PSYC5212: Discipline of Psychological Sciences Report Writing - Research Method and Data Analysis - Psychology Assessment Answer

PSYC5212: Discipline of Psychological Sciences Report Writing - Psychology Assessment Answer

Assessment Task:

This assignment is very different from any lab report that you would have done in the past. It has been deliberately designed for this unit, and to complement and test your knowledge of research methods and data analysis.

In this data analysis assignment, you are cast in the role of someone who is reviewing a journal article that has been submitted for publication. When manuscripts are submitted for publication, they are reviewed by at least two people using a system called blind peer reviewing. What this means is that you don't know who is reviewing your paper, and your name and affiliation are taken off the manuscript so the reviewer does not know the author's name or where the paper comes from. This is an attempt to avoid all sorts of biases creeping into the review process.

The mock manuscript is the single PDF file that has been uploaded. I have tried to present it as closely as possible as a "real" manuscript. It is obviously more basic than the research you would find in a manuscript presented for publication, and the citations (apart from those under the “materials” section) are made up, but the basic structure, format, and presentation is pretty much what you would see in a manuscript.

What is unusual is that you have been provided with the raw data in SPSS format that formed the basis for the manuscript. This is rare, but it does happen. Authors are regularly asked to keep copies of their raw data so that the article reviewer or journal editor can check the statistical analysis. Making raw data publically available for quality control is starting to become more common. This is part of what is referred to as the Open Science movement. 

Finally, there is a letter to the editor that will form the basis for your report. Your job is to fill in the section under the heading; Specific points of: What you need to do is point out the flaws in background, design, method, analysis, and interpretation that has led to your strong rejection of the paper. You need to highlight what the author has done and where he (i.e., me) has gone wrong, and you need to correct his errors by providing the correct analysis of the data, including correct versions of the tables if need be.

Your focus must be on the methodological aspects of the manuscript; for example, you shouldn't waste space making comments on the APA style of the paper or saying that the discussion is too short, or stuff such as that. I repeat: your focus should be on the design, analysis, interpretation, and method. That is the main reason why you have rejected the paper. You certainly aren't meant to criticise the actual research; in other words, there is no need to provide reference material on the actual topic. It is the methodological issues that count. By the way, this also includes ethics.

There is no set format for your review, just as there is no single perfect format for the way "real" reviewers approach reviewing manuscripts. You can use numbered or bullet points, or you can use sub-headings. In fact, part of the assessment will be based on the structure you apply to the task and how well that gets your message across.

This is a totally new report for you, and you may feel that you are swimming in the dark when it comes to presenting the report. This is where the Assessment Discussion Forum comes into its own. Please use it freely to post any questions you might have, no matter how naive you think they might be.

This PSYC5212: Psychology Assessment has been solved by our Psychology Assessment Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.