Policy Analysis and Critique Critical Analysis of the Policy Document - Law Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Drawing on your Assessment items 1 and 2, and the feedback you received from Assessment item 2, you will write a 1350 word critical analysis of the policy document you have chosen. This involves conducting research into the relevant issues you identified in Assessment item 2 and applying Intersectional Theory to your analysis of the issues raised and how these issues are addressed (or not) by the policy. You should present a critical analysis of the efficacy of this policy document in addressing the identified issues and suggest potential areas of improvement. 
 

RATIONALE
SUBJECT LEARNING OUTCOMES
This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:

• be able to explain key theories relating to gender and sexuality in the criminal justice context.
• be able to apply key theories of feminism, postmodernity, critical criminology, intersectionality, power and queer theory to policy and practice in a criminal justice context.
• be able to describe the gendered application of the law and criminal justice.
• be able to apply an interdisciplinary approach to their understanding of gender sexuality, and crime.
• GRADUATE LEARNING OUTCOMES
• This task also contributes to the assessment of the following Charles Sturt Graduate Learning Outcome/s:
• Global Citizenship (Knowledge) - Charles Sturt Graduates understand the impact of culture and global issues on professional practice.
   

MARKING CRITERIA AND STANDARDS
Criteria HD DI CR PS Marks Awarded

• Analysis and Critique of the chosen policy
• 10 marks Sophisticated critical appraisal evaluation and analysis of policy using synthesised literature, drawing conclusions for practice.
• Advanced use of theory where appropriate and discussion is well supported by evidence where required. Excellent critical appraisal of literature analysis of policy drawing on a synthesis of relevant academic literature.
•  Excellent use of theory where appropriate and the discussion is well supported by evidence where required Policy is critically appraised using literature identifying key points, strengths and weaknesses of different perspectives.
• Good use of theory where appropriate and the discussion is supported by evidence where required. Some attempt to critically appraise policy, strengths and weaknesses of the policy are discussed with use of academic literature on Intersectionality theory, however, the discussion is mostly descriptive.
• Discussion lacks theory. The discussion is mostly supported by evidence where required. /10
• Structure and Argument

7.5 marks A high quality, well planned piece. Presented discussion clearly and succinctly, in a concise, structured and focused manner. A high quality, well planned piece. Presented discussion clearly and succinctly, in a concise, structured manner, but with a minor lack of focus Assessment shows evidence of planning. Presented discussion in a mostly clear, concise, structured manner, but with a moderate lack of focus Assessment seems to lack planning but contains some structure and addresses some of the issues. However, there is a significant lack of focus. /7.5
Research Skills
7.5 marks Uses numerous relevant, appropriate academic sources to provide a range of perspectives (at least 15 sources). Uses many relevant, appropriate academic sources to provide a range of perspectives (at least 12 sources). Uses some relevant, appropriate academic sources to provide a range of perspectives (at least 10 sources). Further research needed. Uses some relevant, appropriate academic sources to provide a range of perspectives (at least 6 sources). Much more research needed. /7.5

PRESENTATION
Assessment tasks should be submitted on EASTS as a Microsoft Word document. Do not submit as a PDF document.
The first page should contain your name, student number, subject code, word count and due date. Please use 12 point font and avoid the use of fancy templates with added colour or graphics.
Lines should be double spaced.
The assessment tasks should be within +/- 10% of the word limit. The word count is taken from the first word to the last word and includes quotes. Quotes must comprise less than 10% of the total word count.
Proof-read your work so that it is free of spelling, grammar and punctuation mistakes. Use language that is appropriate to academic and professional tasks. Ensure you use respectful and appropriate terminology. For assistance, see Learning Skills: http://www.csu.edu.au/division/studserv/learning

The above Law Assignment has been solved by our  Law Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.