REHA2243: Introduction to Clinical Practice - Medical Science Assignment Help

1 Assessment details

1.1 Assessment task: Course guide assessment task 2 – Assignment

1.2 Module: Introduction to clinical practice

1.2.1 Contribution to course learning: This particular assessment task maps to the following course learning outcomes.

CLO 1 - Reconcile the pathophysiology of common musculoskeletal conditions with patient signs and symptoms

CLO 2 - Demonstrate clinical reasoning to formulate a list of differential diagnoses of common musculoskeletal conditions

CLO 4 - Formulate a working diagnosis based on evidence-based practice

CLO 5 - Compose comprehensive accounts of clinical encounters which meet medico-legal requirements for on-going care and patient management

At the completion of this task, students will contribute to demonstrating competency in the learning outcomes, listed above, for this course.

2 Instructions:

2.1 Undertake an analysis of the case study provided by academic staff and complete the ALL PARTS of the assignment. The word limit for the assignment is 1500words +/-10% will be acceptable. Please consider how to make information presentable ie. tables, dot point

2.2 Part 1 – Draw from the case study the relevant information and record in a SQIDS CARNTAG format.

Provide one appropriate 'high priority’ specific question you would ask to screen each of the patients:

• Presenting complaint
• Past medical history;
• Family medical history; and
• Body systems review

To accompany every question you wish to ask, please also provide your supporting rationale (briefly explain WHY it is important to ask the question) to demonstrate your clinical reasoning.

2.3 Part 2 – From the physical examinations and neuromusculoskeletal (NMSK) orthopaedic tests you have learned to date (in this course OR MEDS2147 – Medical Examination 2):

• List all examinations you would perform in this case;
• Describe how you would execute one NMSK orthopaedic test in detail;
• Explain the theoretical underpinnings of how this test is thought to ‘work’ (use scientific evidence); and
• Discuss the ‘clinical usefulness’ of the NMSK orthopaedic test you explained in detail (use scientific evidence).

Does this patient require referral for further investigations?

• Please explain your rationale for your decision

2.4 Part 3 – case narrative you would give to a supervising clinician about this patient.

The narrative will:

• Introduce the patient (name, sex, occupation, etc);
• Provide a clear outline of the case (which you gathered from the clinical case study provided);
• List three (3) differential diagnoses you have prior to undertaking the examination;
• Outline which examinations are likely to support or negate your differential diagnoses
• Include your KEY anticipated examination results, and therefore a working diagnosis

This REHA2243 - Medical Science has been solved by our Phd Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.