PRET7311 - Professional Ethics - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task

INSTRUCTIONS:  
1. No material may be copied from original sources, even if referenced correctly, unless it is a  direct quote indicated with quotation marks. No more than 10% of the assignment may  consist of direct quotes.  
2. Any assignment with a similarity index of more than 25% will be scrutinised for  plagiarism. Please ensure you attach an originality report to your assignment if required.  3. Make a copy of your assignment before handing it in. 
4. Assignments must be typed unless otherwise specified.  
5. All work must be adequately and correctly referenced. 
6. Begin each section on a new page. 
7. Follow all instructions on the assignment cover sheet. 
8. This is an individual assignment –For group assignments, the group may not exceed 4  members and all will be awarded the same mark.

Portfolio of Evidence (PoE)  
This Portfolio of Evidence needs to be developed as you progress through this module. The  questions in this assignment all form part of a single Portfolio of Evidence (POE) to be submitted  at the end of the module. 
Module Assessment — Background and Instructions 
1. As explained in your Module Guide, this modules assessment structure is comprised of  three activities. In order to prepare you for these activities, there will be two compulsory  ICE tasks that must be submitted for marking to your lecturer as per their timeline. These  need not be included in the POE and will be done through the course of your module at  various times decided by your lecturer. The aim of the two Compulsory ICE tasks is to  render additional support to you so that you can be able to complete your Summative PoE  effectively. 
2. You will have three lecturer facilitated touchpoints which will be scheduled prior to the  expected completion of the POE activity as per pacer. This is an opportunity for you to  receive developmental feedback for your three POE activities which you will be working on  throughout the module and will submitting as a summative at the end of the module.  

NB: Failure to submit your final portfolio of evidence by the prescribed time and date (to be given  to you by your campus head of department) will be treated as an absence from examination, and  not as a late assignment. Please refer to the IIE 009 Assessment Strategy and Policy (updated  September 2016) for further details. 
Task 1: ArgumentAnalysis – Short Essay [Marks: 40] For this task, you will need to use your knowledge of argument structures and analysis, as well as ofthe various philosophical approaches you covered in Learning Units 1 and 2 and apply these to a  real-life education scenario in the form of a short academic essay. 
Specifically, you need to: 
• Carefully read the news article by Bongekile Macupe (2017), ‘Parents, NGOs must pay for  school toilets’, available here: https://mg.co.za/article/2017-11-24-00-parents-ngos-must pay-for-school-toilets 
• Then, using the article above as your context, write a short but formal academic essay of  between 800 and 900 words in which you: 
o Analyse the viewpoints, propositions and quality of both positions’ (i.e. that of State  Counsel Simon Phaswane’s, and Section 27’s Mark Heywood’s) arguments, based on  the context and facts provided in this article; 
o Comment on the assumptionsmade about the responsibilities of NGOs, parents, and  the State by the two parties concerned;  
o Identify the kinds of questionsposed by Phaswane,noted their intended purpose, and  outline any one logical fallacy evident in these questions,  
o Identify the most likely philosophical approach/theory likely taken by both Phaswane  and Heywood through an application of each one’s claims, arguments, and/or  positions.
Please use Rubric – Task 1, provided at the end of this PoE, to guide the nature of your essay. It is  important that you use the rubric to evaluate your own work before you submit Task 1 to ensure  that you have completed all required elements adequately. 
Note:Please remember to submit Task 1 through SafeAssign. 
That said, in summary, you will be awarded marks for the following elements of your essay:

• Use of an academic style, tone, and format, and evidence of additional, relevant and credible  research in your 800- to 900-word essay; 
• Analysis of both positions’ arguments; 
• Comment on the assumptions regarding responsibilities of parents, NGOs and the State; • Brief analysis of Phaswane’s questions and a logical fallacy contained therein; and • Suitable application of both positions’ stances and statements to relevant philosophical  approaches or theories. 
Suggested resources for this question: 
For content: 
• Horsthemke, K. et al. 2016. Education Studies. 2e. Cape Town: Oxford University Press  Southern Africa. (Sections 10.3 and 14.3; and Chapter 12) 
• The School of ThoughtOrg. 2017. Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies. [Downloadable  online poster] Available at: https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com. Accessed 12 October 2017. • Wheeler, L.K. 2017. Logical Fallacies Handlist. [Online]. Available at:  https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/fallacies_list.html . Accessed 12 October 2017. 
For formatting/editing/referencing/argument analysis and construction: 
• Siewierski, C. 2015. An Introduction to Scholarship – Building Academic Skills for Tertiary  Study. Cape Town: Oxford University Press Southern Africa. (Chapters 2, 7, 8 and 10, among  others) 
Task 2 — The Role-players in South African Education – Long Essay [Marks: 60] For this task, you will need to use your command of the various conceptualisations of education,  as well as the roles that teachers play within these different conceptions, as covered in Learning  Unit 3. Additionally, you will need to combine this with some of the principles covered in Learning  
Units 1 and 2 to draw a conclusion regarding a hypothetical ‘ideal’ for the South African education  context. 
With the circumstances around Michael Komape’s death as yourreference point, write a formal  essay (of between 800 and 1000 words) in which you offer yourinformed opinion regarding which  role-player(or combination of role-players) you think is/are best suited to doing justice to the  conceptualisation and control of education in South Africa. You need to: 
• Discuss yourinformed view on the roles that the state, the parents, and the community  should play in the provision of basic sanitation at the Mehlodumela Primary School that  Michael Komape attended; 
• Support your opinions with reference to (at minimum) the positions of Locke, Plato, Mill,  Adeyemi and Adeyinka, and Gutmann; 
• Discuss the effects that your selection of role-player/smight have on the roles of teachers in South African classrooms. 
Please use Rubric – Task 2, provided at the end of this PoE, to guide the planning, structure, and  contents of your essay. It is important that you use the rubric to evaluate your own work before  you submit Task 2 to ensure that you have completed all required elements adequately. 
Note:Please remember to submit Task 2 through SafeAssign.
Task 3 — My Teaching Philosophy For this final task, which covers all Learning Units of your PRET7311 module, you need to imagine  that you have accepted your first teaching job after graduation in a rural, under-resourced South  African school (such as Mehlodumela Primary). You have gained limited (butinvaluable)teaching  
experience in differently-resourced schools during your studies at The IIE, and now need to use  these short experiences, and your well-developed theoretical knowledge,to outline a clear  philosophy of teaching practice that will work for the learners and new environment in which you  will teach. 
You therefore need to create your personal philosophy in a way that shows clear consideration of  the under-resourced nature of your new school and its learners in terms of: • Your philosophically supported view of learning and knowledge; 
• Your philosophically supported view of the role of teachers and teaching; • Your philosophically and personally justified goals for your pupils; 
• Your philosophically supported views on discipline; and 
• Your planned approach for prioritising conflicting rights and dealing with ethical dilemmas,  as supported by various philosophical principles and the rights and codes of both the  Constitution of South Africa, and the SACE Code of Professional Ethics. 
Your personal philosophy may take any logical format, but should not exceed five pages in total, and should reflect polished use of English grammar and syntax. Please include subheadings to  help you locate the different elements. 
Please use Rubric – Task 3, provided at the end of this PoE, to guide your approach. It is important  that you use the rubric to evaluate your own work before you submit Task 3 to ensure that you have completed all required elements adequately. 

This PRET7311 - Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.