PSYC104: Food Addiction Prevalence - Introduction to the Bio-Psychology of Eating - Psychology Assessment Answer

Download Solution Order New Solution
Subject Code: PSYC104 Internal Code: 1AGDFB

Psychology Assessment Answer

TASK: Essay Question: Sugar is an addictive substance. Critically evaluate the evidence supporting and opposing this statement and make a determination regarding its accuracy. Take a position (for or against), and state whether sugar is an addictive substance or not. ? Listen to Week 3 Psychology lecture on Appetite. (PDF file) ? Define addiction (using DSM citation) and build your argument according to the definition of addiction. ? Two main definitions or categories of addiction according to the DSM: 1. Psychological/behavioural (e.g., gambling, sex addiction) 2. Neurological/biological (e.g., drug/substance use – cocaine etc.) ? Focus on the pattern of evidence across and between the research literature. ? Avoid focussing on neurological nuances, instead focus on study aims, outcomes, and gaps in the research literature such as; ? Rat studies vs human evidence of addiction, ? Addiction driven by flavour/palatability vs sucrose or sugar, ? Eating style (binging causing addiction vs sugar causing addiction), ? Validity of measurements used (e.g., the Yale Food Addiction Scale), ? Combination of nutrients (high fat/high sugar foods vs micro nutrients causing over consumption), ? Appropriateness of diagnostic criteria, ? Food addiction vs sugar addiction, ? Areas that need further research and development (e.g., human research), ? Difference between sample populations (e.g., genetic differences across BMI). ? It may be useful to use the criteria for addiction in the Diagnostic Statistical Manual as a starting point to determine if the symptoms of sugar consumption physiologically and psychology meet the criteria for addiction. ? There is a lot of neurological and biological evidence for and against sugar addiction, try not to get to overwhelmed with terms. but rather, focus on the overall results of the study, drawing links and conclusions to your overall argument (remember: everyone will be finding these terms challenging as well). ? You must take a position (that is, state whether sugar is addictive or not). ? Critically discuss at least three different pieces of evidence that support your position. The three pieces of evidence must come from research findings (not your personal beliefs and/or experiences) so be sure to cite relevant studies. ? It is not enough to simply cite a study that supports your position; you must critically discuss a study and findings and be sure to highlight the reason/s why sugar may/may not be addictive. ? Introductory paragraphs should state the structure of the essay (i.e., what each section covers) and the position taken by the author with respect to the essay question. ? Each paragraph should clearly address the essay question - the opening sentence of a paragraph usually reflects what will be addressed in the paragraph and the final sentence in a paragraph is usually a summation of the paragraph and also demonstrates how this particular paragraph relates to the essay question/s. ? also important to present published studies that DO NOT support the position you take. However, such counter-evidence should be challenged by critiquing the study (if possible) so as to diminish the veracity of the study results. For example, if all the studies you cite to support your position have been conducted with females but the one study that doesn't support your position was conducted with males, then you could argue that the opposing findings are due to sample differences and therefore do not compromise your arguments and position. ? Consider whether the ecological validity of each study you cite compromises or bolsters your arguments. For example, a study conducted inside the lab where participants answered questions about how they predict they would react in certain situations has less ecological validity than a study which records a participants behaviour in real-world settings without their awareness. ? Conclusions should recap the aim of the essay, the position taken and a very brief overview of the key findings used to support the position take. A concluding sentence that highlights any caveats or limitations of the findings presented or offers avenues of future research, are good ways to finish an essay. ? Reference your arguments accurately - if an idea is not your own you need to acknowledge this and provide and accurate citation. If an idea is your own you need to provide evidence from the literature that supports it. ? To write a good essay you will need to do your own research and find articles relating to your particular essay argument, and extend beyond the starter references. ? There is no set minimum of maximum number of references you need to cite in your essay.
This Psychology Assessment has been solved by our Psychology experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Get It Done! Today

Country
Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
+

Every Assignment. Every Solution. Instantly. Deadline Ahead? Grab Your Sample Now.