Highlights
Technical Report (2500 words)
Topic: 3.Mental health
You may choose to focus on a particular region within the area named in the topic, a particular subpopulation within the population named, and a particular health/wellbeing issue (or issues) within the broader health issue named. For example, in responding to topic you could focus on a particular group of University students and a particular set of issues in Mental health
As you may not yet have enough information on a particular context to understand how it has been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, you are allowed to write this report as if the pandemic has not taken place (ie design for pre-pandemic conditions). Please state on the title page of your report whether you are writing for a COVID-19 mid-pandemic context or not.
For your selected context and health and wellbeing issue, you are asked to design an intervention. Prepare a program design document that contains the following:
An introduction to the context, health and wellbeing issue, and determinants (you should not present a stakeholder analysis matrix or problem tree in this report, although you may wish to use them in planning your thinking).
Describe the intervention(s) you are proposing and the reasons you are proposing those intervention(s). This should include the evidence for the effectiveness of your interventions for your target group, existing services that are in place, and other feasibility issues that are relevant to the context. It is not necessary to provide prioritisation matrices, even if you have used them, though it is expected that you justify the criteria/values that you used to select your intervention.
Present and discuss a logic model to describe how your interventions may be expected to address the health and wellbeing issue.
Within the three year timeframe for the program, you will need to conduct two evaluations:
A formative evaluation in year 2 to guide the program manager in improving the program’s effectiveness
An outcome evaluation at the end of year 3 to understand the program’s outcomes
For EACH of these two evaluations, provide two sample evaluation questions which you think would be important to ask, and justify your choice and wording of questions.
Describe your advocacy strategy for gaining support for this intervention within ONE stakeholder group.
Organisational context
You are the program design team leader for an organisation (please choose between a non- government or government organisation and make this clear in your report) with expertise in the context and issues described in your chosen scenario. It is assumed that a needs assessment has already been undertaken in this context, and that you have been asked to lead/facilitate the process of designing an appropriate intervention. If your program is approved, you will have access to up to AUD$1.5 million in funding over the next three years – you are not expected to budget; as with the group assignment this amount is only to give you an idea of the scale of the possible program. You may also make reasonable assumptions about being able to engage with local resources (government, NGO, community) and collaborate with local organisations. There is a possibility the funding may be continued after three years, but this is not certain. The design document you are preparing is for presentation to program experts in your health problem and context, who will decide whether your intervention should be funded.
Writing a program design document
This is not an academic essay but a report. A program design document is a common form of health communication that is primarily used as a technical document to brief stakeholders, and advocate for support and guide implementation. The language used is professional but may be less formal than academic writing and the report should be structured with headings and subheadings to guide the reader.
Referencing
Referencing should use the APA or Vancouver systems.
As with all academic writing, any idea or work that is your own creation for this assignment does not need referencing, but other people’s work (or your own work for other subjects/projects) does need to be referenced if used. However you must avoid selecting a topic that you have covered in a previous assignment in this or other subjects and drawing upon this past material for this assessment task.
General concepts like logic models, problem trees, stakeholder analysis frameworks etc. do not need to be referenced.
Wherever possible, please refer to real-life sources on the context in which your program is set, but you are also allowed to make reasonable assumptions about the context where data are not available or specific to your region. Because you cannot carry out a real needs assessment we are allowing you to assume (make up) information that a real needs assessment would have provided.
These assumptions could range from assuming the presence of certain services or organisations, to assuming you know the results of a particular aspect of a needs assessment.
Please make it clear at what points you are making assumptions, and make sure your assumptions are reasonable.
Word count
The word count for this report is 2500 words, with an extra 10% allowed (i.e., a maximum of 2750 words) but any words over this will incur a penalty of 10% of your mark for this assignment.
In-text citations, reference bibliographies, diagrams (such as logic models, tables) images and captions for figures and tables will not be included in the word count, but appendices, headings, subheadings and footnotes will be included in the word count. However, you must make reference to and also discuss all diagrams, tables and appendices in the main body of your text. This means that all the important parts of your plan should be included in the prose text: for instance, you cannot simply provide the logic model as a diagram and have two sentences in the text referring to the diagram. You must have an extensive outline and discussion of your logic model within the text also, although you do not have to mention every fact contained in your diagram.
Assessment Criteria
Total possible
Introduction clearly outlines the context, issue and key determinants to the health and wellbeing problem 10
Justification of the interventions selected 15
Clarity of intervention description and logic model 20
Feasibility and appropriateness of program design 10
Choice and justification of evaluation questions 5
Advocacy strategy is relevant and feasible in approach 10
Use of concepts from the subject, where relevant 5
Clarity of response overall – style and grammar 10
Use of evidence and current literature 10
This Medical Sciences Assignment has been solved by our Medical Sciences Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.