PHIX1032 - Happiness Goodness And Justice - Arts and Humanities Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Penalties: 
• If your essay exceeds the word count, it will be penalized. 
• If you breach the University’s policy on academic integrity, you may be reported to the  Faculty’s Disciplinary Committee. 
• Unless a Special Consideration request has been submitted and approved, (a) a penalty for  lateness will apply – two (2) marks out of 100 will be deducted per day for assignments  submitted after the due date – and (b) no assignment will be accepted more than seven (7)  days (incl. weekends) after the original submission deadline.  
Extension requests: All extension requests should be submitted as requests for Special  Consideration via ask.mq.edu.au, prior to the submission deadline. You will need to show that you  have legitimate grounds for seeking an extension (see the Special Considerations policy link in the  Unit Guide), and may be required to provide supporting documentation.  
Questions and Queries: please post your questions or queries in the Assessments Forum on iLearn.  One of the teaching team will respond as soon as they can.  
General Instructions: 
1. DO NOT WRITE YOUR NAME on your assessment, as either your file name or on your essay.  Only include your student number as an identifier. This is because the essays will be  anonymously marked. 
2. Please use your student number and question number as the file name (e.g. 48654123_Q4). 3. Do not include a cover page. Simply put your student number at the top of the first page, put  your title, and proceed with your essay.  
4. All assignments must be submitted online via Turnitin. You can only submit once.  5. Research: in addition to relevant texts from the course readings, in your essay you should use  and refer to roughly 2 to 3 further pieces of research.  
6. Referencing: You can use any Arts/Humanities style, such as the Harvard, Chicago, or APA  styles, and you should be consistent. Your in-text citations should include page numbers.  Please do not use a numerical referencing style (such as the Vancouver style) that is used in the  Sciences.  
7. Include a word count at the end. A qualitative marking rubric is included below. Your essay will  be graded against this rubric. 
8. Please use size 12 font with 1.5 or double line spacing.  
9. Finally, make sure you remain available via email after submission, in case there are technical difficulties with your submission. If we cannot access your submission, we will be unable to  give you a grade.  
Writing Instructions:  
The aim of this assignment is to critically reflect on what you have learned in parts 2 and 3 of the  unit on the nature of morality and justice. Follow the 4 steps below in planning and composing your essay. 
1. You need to write a short introduction in which you identify the issue at hand and you briefly  summarise in a sentence or two what you will be arguing. You should tell your reader what your  position will be and give an outline of how you will argue for your position.  
2. The body of your essay should provide a discussion of what you take to be the most important  reasons that can be given in favour of the claim you are arguing for, as well as a consideration of  some of the main objections that can be made to your claim. Your discussion should make explicit  reference to the theory that the claim relates to and to the relevant readings from the course.  
3. You should also undertake and integrate into your essay some further relevant research. You  should use this research to help you to: understand the relevant issues and claims, highlight  relevant points in previous discussions of these issues, develop arguments in favour of your view,  develop objections to your view, or develop responses to objections to your view. You should use  appropriate academic peer-reviewed sources.  
As a guide, in addition to relevant texts from the course readings, in your essay you should use and  refer to roughly 2 to 3 further pieces of research. You can use more sources if you wish. To get  started, have a look at the supplementary readings on Leganto and at the extra readings list. We  have also provided a lecture in Echo by librarian Alana Hadfield, who shows you how to conduct  your own research. 
4. You need to write a brief conclusion in which you recapitulate what you have discussed in the  essay, and most importantly, what conclusion you came to. You need to reiterate strongly, in  simple words, whether you agree with the claim or not.  
• There is a video on Echo that goes through the basics for writing a philosophy essay.  • In the Assessments section on iLearn, there are multiple writing and referencing guides. 
Task:  
In a 1500-word essay, respond to ONE of the following:  
1. The foundation/authority of morality: Consider one religious account of morality (i.e. Divine  Command Theory) and one secular (non-religious) account of morality (i.e. Moral Cultural  Relativism, Social Contract Theory, Utilitarianism, or Kantian ethics). According to each  account, what is the basis for determining right and wrong? Which provides the most  compelling account and why?  
2. Judging other cultures: Can a moral relativist critically judge the moral practices of people in  other cultures, or should she be committed to a principle of uncritical tolerance? Discuss with  reference to at least one specific case or example.  
3. Moral worth of an action: Is the moral worth of an action determined by the consequences of  the action (as the Utilitarians argue), or by the intention that motivates the action (as Kantians  argue)? Discuss with reference to examples and defend your answer with reasons. 
4. The role of duty: Why did Kant argue that only acts performed out of duty are acts that have  moral worth? Explain Kant’s view of the role of duty in morality, using one or two examples to  illustrate his view. Do you agree with Kant that the motives we act on ought to be based on a  sense of duty, as opposed to affection, passion or other sentiments? Why/why not? Explain  and give reasons to defend your answer. 
5. Distributive justice: Rawls argues for an account of justice as fairness and gives us two  principles of justice. According to Rawls, what approach should we take to determining which  distributions of resources and opportunities would be fair for the worst off within our society?  Do you agree with Rawls? Evaluate his approach and give reasons to support your evaluation.  
6. Social justice: Consider one of the following examples of alleged injustice: global inequality or  closed national borders. Critically discuss your chosen example by applying Rawls’ theory of  justice and showing the implications of his analysis for your chosen problem. 
7. Responsibility and justice: Consider the following statement from the 1991 Beijing Ministerial  Declaration on Environment and Development:  

This PHIX1032: Arts and Humanities Assignment Help has been solved by our Arts and Humanity Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.