PSCI 210: Essay Questions Theory Concepts Question Realism Nuclear Deterrence - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

PSCI 210 Essay Questions
Theory Concepts Question
Realism Nuclear deterrence
Rationality Using realism, analyze the nuclear tensions between the US and Iran (or North Korea). What is required for nuclear deterrence to be successful? With this mind, why is it strategic for the US (media, foreign policy, government) to undermine the rationality of Iranian (or North Korean) leadership (by portraying their leaders as irrational)?
1000 words, short critical analysis paper
Single spaced, 12pt font times new roman, normal margins!!
Source: 3 academic sources (in addition to what I provide). This includes (books, academic journals, scholarly articles) to develop concepts and extend analysis + 1 credible news source
Structure of paper
 

Introduction
Thesis Statement (Scope, method (IR theory), argument, concepts, case/issue)

• Literature Review (Deconstruction / Theoretical Framework)
• Historical context/background on theory
• Definition of main concepts and how they relate to each other
• Use theory to frame the question/problem you will be addressing in your paper
• Re-Construction (Framing the issue using your theory)
• Use your theory to analyze a specific case study (real life event)
• Synthesis (Extending analysis to draw on implications, develop argument)
• Conclusion
• Essay Outline / Organization of Argument
• Essay Outline
• Section One: Introduction + Thesis (50 Words)
• Introduction (Topic sentence, historical context)
• Thesis Statement (Make sure this is the last sentence of your introduction). A good thesis statement include the following pieces of information:
• What is the scope/frame of Analysis (what will you be focusing on)Argument (What will you be arguing and how will you be making this argument)
• Concepts (What are the major ideas/concepts you will be defining and analyzing)
• Method (which theory will you be using to make your argument)
• Case Study/Context (which specific case will you be applying the theory to in order to make your argument)
• An example of a strong thesis statement:
• Using realism as a theoretical framework, in my paper, I explore how ISIS, as a terrorist
• organization, uses tactics of guerilla warfare such as suicide bombings to claim legitimacy as a non-state actor
• in international politics. I argue that the group uses guerilla tactics, that rely on the element of surprise, and not
• conventional methods of warfare because they do not have similar military capabilities as sovereign states.
• Section Two: Literature Review (Theory and Conceptual Framing) (300 words)
• Outline the theoretical framework and define the main concepts you will be engaging through this framework. The aim of this section is to provide brief historical background of the theory and using the theory to frame the problem you will be addressing.
• Theory:
• Historical Context
• Key Thinkers, scholars you are engaging Key Concepts
• _______________________________________________________________________
• Use concepts to formulate a research question and identify the problem you will be addressing.
• Research Question:
• Problem to be addressed:
• Find scholarly Sources on to outline/define the Theory and Concepts. You need at least 3 in addition to the ones I provide on Slack.com.
• Theory:
• Main Concepts:
• Collect information on the key concepts and theory. Make sure to write the page number to have strong citations. Once you have enough to define the concept then you have to paraphrase it into your own interpretation of the concept through the lens of the theoretical framework.
• Evidence from the text and Pg # for Citations
• Theory
• The theory’s interpretation of a concept
• The theory’s interpretation of a concept
• Framing the Problem to be addressed
• Section Three: Case Analysis //Re-Construction (Framing the issue) (300 words)
• Case: __________________________
• Make sure you do not try to analyze everything about a case. Choose a specific policy, a political actor, a political institution to focus on. In this section I am testing to see if you can use and apply a major international relations theory to a contemporary political issue. One way to do this is to use the theory to define the concepts and then show how this theory would read/interpret a political discourse or action such as a speech, a policy, an interaction in global politics etc. In this section, make sure to also provide basic historical/political context of which real-life source you will be engaging and the political events.All quotes in this section should be paraphrased and cited. Make sure to develop and address/explore the original theoretical problem/issue you set up in the literature review through a real-life application of it.
• Section Four: Synthesis / Returning to the theoretical problem (Extending analysis to draw on implications, develop argument) (300 words)
• In this section, you have to extend/deepen your application of the theory the case study and explore “so what” and tie up your argument. Why should we care how the theory helps us understand the real world scenario , what does its teach us about the problem you originally set up? What is your argument? Do not try to solve the problems in the world in this section or give solutions!! Just deepen your framing of the THEORETICAL issue and develop your argument. You want to make share there is a connecting red thread that runs through all of the different sections. Here you offers critical analysis and develop argument by further extending you original definition/understanding of concept through the case analysis.
• Conclusion (50 words)
• Summarize the argument
• Essay Rubric for Evaluation
• Writer: __________________________
• Introduction, Thesis, Conclusion:
• Thesis is at the end of the introduction
• Scope/Frame of Analysis
• Method
• Argument (What they will argue, and how they will argue it)
• Concepts
• Context/Issue/Case Study
• Introduction is interesting and not too general.
• Conclusion summarizes argument.
• Score: _______ /5
• Structure/Organization of Argument:
• Does the structure look like this:
• Introduction thesis, Literature Review//Deconstruction (introduce main concepts, set up problem) Case Analysis//Reconstruction (case study, method, analyze a text) Extension//synthesis (use data/observations from reconstruction to critique/expand the original concept from deconstruction) conclusion (summarize argument)
• Does each section perform its specific function in developing an argument?
• Argument is organized like a story developing: problem, application, analysis/critique
• All information is relevant and develops the argument.
• Score: _______ /5
• Completion/Grammar/Spelling:
• Meets word count of 1000-1200 words
• Use a de-colonial or post-colonial theoretical framework
• Little to no spelling and grammar errors.
• Appropriate academic and formal tone
• Margins, font, formatting is appropriate
• Score: _______ /5 Reconstruction:
• Uses a theoretical framework to get data/evidence from a text (speech, poem, articles) or the context
• Provides basic historical and political context of text/source.
• Paraphrases evidence from the text/source to develop an argument/interpretation.
• Focuses in on concepts and uses the theory to frame a particular aspect of the political event.
• Score: _______ /5
• Research:
• Uses minimum 2 scholarly sources in addition to the sources provided by instructor
• Includes a bibliography + in-text citations. (Author’s last name, pg #)
• Quotes are integrated properly and integrated with interpretation/analysis (quotes are explained and do not stand alone as sentences with no context).
• Paraphrases literature to develop and interpret concept and argument
• Scope of argument is not too general and not too specific.
• Substance of argument is not biased, too personal/first person, one-sided, or lacking qualification of arguments (makes assumptions).
• Score: _______ /5 Synthesis:
• Uses evidence/data from the reconstruction to respond to problem set up in the deconstruction.
• Offers critical analysis and develops argument.
• Extends/deepens application of the theory to the case study to explore the implications. Key question to ask is “so what?”
• Ask yourself what the implications of your analysis?
• Try and re-formulate the original theoretical problem and deepen it through application to the real world scenario.
• Score: _______ /5
• Deconstruction and Literature Review
• Shows a deep understanding of the theoretical framework and how to apply it and use it to interpret international relations
• Uses theoretical framework to set up and frame an original “problem” for the argument.

The above Management  Assignment has been solved by our  Management Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.