Professional Ethics - Ethics and Sustainability Assignment Help

Assignment Task

INSTRUCTIONS:

1. No material may be copied from original sources, even if referenced correctly, unless it is a direct quote indicated with quotation marks. No more than 10% of the assignment may consist of direct quotes.

2. Any assignment with a similarity index of more than 25% will be scrutinised for plagiarism. Please ensure you attach an originality report to your assignment if required. 3. Make a copy of your assignment before handing it in.

4. Assignments must be typed unless otherwise specified.

5. All work must be adequately and correctly referenced.

6. Begin each section on a new page.

7. Follow all instructions on the assignment cover sheet.

8. This is an individual assignment –For group assignments, the group may not exceed 4 members and all will be awarded the same mark.

Module Assessment — Background and Instructions

1. As explained in your Module Guide, this modules assessment structure is comprised of three activities. In order to prepare you for these activities, there will be two compulsory ICE tasks that must be submitted for marking to your lecturer as per their timeline. These need not be included in the POE and will be done through the course of your module at various times decided by your lecturer. The aim of the two Compulsory ICE tasks is to render additional support to you so that you can be able to complete your Summative PoE effectively.

2. You will have three lecturer facilitated touchpoints which will be scheduled prior to the expected completion of the POE activity as per pacer. This is an opportunity for you to receive developmental feedback for your three POE activities which you will be working on throughout the module and will submitting as a summative at the end of the module.

Task 1: ArgumentAnalysis – Short Essay

For this task, you will need to use your knowledge of argument structures and analysis, as well as ofthe various philosophical approaches you covered in Learning Units 1 and 2 and apply these to a real-life education scenario in the form of a short academic essay.

Specifically, you need to:

• Carefully read the news article by Bongekile Macupe (2017), ‘Parents, NGOs must pay for school toilets’, available here: https://mg.co.za/article/2017-11-24-00-parents-ngos-mustpay-for-school-toilets

• Then, using the article above as your context, write a short but formal academic essay of between 800 and 900 words in which you:

o Analyse the viewpoints, propositions and quality of both positions’ (i.e. that of State Counsel Simon Phaswane’s, and Section 27’s Mark Heywood’s) arguments, based on the context and facts provided in this article;

o Comment on the assumptionsmade about the responsibilities of NGOs, parents, and the State by the two parties concerned;

o Identify the kinds of questionsposed by Phaswane,noted their intended purpose, and outline any one logical fallacy evident in these questions,

o Identify the most likely philosophical approach/theory likely taken by both Phaswane and Heywood through an application of each one’s claims, arguments, and/or positions.

That said, in summary, you will be awarded marks for the following elements of your essay:

• Use of an academic style, tone, and format, and evidence of additional, relevant and credible research in your 800- to 900-word essay;

• Analysis of both positions’ arguments;

• Comment on the assumptions regarding responsibilities of parents, NGOs and the State;

• Brief analysis of Phaswane’s questions and a logical fallacy contained therein; and

• Suitable application of both positions’ stances and statements to relevant philosophical approaches or theories.

This Ethics and Sustainability Assignment has been solved by our Ethics and Sustainability Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.