaping of knowledge and shared experiences. Use of best evidence enhances this development and creates formal guidelines within practice settings. 
Therefore Task 3 is to review and report on current literature relevant to health professional attributes and quality of their services from the core values expected by industry listed on page 7 in the National Palliative Care Standards. 
Each of these core values can have a lasting impact on a person and their family when receiving care during their end of life phase. 
The Literature Review (report) is to the select topic and question below - one (1) only; 
a. The influence of advocate and its importance as a standard of care by nurse’s in 
the provision of quality Palliative care when supporting the person and their family during end of life care. 
b. The influence of dignity and its importance as a standard of care by nurse’s in the provision of quality Palliative care when supporting the person and their family during end of life care. 
Aim of this assessment: 
• investigates a nurse’s professional attributes and influence these may have on those in care during the end of life illness experience 
• explore and search the library database to the focus topic outlined above 
• consider how these attributes can impact on recipients of care with discussion on what would be the effects on care outcomes relevant to end of life care experience 

LITERATURE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS 
1. This knowledge shapes your future as a professional nurse and knowledge of Palliative care attributes and expectation by industry. Select one (1) core value provided under the Description section located above of this information sheet. 
2. Uncertain of what are the Eight (8) Core Values? Then review Learning materials Module 4 (Introducing Core Values) to find out more. Core values are on page 7 of the National Palliative Care Standards. 
3. Search current published journal using the USC library database. This is very important as the use of current peer journal articles is the ONLY source for Task 3. 
NOTE: Usage of secondary resources such as textbooks will NOT support this assessment requirement. 
4. You will need to do an Advanced search in the Library database. Choice of key words and phrases are very important when doing this process. For example; advocate or dignity, health care attributes, standard of care by nurses, end of life, quality care, dying bereavement. 
NOTE: If you are uncertain on what is an Advanced search, contact the librarian for help. Otherwise you can contain Academic student support services. Do this early as the selection of journal articles for your reporting response will be reliant of the type of selection choice you make. 
5. Word limit - 1000 ± 10% including intext citations. This count is not to include the reference list. Review the template for word count in each section. You are required not to deviate from this. 
6. Follow the template provided. The template will guide you populating each section 
and supports the structured layout. It is important that you proofread prior to FINAL SUBMISSION. 
7. Selected Journals. You must have at least 7 journal references from recognised 
peer review journals within a 5-year timeline from the publication period. No textbooks are to be used in this assessment item. No more than 10 journals maximum. 
Marks received will consider: - the selection of articles based on quality, currency of articles, relevance to topic. For example, use of a total of 8 excellent quality articles all of which strengthens review and the reporting as opposed to 10 basic articles with little alignment to the searched topic. The search and reporting of the literature to the topic is very important. 
The National Palliative Care Standards 5th edition care be reference and used as citation in the introduction of this report. This is where the core value originated and therefore must be identified. 
8. Referencing. For this item other sources such as textbooks do not support the 
marking response. You will jeopardise marks if textbooks are used as this is not the assessment brief. The referencing style by USC School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine is the Harvard style. You are directed USC Academic Skills on Referencing, for the Harvard style. You can also check with referencing resources provided by the USC library. 
SUBMISSION: 
Use of Draft Submission area is for safe assignment check. You MUST allow 48 hours prior to final submission to effectively use safe assignment Draft Submission area. 
Ensure you upload your final product into the FINAL SUBMISSION area. It will not be marked if an electronic copy is not submitted via the correct site. 
Late penalties will be commenced as per the USC policy for each day that Task 3 is submitted late. 
Results Marking staff have a two-week turn-around on the marking for Task 3 as (per USC policy). There is a 5-day period for students on review of the mark. Please review the policy on this process prior to requesting for consideration a review of mark. 
An e-copy of the policy is in the assessment folder. Announcements will be made periodically to give tracking of marking progress. Results can be viewed via the link in My Interim Results. 
Feedback is not subjective but is provided openly to a student as a process of learning. The information feedback should be viewed by you to assist with improvement for future work. It is a critique of the final product you have formally submitted for review and 
marking. The feedback given is by clinician’s who have a higher education and academics. Any feedback on assignments is aimed at supporting your learning, and should be treated as such, and not perceived as personal. 
PLAGIARISM AND COLLUSION: 
The Literature Review must be your own work. Evidence of plagiarism may result in a Fail grade. Your work will be checked for potential copying from reference sources and assignments submitted by other students, including those submitted in previous years. Collusion with other students (i.e. identical work submitted by two or more students) may also result in a Fail grade. Plagiarism and collusion are considered serious in nature at University. ‘Safe Assignment’ will be used to check your Task 3 submission. 
FORMATTING GUIDELINES: 
• Font: Times New Roman, Arial or Helvetica; 12 point for text; follow the format for headings and subheadings in USC academic writing skill. 
• Line spacing: Word doc.1.5 line spacing to allow for marking. 
• Margins: can be reduced to 1.5 cm on left and right margins on each page. A minimum of 1.5 cm for top and bottom margins. 
• Indent new paragraphs. 
• No cover page is necessary. 
• Spell check your final product prior to submission! Dictionary: The Macquarie English Dictionary is the reference that is used at USC with regards to spelling. Standard English (as opposed to American English) grammar and punctuation are the norm and there are various thesaurus and guides in the library for use by students as a reference. 
• Professional language is required reflective of the discipline of nursing. Correct terminology reflective of professional practice standards. 
• No dot points in this item as they are not acceptable writing style for this response. 
• Only minimal use of abbreviations. 
Frequently Asked Questions - Task 3 - Literature Review (or component) 
Are we able to use the 'Standards for Providing Quality Palliative Care' for all Australians document as a reference to critique? 
The requirement of this assessment item is to critique other authors viewpoints surrounding the same concept. It would be impossible to critique an analysis on grey literature, standards or guidelines specific to what this Assessment Task 3 question is asking. Looking closer at the rubric it mentions published quality peer journal articles. 
Do I need to have everything included on the one page for the review – my references don’t fit? 
No, your reference list can be on a separate page. This page is to follow the USC conventions with header and footer. The header is with your name and the Task 3 item. Page number in the footer. All other elements must be included on the review using a size 12 font. The referencing list section is to have a size 12 font. 
What do you mean by a Table? 
The Table section of the report can be viewed as a summary presentation. The Table can provide a clear visual correlation of the synthesis - the summary of themes / concepts in the report section. There is a correlation or connect between the Table which demonstrates the authors similarities on the key points 
without taking up too much space and when designed properly can support the Themes / Groups from within the body (report) section. The Table can easily highlight the similarities and differences on each of the authors. 
What is the template to this presentation? 
The template helps you in planning the content layout. The template gives a basic structure on the overall design and presentation and can also help as a guide to build on and develop into a final product for submission. It highlights the importance of the information by the way the information is structured. A good layout supports the report to the discussion and vice versa - overall 'flow of the read' from beginning to end. 
 

This NUR272 Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.