Professionalism, Ethics and Governance - Case Study - IT Assignment Help

Assignment Task

6C Wamam

U-Wear-It is involved in manufacturing tiny processors for use in the manufacture of wearabletechnology. During manufacture, 64 gold wires, each much finer than a human hair, must be solderedfrom the chip to the pins of the processor. Robots were trialed for the soldering, but the error rate wasunacceptably high. One single mistake in positioning a wire or soldering it, ruined the chip. The robots were also not only prohibitively expensive but required frequent and expensive calibration. Wamam, the IT Production Manager was asked to carry out trials using human technicians for the work. The trials clearly demonstrated that humans had a much lower error rate and were less expensive than robots, but the technicians complained that constantly staring through a microscope at a brightly illuminatedobject gave them headaches and was harmful to their eyes. He reported back to management that he believed the trial had failed. The CEO, Martine was very disappointed, because she thought that the solution was good, and worth a few headaches. Martine asked Wamam to get a professional medicalopinion. Wamam discussed the issue with two senior doctors, who confirmed that this work couldpermanently damage a person’s eyesight in as little as 5 months and could lead to blindness in as littleas 18 months. The company’s legal advisors confirmed that this was clearly in breach of the Work Healthand Safety Act in Australia, so they could not go ahead. Martine was really angry. The next morning she called Wamam into his office. Wamam was surprised to find her quite cheerful. Martine said that she had discovered that there was an island in the Indian Ocean that does not have health and safety laws, and so it would be quite legal for people of that island to solder the processors. And, better still, they were willing to work for one-tenth of the wages of Australians. She said that this was a ‘win win’.

Section 1 – The White Framework
Student Instructions: Fill in the Table below using short sentences or dot points to make a list in each section. You must fill out all three table cells under Issues/Results prior to marking it as complete. You should input 350-500 words into this section.
Case Study Name & Number: Step Process/Step Issues/Results
Step 1: Analyze - The Consequences
Step 2: Analyze - The Actions
Step 3: Make A DecisionSection 2 – The Governance and Regulatory Environment

Part 1 - ACS Code of Professional Conduct Analysis
Identify the appropriate ACS Code of Professional Conduct values along with the relevant sub-paragraph topics by number and sub-paragraph (e.g. 1.2.6 (g) – endeavour to extend public knowledge and understanding of ICT). Group each by value and appropriate corresponding sub-paragraphs relevant to your case study.
Case Study:
(Name & Number)
ACS Code of Professional Conduct Value & Section: 1.2.?
ACS Code of Professional Conduct Section: 1.2.?
ACS Code of Professional Conduct Section: 1.2.?
ACS Code of Professional Conduct Section: 1.2.?

Section 2 – The Governance and Regulatory Environment
Part 2 – Legislative and International Standards Analysis
Identify the appropriate Australian Legislation (e.g. Fair Work Act; Privacy Act). Identify and list relevant Australian/International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (AS ISO/IEC) (e.g. AS ISO/IEC 38500:2016). Provide at least four items in each category in the boxes below.
Case Study:
Australian Legislation
AS/ISO/IEC Standards

Section 3 – Justifying a Decision and Recommending Appropriate Action
Make short text responses to the five (5) questions in the spaces provided. Each response should be between 50 - 80 words (Total not to exceed 400 words).
1. What were the most important professional ethics issues/dilemmas for you in your scenario? (Reference at least two core issues)
2. What do you believe are the most appropriate decisions to be made here for management, organisation and employees?
3. Who is responsible for taking what action here and why? (Name names!)
4. What can be done, or what strategies can be implemented to ensure that a similar situation does not occur again?
5. What did you learn from reading this scenario?

This IT Assignment has been solved by our IT experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.