Professional ePortfolioe Portfolios are Increasingly used in Applications for Employment - Medical Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Professional ePortfolioePortfolios are increasingly used in applications for employment, or as part of professional registration. This assessment is asking you to build the beginnings of an ePortfolio that you can further develop as you continue through your university degree and beyond this as you enter the workforce. This portfolio is broken down into several separate components which together provide an overall presentation of skills, abilities, interests, and vital information that allows a potential employer to determine your ability to be an asset to their workplace.
ii) A professional resumé- A professional-looking head and shoulders photo and a resumé (either using Mahara resume template or another of their choice. With relevant documentation and evidence that supports the resume
iii) A 5-year plan using the SMART goal setting framework to outline 4 SMART goals- goals must cover the following themes: personal, professional, academic, skills focused and can be short, medium term or long term goals that would be achievable within the 5 year timeframe. This can be set out in table form- an example table template will be available on the Canvas site 
iv) A video introduction of yourself to potential employers (3-5 minutes in length) - videos are to be submitted to your pre-prepared personal Youtube account (set to unlisted) and then shared to the ePortfolio page using a special code so that is embedded within the ePortfolio for marking but not able to be viewed by the public 
v) Overall presentation and expression 
rubric is below this page
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeA professional resumé- students can use the resumé template from Mahara ePortfolio or another of their choice (10 marks)
This section must include a Resume and a head and shoulder professional-looking photo 10 to >8.5 Pts
High Distinction

• Excellent, a comprehensive and detailed Resumé that details current education, previous and /or current employment and other relevant experience clearly and concisely, with a skills-focus. Links to supporting documentation are included or the alternatives stated. 8.5 to >7.5 Pts
• Distinction
• Very good, a detailed and well structured Resumé that detail current education, previous and /or current employment and/or other relevant experience clearly, with a skills-focus. Links to supporting documentation are included or the alternatives stated. 7.5 to >6.0 Pts
• Credit
• Good, well structured Resumé that details current education, previous and /or current employment and/or other experience that is mostly relevant, with a skills-focus. Links to supporting documentation are included or the alternatives stated. 6 to >5.0 Pts
• Pass
• Satisfactory, resumé that details some current education, previous and /or current employment and/or other experience that is mostly relevant, with some skills-focus. Some links to supporting documentation are included or the alternatives stated. 5 to >0 Pts
• Unsatisfactory
• Poor, resumé not included or does not detail current education, previous and /or current employment and/or other experience, or detail are not relevant. There is no focus on any relevant skills. No links to supporting documentation are included or no alternatives stated.
• 10 pts
• This criterion is linked to a learning outcome4 SMART goals- goals must cover the following themes: personal, professional, academic, skills focused and can be short, medium term or long-term goals that would be achievable within the 5-year timeframe. (10 marks) 10 to >8.5 Pts
• High Distinction
• Excellent, four well-structured SMART relevant goals are identified which establish intentions for academic, professional, skills-based and personal directions for the next 5 years. 8.5 to >7.5 Pts
• Distinction
• Very good, four clear relevant SMART goals are identified which establish intentions for academic, professional, skills-based and personal directions for the next 5 years. Only minor editing required. 7.5 to >6.0 Pts
• Credit
• Good, 4 mostly relevant SMART goals are identified which establish intentions for academic, professional, skills-based and personal directions for the next 5 years. Limited editing required. 6 to >5.0 Pts
• Pass
• Satisfactory, the majority of goals are included and are relevant. Goals mostly establish intentions for academic, professional, skills-based and personal directions for the next 5 years. Some editing required but meaning is not obscured. 5 to >0 Pts
• Unsatisfactory
• Poor, the majority of goals are not included, are irrelevant or unclear. Goals do not establish intentions for academic, professional, skills-based and personal directions for the next 5 years. Significant editing is required as meaning cannot be established.
• 10 pts
• This criterion is linked to a learning outcome5-year plan to achieve SMART goals 5 marks) 5 to >4.25 Pts
• High Distinction
• Excellent, clear and well-articulated plan presented. Interrelated and specific strategies to achieve goals relevant to academic, professional, skills-based and personal aspirations for the next 5 years are clearly articulated. Plan is evidence-based, incorporating advice, recommendations for success, and information on appropriate pathways, etc. from a variety of credible sources or relevant services. 4.25 to >3.75 Pts
• Distinction
• Very good, clear and well-articulated plan presented. Specific strategies to achieve goals relevant to academic, professional, skills-based and personal aspirations for the next 5 years are clearly articulated with only minor editing required. Plan is largely evidence-based and consistent with information on appropriate pathways from credible sources or relevant services. 3.75 to >3.0 Pts
• Credit
• Good, relevant and mostly and well-articulated plan presented. Numerous specific strategies to achieve goals mostly relevant to academic, professional, skills-based and personal aspirations for the next 5 years are clearly articulated with limited editing required. Plan is mostly evidence-based and consistent with information on appropriate pathways from credible sources or relevant services. 3 to >2.5 Pts
• Pass
• Satisfactory, mostly relevant plan presented. Some appropriate strategies to achieve goals that are mostly relevant to academic, professional, skills-based and personal aspirations for the next 5 years are articulated with some editing required. Plan is somewhat consistent with information from external sources. 2.5 to >0 Pts
• Unsatisfactory
• Poor, plan is absent or irrelevant. No or mostly irrelevant strategies to achieve goals, strategies not relevant to academic, professional, skills-based and personal aspirations for the next 5 years are not included or are significantly unclear. Plans do not show consistency with evidence from the field and will not reasonably lead to the achievement of goals.
• 5 pts
• This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeA video introduction of yourself to potential employers. (10 marks) 10 to >8.5 Pts
• High Distinction
• Excellent, clear and well-articulated introduction to the professional self. Approached the video confidently and professionally. Identified self clearly and introduced self. An appropriate setting for the video. No distractions. Provided a detailed discussion. Uses YouTube. 8.5 to >7.5 Pts
• Distinction
• Very good, clear and well considered introduction to the professional self. Approached the video professionally. Identified self clearly and introduced self. An appropriate setting for the video. Few distractions. Provided a detailed discussion with only minor details missing. Uses YouTube. 7.5 to >6.0 Pts
• Credit
• Good, clear introduction to the professional self. Attempt at a professional approach to the video. Occasional distractions present, i.e. noise or poor location. Provides generic discussion. Uses YouTube. 6 to >5.0 Pts
• Pass
• Satisfactory, Some attempt at a professional approach to the video. Numerous distractions present, i.e. noise or poor location. Only briefly introduces self and provides generic discussion. Uses YouTube. 5 to >0 Pts
• Unsatisfactory
• Poor, very poor video quality in audio or visual, significant distractions, poor introduction and fails to provide any detailed discussion and/or does not use YouTube or does not upload a video.
• 10 pts
• This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeOverall presentation and [removed]5 marks)
• ePortfolio must be a 'collection of pages' 5 to >4.5 Pts
• High Distinction
• The portfolio has a professional appearance and clear structure, with appropriate technical tools aiding the coherence and displaying confidence with Mahara and is structured with clear sections or categories that are relevant to the profession. The portfolio is clearly articulated throughout, with professionally relevant language and terminology. 4.5 to >3.5 Pts
• Distinction
• The portfolio has a professional appearance, with use of various tools in Mahara, and a clear structure. Portfolio uses clear sentences with appropriate spelling and grammar 3.5 to >3.0 Pts
• Credit
• The portfolio has a mostly professional appearance, and related items are grouped together. Portfolio largely uses clear sentences with appropriate spelling and grammar. 3 to >2.5 Pts
• Pass
• The portfolio has a mostly professional appearance, and related items are grouped together. Portfolio largely uses clear sentences with some editing of spelling and grammar. 2.5 to >0 Pts
• Unsatisfactory
• Portfolio displays an unprofessional or inappropriate overall appearance and has no clarity of structure. Aspects of the portfolio cannot be understood due to significant spelling and grammatical errors.

The above Medical Science Assignment has been solved by our  Medical Science??????? Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.