SCI5250 - Best Practice Engagement of Stakeholders In Environmental Impact Assessment & Literature Review - Environment Assignment Help

Assignment Task

1. Introduction 

The purpose of this paper is to identify two key aspects of best practice engagement of stakeholders in environmental impact assessment (EIA) based on a review of contemporary international literature. 

2. Understanding stakeholder engagement in EIA applications 

Engaging stakeholders in EIA relates to the broad best practice principle of “participative” promoted by the International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA & IEA 1999, p3). Being participative means that an EIA process should provide opportunity for stakeholders to be informed and involved with their concerns being explicitly addressed in documentation and (approval) decision-making (e.g. Andre et al. 2006; Fundingsland Tetlow & Hanusch 2012; IAIA & IEA 1999). The broader principle of providing natural justice in decision-making; i.e. that people affected by a decision have a legal right to have input to the making of that decision (e.g. Bates 1997; Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters 1998) is central to stakeholder engagement in EIA (Morrison-Saunders 2018). However, it translates into only “minimum levels of public participation” (Morrison-Saunders 2019, p9). Full environmental justice extends beyond input and inclusion to remedying the environmental and social impacts identified (Dilay et al 2019) and ensuring that projects overall are in the public interest (Joseph et al 2020). There is a further psychosocial effect on communities arising from their involvement in EIA processes (Baldwin and Rawstorn 2018). 

A distinction can be made between stakeholders affected by a proposal (IAIA and IEM, 1999;  Morrison-Saunders, 2018) and those simply having an interest in it. The implication is that  greater participation opportunity should be extended to directly affected parties, relative to  others having only a broad interest. This this is consistent with the position of UNEP (2018,  p63) and Morrison-Saunders (2019) who wrote that ‘in some jurisdictions face-to-face  meetings are only available to those directly affected by a proposal undergoing EIA’ (p10). 

The extent to which the ‘participative’ principle outlined by IAIA & IEM (1999) is 'best  practice' is debatable in light of the spectrum of public participation possibilities (e.g.  Arnstein 1969; IAP2 2014; Sheedy 2008) which extends from informing to consulting, and involving through to empowering community participants. Hartz-Karp et al (2015, p398)  argue that a transition to sustainability necessitates moving towards 'deliberative  collaborative governance' in which assessment processes pursue a ‘coherent public voice'  implemented by means of 'consensus-oriented decision-making' (i.e. affected persons  actually help make the decision). This means that best practice stakeholder engagement would extend beyond simple participation.  

1 - Stakeholder engagement in EIA varies according to the local political and cultural values,  traditions and institutions in place (Petts 1999; Noble 2015). Examples here include the

2 - tension between Western and non-Western views (Morgan 1998, p152 & 155), that  increasing levels of maturity in democracy may lead to higher levels of public engagement  (O’Riordan and Sewell 1981), and suggestions that public participation in EIA practice in  China is limited because procedures are poorly defined, ignored or missing (Bina et al 2011). Thus, ‘local socio-political context must be taken into consideration when deciding on what  might constitute best practice’ (Morrison-Saunders 2019, p11).  

3. Conclusion 

Drawing these points together, best practice engagement of stakeholders in EIA should: 

• inform and address the concerns of all interested parties during EIA; and

• explicitly engage with affected parties and incorporate their values and viewpoints  into EIA decision-making through consensus-based approaches where appropriate. 

This SCI5250 - Environment Assignment has been solved by our Environment Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.