PUBH6007 - Report - Program Design, Evaluation and Implementation - Management Assignment

Assignment Task - 

Learning Outcomes

This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes:

1.  Describe and construct a program theory and program logic diagram for a program based on prioritised need
2.  Construct a clear program plan using goals, objectives, strategies and indicators in preparation for implementation and evaluation.
3. Design the implementation of a program, including; stakeholder engagement, communication strategies, and budget and time management strategies.
4.  Understand and explain the principles of evaluation, types of evaluation, ethical issues and roles of an evaluator
5. Develop knowledge of how to conduct an evaluation of processes, impacts and outcomes of a program

      Submission

Presentation is due in Week 11 with a copy of the Powerpoint submission submitted via Discussion board in Blackboard.

The report of 1500 words along with peer evaluation form is due on the Sunday (End of week 11).

Context

For Assessment 2, you will give a presentation on a designed program – planned to address a  identified need in your community, or service. You will focus on a prioritised need for developing this plan.

Assessment Description: Presentation:

PART 1

A program logic diagram for a program based on prioritised need

PART 2 A clear program plan that discusses the following:

• The overarching goal of the program (the overall aim that you want to achieve via your program),
• Objectives (specific desired changes that will help to meet the overall goal). There should be at least 3 objectives
• Strategies (how you will go about achieving your aim and objectives; the activities that will contribute to the achievement of the objectives);
• Risks or Challenges (Identify any potential challenges to the program)
  • What may occur that can put the program at risk, what are the challenges, and how will you address them? (for example, people may not enrol?)
• Resources required (Financial, Physical, Human)

PART 3: INDIVIDUAL Summary/self?peer evaluation

• Prepare 1500 words INDIVIDUAL summary report incorporating all the sections of the presentation in brief. Use the same headings as the presentation.

• Complete the self and peer evaluation forms Combine the 2 documents (individual summary and self?peer evaluation form) into one PDF file, and submit on Blackboard.

Assessment criteria: (Presentation – 25%) – see Learning Rubric on Following pages

• Demonstrates ability to present a clear program logic diagram, goals, objectives, strategies, process indicators and evaluation plan, using the SMART criteria (40%)
• Demonstrates critical reasoning and analysis skills in presenting a coherent rationale and outline for the proposed program, identifying potential implementation issues including resources and challenges (35%)
• Group cohesion is reflected in the presentation (15%)
• General assessment criteria (10%):
  • Provides a lucid introduction
  • Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts
• Justifies all the work presented with sufficient evidence support Provides a logical summary.
• Correctly uses professional language in presentation with grammar, tense and accuracy and references footnoted.

Assessment criteria: (Summary/Self?Peer Evaluation – 25%) – See Learning Rubric on following pages

• Demonstrates ability to summarise highlights of the program design, implementation and evaluation program (40%)
• Demonstrates critical reasoning and analysis skills in presenting a coherent rationale and outline for the proposed program, identifying potential implementation issues including resources and challenges (35%)
• General assessment criteria (10%): Demonstrates ability to correctly use APA referencing as a group, with references clearly identified.
• Self and Peer Evaluation forms (15%)

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.