PHI3PCM: Philosophical Controversies and Methods - Report Writing Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

For this Assignment:

1. Choose one article or book chapter from the Library List Secondary Readings; and

2. Write a review of the author’s argument (1000 words, + or – 10%).

Your review should contain the following:

1. A brief introduction stating 

   1. the author’s name, article/book chapter title, the topic that it addresses; and

   2. how your review proceeds, that is, outline what you will do in this review (for example, “after outlining the author’s aims, this review assesses the arguments and evidence for the view that ….” 

2. The purpose of the main part of your review (roughly 3 paragraphs) is to explain to your reader what the argument of the article/chapter is, and to assess how well it is supported. Note the following:

   1. In outlining the author’s aims, central argument and main premises (evidence):

      1.  Don’t assume your reader has read the article/chapter, ie. give enough of a picture of what the point of the article is, what concepts are drawn upon and how the argument is advanced, to help your reader understand your assessment that will follow; and

      2. Use Harvard in-text referencing (For example, Nicolacopoulos 2020, p. 21).

   2. Explain what evidence the author relies on (for example, if the article is offering an interpretation of a particular concept, the evidence may be primary textual support for the claims being made.)

   3. Explain what you see as the strengths of this argument. Do you find it helpful in some way? Are the claims advanced convincing? Did it change your mind in some way? Was the perspective/position from which the argument is advanced clear and explicit?

   4. Identify any weaknesses or limitations. For example, are you aware of counter-evidence for a claim made in the article? Was the authorial perspective problematic in some way (for example, suggestive of bias, unacknowledged privilege)? Is the scope too narrow, that is, it puts the case for its position well, but the topic/issue addressed seems to be missing something really important (eg the article makes general claims about gender while ignoring gender diversity)? Are there inconsistencies in the claims advanced? You may comment on how the argument of the article might have been made more strongly. 

   5. You are not expected to address everything mentioned in c and d, they are only examples of what you might choose to focus on. One or two well-presented points regarding strengths and weaknesses of the article are preferable to a list of claims.

   6. You are not required to show evidence of further research for this assignment, but you may refer to other sources, for example, to make a point of comparison that helps to show a particular strength or weakness of the article/chapter.

3. A conclusion summarising your main findings/assessment of the argument of the article/chapter. 

This PHI3PCM: Report Writing Assignment has been solved by our Report Writing Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.